- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal Indictment Against ICE Agent Who Lied About Shooting in Minnesota
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
From the Texas Tribune:
LINK
This whole case is so weird.
quote:
But the person familiar with the investigation disputed the prosecutor’s characterization, saying the civil rights probe is continuing and there has been no final decision on whether to bring additional charges. The prosecutor, Matthew Evans, was fired Thursday and is now under investigation for alleged obstruction of a grand jury probe, the person said.
LINK
This whole case is so weird.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:01 pm to tigerfootball10
quote:
Poof story gone!!
What's your point? I am for prosecuting anybody who breaks the law...even if they're law enforcement.
I screamed from the rooftops about why the Trump DOJ should have reopened the investigation of Michael Byrd. I posted about it under Biden...but suppression of evidence and prosecutions made sense under the team that staged the Fedsurrection.
Same about the officers who lied under oath about J6...but particularly Harry Dunn who committed clear perjury against the Oath Keepers.
A quick search showed this about me wondering why the Trump DOJ wasn't releasing more information about Ashli Babbett:

This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Castro, obviously a brown person so you and the Dems are both racist by your own standards.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:07 pm to JimEverett
quote:
This whole case is so weird.
Agreed. The one thing we KNOW is that Matthew Evans won't be CONVICTED of obstruction. In the unlikely event that a reporter asks DOJ about Evans's claim that he was called off, they can just say "no comment on a matter that might be under investigation."
This is the same cheap smear as saying Joe Kent was "under investigation for leaking classified documents." It gives the villagers feces to sling at objective observers...even though it was a lie from the beginning.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I guess the reality of this is that the DOJ is/will be happy if this Castro guy is living life down in Mexico with his girlfriend/wife and this whole thing disappears. Which looks like will happen.
Castro is//was probably not in any real danger of a conviction, but having a removal hearing and then an immunity defense would just feed into liberal hysteria about Trump's SS force or whatever they call it. Now they can say "we tried" and nothing else.
Castro is//was probably not in any real danger of a conviction, but having a removal hearing and then an immunity defense would just feed into liberal hysteria about Trump's SS force or whatever they call it. Now they can say "we tried" and nothing else.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:17 pm to Zgeo
quote:
So he shot a criminal in the leg and they want to persecute……sick….
He didn't know WHOM he was shooting through a closed door. That's the whole point. He didn't shoot the guy he was chasing. He didn't shoot a criminal.
I know facts confuse and anger you, but if you're interested:
####
If you're referring to Christian Castro's January 14, 2026 shooting in Minneapolis, there were actually two men involved, and that's important to distinguish.
Alfredo Aljorna was the man Castro and another ICE agent were chasing after a traffic stop. Aljorna ran into the home he shared with Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, and Castro fired through the closed door, striking Sosa-Celis in the leg.
Federal authorities initially characterized both Aljorna and Sosa-Celis as “violent criminal illegal aliens” and charged them with assault. Those charges were subsequently dropped after video evidence contradicted the agents' account.
But according to Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, both men were legally in the United States. A report specifically states that “both men were legally in the U.S.”
So, no—the man Castro was chasing, Alfredo Aljorna, was not an illegal alien according to the subsequent reporting. The government's original characterization was apparently false.
Was Aljorna deported?
I cannot find evidence that Aljorna was deported. In fact, the available reporting indicates that the federal assault case against him was dropped after the video evidence undermined the government's allegations. I also haven't found a subsequent ICE removal proceeding or deportation record for him.
There is an interesting wrinkle, though: the man who was actually shot, Sosa-Celis, was the homeowner/occupant rather than the person Castro was chasing. So if your question is specifically about the person Castro was pursuing, that's Alfredo Aljorna, and the evidence I've found says he was legally present in the U.S.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:27 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
You sound like my sister. She watches a lot of CNN and MSNOW.
You really think you would find in-depth analysis on CNN or MSNOW?
For those who are familiar with the law and the Constitution, it's a really interesting case.
For those who think some people are above the law as long as they're on your side, you don't care about the legal system that makes our country great. Got it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:39 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Now they can say "we tried" and nothing else
Thanks. That's a good theory. The timing (sitting on it for 7 months, then waiting until Castro was out of custody) shows that's not true.
This DOJ doesn't get high marks for plausibility and transparency. For fun, consider this. After a year long FOIA battle, DOJ finally produced the Form 409 regarding Maxwell's transfer to a cushy facility after Blanche's visit. EVERYTHING except Maxwell's name and a date was redacted "for privacy":)
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:43 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Because I want the law enforced?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 5:46 pm to Undertow
When have you seen me say otherwise?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 7:30 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Why would he lie about it? He knew it would cost him his job.
Leftists don't care about anything other than advancing leftist garbage.
Popular
Back to top

1





