- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fed Study Vindicates Trump: 150 Years of Evidence Shows Tariffs Lower Inflation
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:35 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:35 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Any one-off tariff related consumer price increase decreases demand.
Did you read the study in OP?
The costs of tariffs lead to unemployment when then deflates prices.
Which, again, is the literal opposite of the stated goal of increasing employment domestically by "bringing manufacturing back"
2
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:35 pm to Adam Banks
AdamAss doesnt get it does he. There are ways to reduce unemployment.
You know... bring businesses back. Getting rid of illegal immigration.. etc.
You might just wake up 1 day. I doubt it... but praying for you.
You know... bring businesses back. Getting rid of illegal immigration.. etc.
You might just wake up 1 day. I doubt it... but praying for you.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:35 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
What is next, a study telling us how awesome recessions are?
SDV is in here literally arguing this
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:36 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
AdamAss doesnt get it does he. There are ways to reduce unemployment.
You know... bring businesses back.
Which would then cause inflation of prices
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
Nope. Just what you want to happen. Not reality.
We went through this all the way back in 2016-18. Facts are not on your side.
We went through this all the way back in 2016-18. Facts are not on your side.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:43 pm to Hateradedrink
quote:
SDV is in here literally arguing this
You dont know what literally means
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:43 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Rifle is a shithole.
Maybe as I have never been there. My grandfather was born and raised in Riffle. I have many pictures from days past and it once was beautiful. Colorado has gone libtard and that will bring on ugliness. It is a shame.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which, again, is the literal opposite of the stated goal of increasing employment domestically by "bringing manufacturing back"
Manufacturing increases do not happen in months. You know this but still blow the trumpet as loud as you can. There will be tough times in order to bring on better times.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Nope.
Did you read the study in OP?
Couldn't care less.
Any more than I would if a "study" correctly observed the sky as blue, and then attributed the blue color to gay fairy pixie dust sprinkled in contrails. The sky is still blue.
Tariffs are are identical in economic effect to corporate taxes. Except, unlike corporate taxes, tariffs are at least somewhat absorbed internationally.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then how will we bring manufacturing back to the US, if prices don't increase
You answered your own question
Prices dont increase, so the board asks "where can we trim fat?"
Welllllllll, if we move manufacturing back to the US, guess what? We save x% on tariffs. Every shipment. Profit!!
But you knew that
Unless you actually think companies lower prices when they offshore, rather than pocketing the savings?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:55 pm to Warboo
quote:
Manufacturing increases do not happen in months.
What you're arguing isn't what the OP study is discussing.
The employment issues causing the projected deflation aren't because of a gap in infrastructure building. It's from the negative economic outcomes from tariffs themselves, directly.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:57 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
You answered your own question
Prices dont increase
If they don't, the employment won't follow.
If the employment doesn't follow, then prices will deflate (which is the argument in OP).
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:58 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Been seeing people copy and past that same “email from my supplier” since about February. Please, take that AI bullshite elsewhere.
No, you haven’t seen that. Because it was just sent on Wednesday and I don’t lie. I’m not here to try and impress anyone with made up bullshite. We all have our experiences and those should be shared to some extent. This is real and it’s happening across all industries. You clearly aren’t exposed to this or you would know otherwise. You can keep your head in the sand if you like. I don’t give a shite. Margins are shrinking for suppliers as they attempt to insulate consumers. That is what has been happening behind the scenes and there are a number of posters that can and will tell you the same thing. The problem is that they cannot just continue to absorb the added costs… it will be passed down to you in time as a consumer. Or the business that employs you and you see your bonus disappear. People like me make more money with tariffs, so on a personal level I don’t particularly care. But I do care about the overall health of our economy and that is being challenged right now.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 6:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh BS.
From the paper:
Show me where they state they used job creation policies and included that into this study. You cant because they did not consider it and tell you they used tariff changes only.
From the paper:
quote:
Using only tariff changes driven by long-run considerations—a traditional narrative identification—
Show me where they state they used job creation policies and included that into this study. You cant because they did not consider it and tell you they used tariff changes only.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:01 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Show me where they state they used job creation policies and included that into this study.
I never said that's what the study said.
I said that's what Scott Bessent said.
The study and Bessent are at odds.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
Which, again, is the literal opposite of the stated goal of increasing employment domestically by "bringing manufacturing back"
When I stated this:
I was not arguing the OP. I was calling you out on your post above.
Again, I stated that there will be a lull prior to the benefits.
When I stated this:
quote:
Manufacturing increases do not happen in months.
I was not arguing the OP. I was calling you out on your post above.
quote:
The employment issues causing the projected deflation aren't because of a gap in infrastructure building. It's from the negative economic outcomes from tariffs themselves, directly.
Again, I stated that there will be a lull prior to the benefits.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
You’ve had enough L’s this week like your graph that showing prices going down. Sit this one out pal
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:29 pm to Warboo
quote:
Maybe as I have never been there. My grandfather was born and raised in Riffle. I have many pictures from days past and it once was beautiful. Colorado has gone libtard and that will bring on ugliness. It is a shame.
I am sure that back in the day it was beautiful but now it is not. There are few "Libtards" in Rifle, that was Boebert's district.
Colorado is a beautiful state with lots of reasonable people from across the political spectrum. You should visit.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:32 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
am sure that back in the day it was beautiful but now it is not. There are few "Libtards" in Rifle, that was Boebert's district. Colorado is a beautiful state with lots of reasonable people from across the political spectrum. You should visit.
I have been to Colorado but not riffle. The beauty of the state is undeniable. The cancer of the left is ruining it though. It is a shame.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:40 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
You’ve had enough L’s this week
What?
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News