Started By
Message

re: FBI officials were 'rattled' and 'blindsided' by Trump's call for Ukraine

Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:24 am to
Posted by DeusVultMachina
Member since Jul 2017
4245 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:24 am to
FBI officials are seditious pricks that need to be stood in front a brick wall with blindfolds on.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:27 am to
As is evidenced by #exposecnn, we get the "news" they want us to get. Nothing they report on can be thought of as legitimate anymore. The media are liars, period!

reminds me of this meme that you haven't seen in a while

Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17413 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:41 am to
quote:

But that doesn't mean it was a quid pro quo if Biden wasn't specifically part of the deal going in, and there is no evidence I've seen that says he was.
quote:

You trying to make a big deal out of that is a laughable attempt to divert attention away from Trump's extortion of Ukraine's government for personal political gain.
If you’re unable to see the inherent hypocrisy and/or cognitive dissonance in these two positions then there is simply no point in discussing this issue with you any further.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48716 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:32 am to
The FBI no longer fights street crime and organized crime? Their new job is to support the CIA's effort to oust POTUS from office?

Looks that way to me.

Posted by RPC4LSU
Thibodaux, LA
Member since Jan 2006
1953 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:54 am to
quote:

How about Ivanka and her China trademarks? And Kushner as the foreign policy guru so he can fleece Qatar out of $500 million on a 99 year lease on his failing 666 Fifth Ave. property?

Give me a fuking break. You act like it's one-sided.


Stick to the corruption at hand. As soon as you come up with PROOF of corruption by Jared or Ivanka get back to me. If there is corruption by Jared then he can go to jail right behind The Bidens, Hillary, Comey, Clapper, Etc.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6918 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Biden had nothing to do with Busima. They certainly could use his name to try to open doors, but that's no different than making a campaign contribution.


:lol: :lol:

How deep is that hole you are in? Is Lebron in there with you?
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14218 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:25 am to
John F. Kennedy was 100% right in wanting to abolish the CIA. the fact they put a bullet in his head shows, they all need to be taken down in dramatic fashion and exposed for what they are...
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
4818 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:29 am to
the WB's own memo states that the transcript is word for word as the call was.

The WB's own memo!!! It doesn't matter what you think the damn ellipse mean.

any story that opens with the "manufacturing or digging up dirt" you know where that is going.

Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14309 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

They look into Burisma and we have Joe on video making threats. frick you. He's protecting his investment.

Biden made a threat. Is he making threats on his own behalf or on behalf of the Obama administration?

Biden/Obama Admin were not the only ones calling for Shokin to be replaced. The IMF and the EU were calling for Shokin to be removed.

Also, 8 Senators from the bipartisan Senate Ukraine Caucus sent a letter to Ukraine President Poroshenko in February 2016 which said in part:

quote:

we respectfully ask that you address the serious concerns raised by Minister Abromavicius?. We similarly urge you to press ahead with urgent reforms to the Prosecutor General's office and judiciary.

Senator Portman press release

Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14309 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

If you’re unable to see the inherent hypocrisy and/or cognitive dissonance in these two positions then there is simply no point in discussing this issue with you any further.

Your failure to see the difference between Biden's threat, made on behalf of the Obama Administration, and Trump's withholding military aid for his personal political gain is a symptom of your Trump Authoritarian Syndrome.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17413 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 2:22 pm to
Your failure to see the difference in “I’ve seen no evidence to support your claim” and “you must accept my claim without evidence” is indicative of your inability to think rationally.

muh ellipses
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111803 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

frick the FBI and the CIA.


And ATF.
And Treasury.
And the IRS.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14309 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

“you must accept my claim without evidence” is indicative of your inability to think rationally.
muh ellipses

Before the transcription was released, Trump said:
quote:

All because they didn’t know that I had a transcript done by very, very talented people — word for word, comma for comma. Done by people that do it for a living. We had an exact transcript
.

So, why did we get a "transcript" with ellipses? A transcript with ellipses only when Trump is discussing the investigations he wants.

Answer me that.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17413 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:00 pm to
quote:


So, why did we get a "transcript" with ellipses? A transcript with ellipses only when Trump is discussing the investigations he wants.

Answer me that.

The ellipses were to indicate pauses. I’ve already attempted to explain that.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14309 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

The ellipses were to indicate pauses. I’ve already attempted to explain that.
No. you attempted to pull something it out of your arse without any rhyme or reason or authority.

There is no transcription style or guide that allows for an ellipse to be used to indicate a pause.

However, the APA Style and the Chicago Manual of Style, for example, dictate that, in a transcript, an ellipse be used to indicate an omission of a word, sentence, or section from a text.

If Trump said that they had a word-for-word, comma for comma, transcript and "We had an exact transcript", why does the transcript they provided have ellipses in critical sections of the transcript?
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
17413 posts
Posted on 10/15/19 at 11:43 pm to
Tell you what, Ace.

You go out and find a source for your wild speculations. Link me anyone on the call, who actually heard the words spoken by Trump, that will emphatically state that significant details were deliberately excised from the conversation as transcribed that radically altered it's meaning.

Since you are completely convinced that three consecutive periods represents an intentional obfuscation of illegal coercion of a foreign leader by the POTUS, you must clearly be aware of proof of such misdeeds, and will gladly provide such evidence.

If not, kindly shut the frick up about your goddamn ellipses.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87633 posts
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:09 am to
The WB would have lead with the additional info on the ellipses after the transcript came out

Texridder is wrong
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23802 posts
Posted on 10/16/19 at 12:55 am to
I am not going to argue with Comrade Ridder any more.

He knows that he is lying, he is merely spewing talking points, which is what they all do. Our efforts should be expended finding out where they get said talking points all the time and expose them.

Leave the little commies alone, they are a lost cause.They crave the attention. Don't give them what they want. Let's go after the Commissars.
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 12:57 am
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14309 posts
Posted on 10/16/19 at 1:52 am to
dp
This post was edited on 10/16/19 at 1:54 am
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14309 posts
Posted on 10/16/19 at 1:53 am to
quote:

the WB's own memo states that the transcript is word for word as the call was.

So how do you know the that the WB (or whoever told the WB about it) saw the exact transcription that was released.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram