- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI arrests/raids Catholic pro-life speaker/author, guns drawn as his terrified kids watch
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:34 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
as written
Ok clown
0
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:37 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Shoving an old man to the ground is not “protected free speech,” even if the old man supported abortion access.
Hank thinks this priest and his son hunted this old abortion zealot down and attacked him.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:37 pm to David_DJS
K.
But I'm still going to laugh at calling teenagers "babies" and M4s the "big guns."
But I'm still going to laugh at calling teenagers "babies" and M4s the "big guns."
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:What was the intent?
the intent element
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:51 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
K. But I'm still going to laugh at calling teenagers "babies" and M4s the "big guns."
K but I'm gonna laugh at someone defending the thug fbi raiding a home for a priest when a phone call to his lawyer could suffice.
If you think Hank isn't the retarded one in this thread....
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
Oh , adds up.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 3:55 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Shoving an old man to the ground is not “protected free speech,” even if the old man supported abortion access.
You’re pretty defensive of gender identity and abortion, among other things. It would be weird if it wasn’t so transparent.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:09 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:Why do you keep calling this guy a “priest?”
Turbeauxdog
Just curious.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:18 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Oh , adds up.
I don't know anything about you or what you've said in this thread.
Do you think she was being sensationalist?
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:19 pm to AggieHank86
Probably because he’s not Catholic.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:20 pm to Turbeauxdog
not a catholic priest with 7 children.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:21 pm to Turbeauxdog
not a priest
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:22 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Shoving an old man to the ground is not “protected free speech,” even if the old man supported abortion access.
I’m fairly certain it wasn’t the violation of his child’s speech that he was concerned about.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:39 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Whoever ... by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with ... any person ....
If he was defending his child from what a reasonable person could foresee being an imminent battery, then the father does not meet the elements, right? Those elements were only applicable to actions intended to stop someone from assisting the patient getting into the hospital, right?
This post was edited on 9/26/22 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Shoving an old man to the ground is not “protected free speech,” even if the old man supported abortion access.
There are many videos of blacks assaulting old men at events. No charges that I ever heard came of it. They did a lot more than shove.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:51 pm to AggieHank86
So Hank I am not piling on, just asking your thoughts as the person taking the opposing position and apparently you are a lawyer. I saw this
What do you think is the reason it played out this way, if it did? And does it make you second guess the motives of the DOJ?
quote:
When both the city police and the district attorney declined to file charges against Houck, the escort filed a private criminal complaint in Philadelphia municipal court, Middleton said. The case was dismissed in July when the man repeatedly didn’t show up in court, Middleton said. Just days later, Houck received a “target letter” from the U.S. Attorney’s Office informing him that he was the focus of a federal criminal probe into the same incident, Middleton said.
What do you think is the reason it played out this way, if it did? And does it make you second guess the motives of the DOJ?
Posted on 9/26/22 at 4:54 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Well, let's see. 25-30 armed FBI agents surrounded her home, with her kids there, screaming with their weapons drawn, as the kids were getting ready for school on a Friday morning? The FBI shackled her husband's hands and feet, like he was Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, for shoving an apparent 72y/o piece of shite because the apos got in his 12y/o son's face?
Do you think she was being sensationalist?
Do you think she was being "sensationalist?"
Posted on 9/26/22 at 5:00 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
If he was defending his child from what a reasonable person could foresee being an imminent battery, then the father does not meet the elements, right? Those elements were only applicable to actions intended to stop someone from assisting the patient getting into the hospital, right?
None of that matters. The case was already thrown out of court.
Garland and his Gestapo are turning absolutely NOTHING into a federal case of harassment and intimidation.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 5:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Do you think she was being "sensationalist?"
Absolutely.
Posted on 9/26/22 at 5:11 pm to Trevaylin
Sorry mislabeled
Posted on 9/26/22 at 5:12 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Then you are an IDIOT!
Absolutely.
Page 17 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News