- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI, 5 other agencies probe possible covert Kremlin aid to Trump
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:53 pm to MrLarson
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:53 pm to MrLarson
quote:
He was at my house during the time in question.
Now prove that he wasn't.
And I was there as well; we all played cards, drank Dixie beers and ate shrimp po boys.
0
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:53 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
It's been proven that a different Michael Cohen was in Prague. It hasn't been proven that the relevant Michael Cohen was or wasn't in Prague. I promise you that Prague is big enough to hold more than one Michael Cohen at a time.
By that standard of journalism, I'd like to see the evidence that you are not a goat raper. Until I see it, it's fair to assume you are one, mr goat raper.
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:54 pm to MrLarson
You sound awfully upset about being called out as wrong. A CNN article providing evidence that a different Michael Cohen was in Prague isn't proof that Trump's lawyer wasn't also in Prague. You have no idea if he was there nor do I. You have no idea if he wasn't there nor do I.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:55 pm to Vacherie Saint
Wait...what?
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:56 pm to Vacherie Saint
Since you don't know me you shouldn't assume I was nor that I wasn't a goat raper. You should admit you have no idea either way. The same with Michael Cohen and the supposed Prague trip.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:56 pm to VOLhalla
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:58 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Investigators are examining how money may have moved from the Kremlin to covertly help Trump win,
Is this the same Trump that was repeatedly criticized for his lack of fundraising as well as for getting outspent in some cases 40:1? How is Russian money gonna put him over the top, when for months he was barely spending any money?
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:58 pm to tigerinDC09
Obama's FBI. After Friday, this bs comes to a screeching halt. And the REAL investigation of REAL criminality begins.
God only knows how many incriminating emails and documents are being obliterated at this very moment. It is their only play to survive and remain in the game. Of course...there is the issue of Russian hackery, turning up the dirty laundry.
God only knows how many incriminating emails and documents are being obliterated at this very moment. It is their only play to survive and remain in the game. Of course...there is the issue of Russian hackery, turning up the dirty laundry.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:58 pm to VOLhalla
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:02 pm to VOLhalla
You are essentially saying that because another dude named Michael Cohen was in Prague, it's reasonable to assume that Trump's lawyer may have been in Prague too because Prague is big.
This coming from an idiot who refused to acknowledge Clinton corruption in the face of mountains of evidence.
You are either a hack or a troll. Either way, you have far too much time in your hands.
This coming from an idiot who refused to acknowledge Clinton corruption in the face of mountains of evidence.
You are either a hack or a troll. Either way, you have far too much time in your hands.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:02 pm to notsince98
Absolutely it counts as evidence. I would point out that the dossier gives a timeframe for the Prague meeting as occurring in August of 2016 (FYI another's article actually extended this timeframe into September as well). So a witness saying he definitely was in California one day in August doesn't do much to prove he wasn't in Prague any other day that month. So it's shitty evidence.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:06 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
You are essentially saying that because another dude named Michael Cohen was in Prague, it's reasonable to assume that Trump's lawyer may have been in Prague too because Prague is big.
No I'm not. What I am saying is that evidence that another Michael Cohen was in Prague is completely irrelevant when trying to determine if Trump's lawyer was in Prague. There isn't some type of limit on the number of Michael Cohen's in Prague
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:08 pm to MrLarson
Yeah, Wolf bought that they had evidence that Trump's attorney was in Prague. Turns out what they had was completely useless. It does nothing to prove or disprove the lawyer was there. Which some people have a problem wrapping their heads around.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:12 pm to VOLhalla
So the supposed eveidence ended up being the wrong MC, and frothy mouthed libs have yet to find real evidence that the MC is question was ever there. He denies it and the dossier that started the lie has been discredited.
Yet here you are, still talking about it as if it's real. It's like the fricking Salem with trial with you, which brings me back to the goat raper analogy. You are one because I say you are. Now the onus is on you to prove that you've never raped a goat.
Yet here you are, still talking about it as if it's real. It's like the fricking Salem with trial with you, which brings me back to the goat raper analogy. You are one because I say you are. Now the onus is on you to prove that you've never raped a goat.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:17 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Part of me hopes this isn't true.
After the last 8 years, you are entitled to a little hope. It was promised to you.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:17 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
he dossier that started the lie has been discredited.
No it hasn't been discredit. Nor has it been proven.
quote:
Yet here you are, still talking about it as if it's real.
I've never said a damn thing in the dossier is true. I got no idea. I just like to point out how illogical it is to say that since one Michael Cohen was in Prague then another could not be.
quote:
It's like the fricking Salem with trial with you, which brings me back to the goat raper analogy. You are one because I say you are. Now the onus is on you to prove that you've never raped a goat.
Oh no!
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:20 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
* Investigating since last spring
Which would predate the Steele memos.
quote:
* Investigators got FISA warrant in Oct.
Article cites prior BBC article but does not independently confirm this. I'd use caution here. I did not like the BBC's sourcing on this part.
The part that really gets my attention:
quote:
Investigators are examining how money may have moved from the Kremlin to covertly help Trump win, the two sources said. One of the allegations involves whether a system for routinely paying thousands of Russian-American pensioners may have been used to pay some email hackers in the United States or to supply money to intermediaries who would then pay the hackers, the two sources said.
quote:
The working group is scrutinizing the activities of a few Americans who were affiliated with Trump’s campaign or his business empire and of multiple individuals from Russia and other former Soviet nations who had similar connections, the sources said.
Does this give some independent corroboration to the pension stuff that was in one of the Steele memos?
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:21 pm to VOLhalla
Michael Cohen is a pretty common name.
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:23 pm to Decatur
quote:
pay some email hackers
How much does it cost to send a phishing email?
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:25 pm to USMCTiger03
I think it's free to hit SEND, at least with the email services I've used.
Cheap enough to send at scale I imagine.
Cheap enough to send at scale I imagine.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News