- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Expect a media blitz of negative reports on convalescent plasma treatments
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:13 pm to tigersbb
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:13 pm to tigersbb
Reporter said “so is this significant?” FDA guy said, “I’d imagine it significant for the 35 families out of 100 that get to keep their loved ones.”
This post was edited on 8/23/20 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:13 pm to tigersbb
This post was edited on 8/24/20 at 7:29 am
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:14 pm to Mrtommorrow1987
I feel that a 35% increase of survival for a virus with a 1% mortality rate should be considered significant (if my numbers are correct).
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:14 pm to tigersbb
convalescent plasma is pointless. it can't be used on a widespread scale. This is another HC moment. There are at least 3 far far better options. Trump needs better intel. This is ridiculous.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:15 pm to tigersbb
OK, had to turn on CNN 5 mins after that presser and sure enough they are already giving negative reports. Right on cue.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:17 pm to arcalades
I think everyone who shits on this shouldn’t have access to it if they get sick. That’s what I think.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:17 pm to Jacksondevildog
quote:
a 1% mortality rate should be considered significant (if my numbers are correct).
I think it’s closer to a .01% but we’re splitting hairs at this point.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:18 pm to jatilen
quote:
Yep and Pelosi and Schumer will call for investigations.
If Obama had made this announcement they would be advocating for a Nobel prize.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:18 pm to tigersbb
No they won’t. It’s 100% known plasma treatment has been effective
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:22 pm to WhitewaterDawg
quote:
The very first Doctor Fox rolls out shite all over it.
The female doctor? She said the president was to be commended. Twice.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:31 pm to 4evrlsu
No the old coot from Vandy. Looked like he was in the same basement as Biden about to take a nap.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:31 pm to BIGFOOD
quote:
they'll quote 5 sources familiar with the conversations that FDA Director Hahn may have had.
Adam Schiff is already working on his transcript of the meeting.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:37 pm to 4evrlsu
My bad. The second Doctor. The older gentleman from Vandy.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:40 pm to tigersbb
PEER REVIEWED!
But they’ll gladly fire out that new rushed vaccine
But they’ll gladly fire out that new rushed vaccine
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:53 pm to jatilen
If the FDA only approved 100% effective treatments, we would never see another approved treatment again.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 5:58 pm to WhitewaterDawg
quote:
My bad. The second Doctor. The older gentleman from Vandy.
Ah. Missed it. Must have been when my phone rang. John Scott probably loved that.
Posted on 8/23/20 at 6:04 pm to tigersbb
Bad Orangeman. He’s a Russian spy that has stopped all mail and now has a cure for the masses. We can’t have that, what an evil man!! America should be last, not first!!
Posted on 8/23/20 at 7:12 pm to arcalades
quote:
convalescent plasma is pointless. it can't be used on a widespread scale. This is another HC moment. There are at least 3 far far better options. Trump needs better intel. This is ridiculous.
Why are you people so opposed to others having options? No one is forcing anything on anyone. If you find yourself in a position where this or HCQ might help you, please feel free to decline and let someone else have it.
Popular
Back to top

1












