Started By
Message

re: Every brand of everything you own in your home is celebrating homosexuality this month.

Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27117 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Heterosexual


Are you basing that on what you know about Cindy or you are assuming the intent behind the commercial?

quote:

Advertising 101, make men associate your product with sex and hot women.


Are you saying there are not some bull dykes out there craving a Pepsi and some Cindy Crawford right now? Seems awful short sighted of you...
Posted by stampman
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
4919 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Not any more so than heterosexuality being use to market things for, well, ever


Ummmm..Texas A&M fan! Ok now we know what side of the plate you swing from!

Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 1:10 pm to
I’m not assuming anything, I’m telling you what their intent was

And it doesn’t matter if some lesbians liked it to, that’s not who they made the ad for.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17716 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

When you leave college and get into the real world you may realize libertarianism is best left behind on campus


And perhaps you may someday awaken to the reality that Freedom entails the possibility that consenting adults may engage in conduct that you find abhorrent. Such a realization protects the individual liberty of both the hedonist and the virtuous, the heathen and the devout. This is because the larger and more centralized the power of the State, the greater the threat to everyone’s individual liberty.

I certainly do not seek to impose the predominate cultural values of Alabama upon the citizens of, say, San Francisco’s Castro district. Yet that philosophy of “live and let live” should likewise be reciprocated to the citizens of Alabama. This is why as a libertarian, I support the governing principle of subsidiary.


The Subsidiarity Principle....

quote:

....Devolving political power is the first step toward making government smaller and less powerful in our lives. Your local city council may be dumb as a box of rocks or even evil, but at the very least it is far more accessible to you. Its damage is likely to be contained, and your ability to flee its jurisdiction may require nothing more than a cross-town U-Haul rental.

Subsidiarity is the most realistic and pragmatic approach to creating more freedom in our lifetimes. Winning 51% support for supposedly universalist political principles is a daunting challenge, especially for minority libertarians. We would do well instead to consider the Swiss Federal Model , which champions the subsidiarity principle:

Powers are allocated to the Confederation, the cantons and the communes in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity.

The Confederation only undertakes tasks that the cantons are unable to perform or which require uniform regulation by the Confederation.

Under the principle of subsidiarity, nothing that can be done at a lower political level should be done at a higher level.


Imagine Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump campaigning on this idea in 2016: “I can’t claim to know what’s best for Des Moines or Bangor or Anchorage or Phoenix in every situation. I'm not omnipotent, and neither are 500-odd members of Congress. We should leave most things up to the people who actually live in those towns. Vote for me if you agree.”

Subsidiarity is not perfect, just better. Freedom, in the political sense of the word, means the ability to live without government coercion (anarchists and minarchists debate whether all government is inherently coercive). It does not mean the ability to live under broadly agreed-upon liberal norms, simply because truly universalist political norms are so elusive.

Free societies don’t attempt to impose themselves politically on electoral minorities any more than they attempt to impose themselves militarily on neighboring countries. Politically unyoking different constituencies in America makes far more sense than attempting to contain the hatred and division created by mass majority outcomes.

The world is moving toward decentralization, flattening itself and replacing hierarchies with networks. Libertarians should work to move politics and government in the same direction. Subsidiary is real diversity in practice.


This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 8:44 pm
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41675 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 3:51 pm to
Libertarianism is incompatible with a Christian worldview that seeks to honor God in all things, and therefore I cannot accept it.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34141 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Good thing I don’t have a problem with homosexuals then.


I don’t either. However, I don’t feel the need to celebrate the gay lifestyle, especially for a whole month.

My concern is as to when (not if) pedos become the focal point of the leftist umbrella. They are next up on the list for leftists to promote.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110840 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 3:57 pm to
Funny thing is, I've only seen 1 Pride related thing this month outside of this board, but specifically remember at least 2 Pride related things from this month on this board.

So yea, basically the most exposure I get to Pride month is right here on Tiger Droppings. Funny how that works.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17716 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

Wow, maybe you are a little wound up?




You responded to my post above telling me I’m full of b.s. and to frick off. And I’m a little wound up?



Look, I’m here to make friends. And if not friends, “frenemies.”


Now, if you really want to encage in a conversation, great. If you want to exchange profanities, I’m game for that too: you get what you give with me.



quote:


Explain how the government intrusion into private lives has led to the absolute celebration of sexual deviance that we find today within the alphabet community...


Because of the metaphor of the camel’s nose. Once a government has been granted the power to dictate the morality of what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own bedrooms, it permanently opened the door to the government having a purview and say on such matters.


quote:

Further, explain how it is the government's fault that we find ourselves on the slippery slope, WHEN you don't care what people do in their bedrooms in their PRIVATE lives...


I didn’t say I didn’t care. Indeed, whether between homosexuals or heterosexuals, sodomy is inherently an unsanitary and risky sexual fetish.

Yet if consensual, such acts are not crimes against another person like assault or theft. What I don’t care for is an intrusive Police State mechanism that would be necessary to regulate such behavior.

This post was edited on 6/9/21 at 5:23 am
Posted by MIZZOU_JP
Member since Apr 2015
1813 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Good thing I don’t have a problem with homosexuals then.


Tell me you're an A&M fan with out telling me you're an A&M fan.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19227 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

In reality what's needed is a strong authoritarian state that says "if you push degeneracy we will take your business from you"



With the destruction of the church, there’s no one to safeguard and promote moral behavior.

What will happen, and I think we’re seeing it, is that morality and basic virtue will decay with each generation.

We’re at the point where the bottom is falling out.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 4:45 pm
Posted by TitleistProV1X
Member since Nov 2015
3511 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:45 pm to
I gotta hand it to the LGBTQ community. For making up just 4-5% of the entire US population they sure do have a lot of power.
Posted by TexasTiger90
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Jul 2014
3576 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:46 pm to
Because companies pander to their individual markets? This isn't new
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 4:46 pm
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17716 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Libertarianism is incompatible with a Christian worldview that seeks to honor God in all things, and therefore I cannot accept it.


Then you reject the whole of the American Revolution. This nation was founded upon libertarian principles. On that matter there is no debate.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58732 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Then you reject the whole of the American Revolution. This nation was founded upon libertarian principles. On that matter there is no debate.



If the Founding Fathers had been libertarians, we'd all still be subjects of the Crown.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41675 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Then you reject the whole of the American Revolution. This nation was founded upon libertarian principles. On that matter there is no debate.
Libertarianism isn't what this country was founded upon.

No, the founders weren't libertarians who believed that the government cannot coerce others except to prevent coercion (the typical libertarian understanding of liberty, which is you can do whatever you want so long as you don't harm others). Instead, the founders were federalists that believed the federal government should have limited power and authority and that the states were free to govern themselves as they saw fit, within the understanding that they (the states) were to promote the common good. The common good or well-being included the moral good and well-being, which is why they had official state religions/churches and morality laws all over the place. There were regulations on sexuality, prostitution, gambling, and all sorts of vices associated with a Christian worldview that permeated society at the time that run contrary to libertarianism.

The founders wanted limited federal government but promoted the freedom of the states to govern according to their own views of the common (moral) good.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

However, I don’t feel the need to celebrate the gay lifestyle, especially for a whole month.


So….don’t?

quote:

My concern is as to when (not if) pedos become the focal point of the leftist umbrella. They are next up on the list for leftists to promote.


Nah, a push for true pedophilia (sexual attraction to and relationships with pre-pubescent children) will never be normalized in western society.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17716 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

If the Founding Fathers had been libertarians, we'd all still be subjects of the Crown.


Are you kidding?

The Revolution was based upon the radical idea that Natural Rights supersede any temporal Government power. This is a core tenet of libertarianism.

The theory of Natural Law is indeed inherently critical of all political institutions because it’s tenets are immutable, universal and everlasting. To paraphrase Murray Rothbard, any revolt against a tyrannical state is ipso facto a small “l” libertarian movement.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17716 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Libertarianism isn't what this country was founded upon.


You could not be more wrong. The Articles of Confederation was the perhaps the most libertarian charter in human history since it sought to curtail and defuse the power of the national government.

Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17716 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

Nah, a push for true pedophilia (sexual attraction to and relationships with pre-pubescent children) will never be normalized in western society.


It is already happening. After years of being told that talk of a “slippery slope” was an absurd right-wing fantasy, this entire “transgender” agenda has morphed into a grooming session for pedophilia and all other manner of debased behavior.

Video Emerges Of Drag Kid ‘Desmond Is Amazing’ Pretending to Snort Ketamine...







This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 8:50 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46508 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 9:02 pm to
One, drags queens aren’t pedophiles. A large number are heterosexual men who do either as an act or for fun, the rest are homosexual men.

Two, drags queens aren’t transgendered by definition.

Three, nothing involving drag queens is an attempt to “groom pedophilia”, which is a nonsensical claim to begin with.

Finally, the incidents you posted above are rare and only seen ubiquitous to those focused on each individual case.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram