- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Every brand of everything you own in your home is celebrating homosexuality this month.
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:16 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 6/8/21 at 10:16 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
One, drags queens aren’t pedophiles
Nice strawman. I did make not any claim about the sexual proclivities of drag queens or their propensity for pedophilia.
quote:
Two, drags queens aren’t transgendered by definition.
This child is being promoted as a global icon for the LGBTQXYZ community. I’m not going to get lost in the weeds debating you over what the exact definition of these terms in the LGBTQXYZ collective means, but the official website of Desmond identifies the child as “LGBTQ” and “gender fluid.”
Putting that aside, I can’t believe that you are actually white-knighting for the idea that such an overtly sexual lifestyle — which is an inherent part of the drag queen culture — is appropriate for any child. This child Desmond became a cause célèbre for promoting the sexualization of prepubescent children in the MSM.
Make no mistake, this child was used to groom society for the normalization of both pedophilia and “transgenderism.” The manner in which this child was used and abused is not only criminal, it is a monstrous evil.
This post was edited on 6/9/21 at 7:17 am
0
Posted on 6/9/21 at 7:29 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
One, drags queens aren’t pedophiles. A large number are heterosexual men who do either as an act or for fun, the rest are homosexual men.
Two, drags queens aren’t transgendered by definition.
Three, nothing involving drag queens is an attempt to “groom pedophilia”, which is a nonsensical claim to begin with.
Finally, the incidents you posted above are rare and only seen ubiquitous to those focused on each individual case.
Bump so the board can witness Roger taking a knee for unmitigated filth and degeneracy.
I’m starting to suspect Roger is an elaborate troll.
Are Roger and Hank the same poster?
This post was edited on 6/9/21 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 6/9/21 at 8:07 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:Does libertarianism promote the freedom of the individual states to curtail liberty in accordance to their views of the well-being of the people? If so, then I’ll recant my statement. On the other hand, if libertarianism teaches that no level of government should curtail liberty, then my point stands that the founders were federalists, not libertarians.
You could not be more wrong. The Articles of Confederation was the perhaps the most libertarian charter in human history since it sought to curtail and defuse the power of the national government.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 4:38 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Does libertarianism promote the freedom of the individual states to curtail liberty in accordance to their views of the well-being of the people? If so, then I’ll recant my statement. On the other hand, if libertarianism teaches that no level of government should curtail liberty, then my point stands that the founders were federalists, not libertarians.
I’m not even sure we are in disagreement as I said the nation was founded on libertarian principles as the founders rightly recognized that the more centralized and larger the government, the greater the propensity for tyranny. Of course, libertarianism had not yet been developed as a distinct political philosophy at the time of the American Revolution and the founders should be accurately described as classical liberals.
The great libertarian political theorist and historian Murray Rothbard famously quipped that though the Articles of the Confederation was an imperfect document, it was at least a “half-way house for Liberty” and a monumental leap forward in Human Freedom. In contrast, Rothbard argues that the Constitution was a counter-revolutionary document that centralized power into the hands of an elite ruling class.
Patrick Henry and the other Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution for this very reason. It may have taken over 200 years, but can any true supporter of the principles of limited government seriously disagree with the prophetic warnings of the Anti-Federalists?
“When the American spirit was in its youth, the language of America was different: liberty, sir, was then the primary object. But now, sir, the American spirit, assisted by the ropes and chains of consolidation, is about to convert this country into a powerful and mighty empire. Such a government is incompatible with the genius of Republicanism. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this government. What can avail your specious, imaginary balances, your rope-dancing, chain-rattling, ridiculous ideal checks and contrivances?” Patrick Henry, Virginia’s delegate to the First and Second Continental Congress.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 4:46 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Good thing I don’t have a problem with homosexuals then.
I don’t think most people have any problem with two adults having a relationship of their choosing, the problem for a lot of people is setting aside a month to celebrate degeneracy.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 4:57 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
quote:
Cinch Jeans
Just launched a line of Brokeback jeans with a zipper in the back.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 5:37 pm to MIZZOU_JP
quote:
Jizzjarrin
quote:
Good thing I don’t have a problem with homosexuals then.
quote:
Tell me you're an A&M fan with out telling me you're an A&M fan.
Beat me to it.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 5:48 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:I'd agree with you if libertarianism was concerned solely about the federal reach, but it isn't. Libertarianism is concerned with all government reach over the people. The founders wanted a limited federal government and wanted the states to determine how best to govern the people, including with laws and regulations that libertarians would be abhorred by.
I’m not even sure we are in disagreement as I said the nation was founded on libertarian principles as the founders rightly recognized that the more centralized and larger the government, the greater the propensity for tyranny
I could just as easily say that the founders had conservative principles (as we understand them today) rather than strictly libertarian principles that were guiding them. There are some overlaps, obviously, but the kicker is the amount of oversight and limitation of individual freedoms that were tolerated or even promoted by the founders at the state level.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 6:29 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
I don’t think most people have any problem with two adults having a relationship of their choosing
Immediately followed by calling it degeneracy. Seems like you have it problem with it lmao.
Society taking the time to recognize people who have tortured, murdered and forced to live in the shadows as outcasts just because of who they love is a great thing. It's a sign of a society that values people and good will.
Just another example of conservatives being huge pussies that are constantly terrified over anything different from themselves. Getting to watch y'all get your panties in a wad over some trivial bullshite that doesn't effect you in anyway brings me joy. Continue to make yourself miserable, cause it ain't going away. I like to think its punishment for ruining people's lives with this shite for so long.
As time marches on, you're just going to be more and more isolated as your antiquated views literally die off.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 6:35 pm to Fells
quote:
Immediately followed by calling it degeneracy. Seems like you have it problem with it lmao.
Society taking the time to recognize people who have tortured, murdered and forced to live in the shadows as outcasts just because of who they love is a great thing. It's a sign of a society that values people and good will.
Just another example of conservatives being huge pussies that are constantly terrified over anything different from themselves. Getting to watch y'all get your panties in a wad over some trivial bull shite that doesn't effect you in anyway brings me joy. Continue to make yourself miserable, cause it ain't going away. I like to think its punishment for ruining people's lives with this shite for so long.
As time marches on, you're just going to be more and more isolated as your antiquated views literally die off.
Live your life and be humble….that’s my belief. I don’t believe there’s anything worth setting aside a month to observe/celebrate. If you’re making a case that LGBTQ folks have been mistreated therefore they now need recognition for being mistreated I guess we need a month for fat and bald people too…lol!
Posted on 6/9/21 at 6:41 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
I'd agree with you if libertarianism was concerned solely about the federal reach, but it isn't. Libertarianism is concerned with all government reach over the people. The founders wanted a limited federal government and wanted the states to determine how best to govern the people, including with laws and regulations that libertarians would be abhorred by.
Again, I am not sure we are having a disagreement here. Subsidiary is a core principle of libertarianism since any mechanism that serves to defuse centralized power is preferable to a system that entrenches such power.
As a libertarian, I am opposed to the War on Drugs® and believe drug use and possession should not be illegal. I would support an effort to decriminalize marijuana as Colorado recently did. Yet I live in Alabama and accept that a majority of Alabamians would very likely oppose such a move if it ever was put to a vote. I can live with that.
The flip side to that coin is I am opposed to abortion on demand. If a law to further restrict abortion was put to a vote before Alabama citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that a majority of Alabamians would support such a move. The residents of Colorado should likewise be content to live with such a decision.
As the 10th Amendment makes clear, all these hot-topic social issues that so divide the Deep Red and Deep Blue States (abortion, homosexual marriage, drug legalization, etc...) should rightly be decided by the individual States:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
If this line of inquiry interests you, be sure to read the article on subsidiary I posted above by LINK ]Jeff Deist*, president of the Auburn Alabama based Mises Institute:
....Devolving political power is the first step toward making government smaller and less powerful in our lives. Your local city council may be dumb as a box of rocks or even evil, but at the very least it is far more accessible to you. Its damage is likely to be contained, and your ability to flee its jurisdiction may require nothing more than a cross-town U-Haul rental.
* FWIW, Jeff Deist is a devout Christian as was Ron Paul (Deist served as Chief of Staff to Ron Paul when Paul was in Congress.)
This post was edited on 6/9/21 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 6/9/21 at 6:42 pm to Numberwang
I'm enjoying some Maker's Mark right now. Doesn't feel gay.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 7:01 pm to Fells
quote:
Getting to watch y'all get your panties in a wad over some trivial bull shite that doesn't effect you in anyway brings me joy.
Trivial?
Promoting the chemical castration and sexual mutilation of children with fully functional sexual organs under the auspices of this “transgender” agenda is hardly a trivial issue.
It is an act of utter barbarity.
Posted on 6/9/21 at 7:22 pm to Numberwang
They are heterophobic, and pedophilephilic.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News