- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ethics . . . The Woman Who Disabled Sessions Through Recusal, Then Enabled Weissmann
Posted on 7/26/19 at 5:39 am
Posted on 7/26/19 at 5:39 am
Her name is Robin C. Ashton.
Never heard of her?
Neither had I.
She was Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and used her office to instigate Sessions' recusal. She was also the individual who, through ethics oversight, should have called a halt to Mueller's Weissmann hire based on a litany of conflicts. But she didn't. She could have done the same with Zebley and others. But she didn't.
Why?
Because it seems Ashton had her own conflicts.
She was appointed by Eric Holder as Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in Dec 2010. She remained in the position until last year.
To set the perspective, here is a Jan 2011 article about her:
Likewise, Rosenstein could probably have interceded as the Mueller team stacked itself with Democrats. But with a politically neutral Director of OPR, we'd have likely been spared the last two years of Mueller.
It's amazing one unknown b***h could do so much damage.
Never heard of her?
Neither had I.
She was Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and used her office to instigate Sessions' recusal. She was also the individual who, through ethics oversight, should have called a halt to Mueller's Weissmann hire based on a litany of conflicts. But she didn't. She could have done the same with Zebley and others. But she didn't.
Why?
Because it seems Ashton had her own conflicts.
She was appointed by Eric Holder as Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in Dec 2010. She remained in the position until last year.
To set the perspective, here is a Jan 2011 article about her:
quote:In the end, Jeff Sessions owns the disaster of his recusal. He knew Ashton. He knew who and what she was. Yet he allowed her to buffalo him into an unnecessary and devastating recusal. Nonetheless, she happily forced the issue.
Announce bad news on a Friday afternoon, the rule in official Washington goes. Attorney General Eric Holder seems to have a new corollary: Make bad appointments over holiday breaks.
It works. Holder’s announcement on Christmas Eve that he was appointing Robin Ashton as the new head of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) went virtually unnoticed in the press, other than a highly complimentary article in the Washington Post.
That’s unfortunate, considering how important this position is. OPR investigates ethics violations by Justice Department lawyers. It should be headed by someone who does not place partisanship above the law, and who has the highest ethical standards and a sterling reputation. Robin Ashton does not fit that bill. Indeed, Ashton’s antics at DOJ have often been so petty and juvenile that she should be disqualified from serving in any career leadership position at Justice, much less the one responsible for enforcing ethical standards.
...
Ashton may be a “veteran Justice prosecutor,” as the Post called her, but according to lawyers who worked with her at DOJ, she is also a highly political person who was so upset over George Bush’s reelection in 2004 that she angrily vented her frustration to her colleagues in the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA) — of which she was a deputy director — and made no effort to hide her contempt for President Bush or his administration.
Ashton’s bad reputation goes beyond partisan grievance. Two former directors of EOUSA were interviewed in 2006 by the House Judiciary Committee during its investigation of the firing of nine U.S. attorneys. According to someone familiar with the entire transcripts of those interviews (which are not public), the directors were scathing in their criticism. Ashton reportedly would go through the desk of one former director, Mary Beth Buchanan, when she was out of the office, rifling through confidential files and documents. Ashton was also characterized by former colleagues as completely untrustworthy — someone who treated subordinates like chattel while she did everything possible to ingratiate herself with her bosses, often claiming credit for work that others had done. This sounds more like the behavior of a less-than-stellar high-school student than that of a DOJ lawyer.
Ashton’s political loyalties were demonstrated emphatically by her request to be detailed to the office of Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, one of the fiercest and most partisan liberal Democrats in the Senate. The Justice Department acquiesced to Ashton’s request and actually paid her salary while she worked in Leahy’s office, helping him attack the Bush administration’s Justice Department. As one Justice Department lawyer who worked with Ashton told me, “You don’t do a detail with Patrick Leahy if you’re not a committed, solid Democrat whose political loyalty Leahy would never question.”
...
“Given her partisan instincts and the loyalty she feels to the current attorney general,” one former DOJ lawyer told me, “there is no way that Robin Ashton will allow any report to come out that criticizes Eric Holder or his deputies.” Moreover, the lawyers in OPR and the IG’s office know that from a standpoint of professional advancement within Justice, their own careers would suffer if they came out with such a report.
LINK
Likewise, Rosenstein could probably have interceded as the Mueller team stacked itself with Democrats. But with a politically neutral Director of OPR, we'd have likely been spared the last two years of Mueller.
It's amazing one unknown b***h could do so much damage.
This post was edited on 7/26/19 at 5:41 am
Posted on 7/26/19 at 5:47 am to NC_Tigah
Obama corrupted every federal office to the core
Posted on 7/26/19 at 6:01 am to NC_Tigah
Obama and his government remnants are a fricking pestilence.
If Trump does get re-elected, he needs to lay waste to the bureaucracy just to get rid of these frickers.
If Trump does get re-elected, he needs to lay waste to the bureaucracy just to get rid of these frickers.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 6:04 am to NC_Tigah
The swamp is more like a bottomless portal to hell at this point.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 6:05 am to udtiger
Obama fundamentally changed ..........
Posted on 7/26/19 at 6:48 am to NC_Tigah
Looks like they had this coup well plotted out. You know a large chunk of bureaucrats probably are just like this. It is what flipped Virginia from red to blue.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 7:05 am to Strannix
quote:
Obama corrupted every federal office to the core
He was a stain on our country and an enemy. We knew this but the communist media propped him up, never vetted the halfrican. Our government is the enemy of the people now.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 7:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Ashton may be a “veteran Justice prosecutor,” as the Post called her, but according to lawyers who worked with her at DOJ, she is also a highly political person who was so upset over George Bush’s reelection in 2004 that she angrily vented her frustration to her colleagues in the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA) — of which she was a deputy director — and made no effort to hide her contempt for President Bush or his administration.
Doesn’t this somewhat fall on GEOTUS and his team to weed out the hacks properly? If she had such disdain for republican presidents or just republicans in general, surely someone did their homework on her seeing how important her role was.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 7:32 am to BeefDawg
quote:Stories like this are illustrative of how deep the swamp is. When all the anti-Trump leaks were emanating from the WH, the MSM intimated they were coming from Trump's own folks. There is no way in hell someone like Robin Ashton wasn't feeding that beast. Just disgusting.
The swamp
Posted on 7/26/19 at 7:49 am to NC_Tigah
In a sense Jeff Sessions owns, through his weakness, one of the most destructive periods in modern American history. He is typical of putting some strange sense of personal honor or family honor before duty and calling. A very destructive and very Republican trait. Suckers and fools Those folks are in the modern political realm.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 7:53 am to NC_Tigah
Yea I member this shite! I apologize to the Country for the Keebler being from Alabama.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:07 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
She was appointed by Eric Holder
Thread/
Eric Holder, the perpetual race-baiting POS who never even acknowledged that he got Ferguson 100% wrong. Of course, when you and your boss have an AGENDA to destroy race relations in America, why concern yourself with FACTS?
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:09 am to KingOrange
Sessions’ recusal was a huge mistake for him and DJT. Once done, the Insurance Policy became real with the ‘Mueller-in-name-only Investigation and Witch Hunt Council’. Once recused, Sessions couldn’t un-recuse for political reasons. And DJT couldn’t fire Mueller or Sessions for the same reason – interference in an investigation, better known as obstruction.
If Jeff un-recused and then fired Mueller, Trump would take a huge PR hit – obstruction - and lose public support; not something DJT’s advisors would let him do. Heck, if Sessions had resigned before the mid-terms, the same political problems would arise, since Jeff would have been forced out, which would have given Dims better chances of flipping more Senate an Rep seats. Could only imagine the “Mentally ill”, “Unstable behavior” and “Mean and petty with his cabinet” headlines for months on end.
If DJT fired Mueller, the same problems arise. Plus, loss of public support may have forced his swamp-ridden Repubs to urge his resignation.
You only have to look at what resulted after Sessions resigned to notice the impact on the ‘Policy’. Mueller’s council wrote a report, folded, and ran to the bank after bilking the public of 32mil. Outside of the Mueller thing, Sessions did not perform badly. In light of my argument, he fell on his sword for his country and for DJT. Not ashamed of him being from Alabama.
Let’s hope the Holdher Oblameo leftovers are cleaned out sooner than later. They are like flesh-eating bacteria on the rule of law and the foundations of our nation. Good riddance OPR witchy woman, no thanks for your disservice.
If Jeff un-recused and then fired Mueller, Trump would take a huge PR hit – obstruction - and lose public support; not something DJT’s advisors would let him do. Heck, if Sessions had resigned before the mid-terms, the same political problems would arise, since Jeff would have been forced out, which would have given Dims better chances of flipping more Senate an Rep seats. Could only imagine the “Mentally ill”, “Unstable behavior” and “Mean and petty with his cabinet” headlines for months on end.
If DJT fired Mueller, the same problems arise. Plus, loss of public support may have forced his swamp-ridden Repubs to urge his resignation.
You only have to look at what resulted after Sessions resigned to notice the impact on the ‘Policy’. Mueller’s council wrote a report, folded, and ran to the bank after bilking the public of 32mil. Outside of the Mueller thing, Sessions did not perform badly. In light of my argument, he fell on his sword for his country and for DJT. Not ashamed of him being from Alabama.
Let’s hope the Holdher Oblameo leftovers are cleaned out sooner than later. They are like flesh-eating bacteria on the rule of law and the foundations of our nation. Good riddance OPR witchy woman, no thanks for your disservice.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:17 am to SagesSon
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 completely undermined the exectuive's authority. The fact that we have two parties that continuously come in and out of power, yet the executive agencies' day to day operations are run by the same people regardless is pure stupidity. It is exacerbated with Trump by how many of his agencies simply ignore his instructions. The executive should have unequivocal power to fire and hire anyone he wants to fulfill his agenda.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 8:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
It's amazing one unknown b***h could do so much damage.
And that right there is the deep state. DC is a sewer. And the bigger that central government grows, the more dangerous it becomes for normal citizens. President Trump helps, but long-term, I do not feel good about our future.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 9:05 am to NC_Tigah
The point that I reiterate a lot around here is this: FedGov is irredeemably corrupted by the Left because the Left has infiltrated just about every FedGov institution and agency.
What need will there be for any future Dem POTUS to endorse any significantly controversial-Leftist legislation when the non-elected FedGov institutions and agencies can enact Leftist Policy via agency-rulemaking powers and institutional decisions?
Conversely, what chance does any truly Nationalist POTUS have to enact his policies when he is opposed by the Judiciary, along with the FedGov Bureaucratic Staat? Then when the Trump POTUS can't enact his policy because FedGov actively resists, mass media can trumpet the Trump's ineffectiveness and incompetence.
This is a BIG part of the reason why I make the argument that the USA is in the End Phase of its existence as a free nation-state. Leftism will be the law of the land here through the operation of two forces: Leftist FedGov non-elected rule-making and indoctrinated masses who vote Leftist.
These two historical forces, I see no way of stopping them. If any of you can offer a solution to what I say, please do so. I would love to read a counter-argument.
What need will there be for any future Dem POTUS to endorse any significantly controversial-Leftist legislation when the non-elected FedGov institutions and agencies can enact Leftist Policy via agency-rulemaking powers and institutional decisions?
Conversely, what chance does any truly Nationalist POTUS have to enact his policies when he is opposed by the Judiciary, along with the FedGov Bureaucratic Staat? Then when the Trump POTUS can't enact his policy because FedGov actively resists, mass media can trumpet the Trump's ineffectiveness and incompetence.
This is a BIG part of the reason why I make the argument that the USA is in the End Phase of its existence as a free nation-state. Leftism will be the law of the land here through the operation of two forces: Leftist FedGov non-elected rule-making and indoctrinated masses who vote Leftist.
These two historical forces, I see no way of stopping them. If any of you can offer a solution to what I say, please do so. I would love to read a counter-argument.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 9:17 am to NC_Tigah
I'm totally stealing this. Are you on Twitter, NC?
Posted on 7/26/19 at 9:20 am to NC_Tigah
The SES is the most dangerous facet to our federal government, because it IS the Deep State Swamp.
For that reason, I was a little disappointed when DJT announced the next two years' spending bills were set. I was hoping for another shutdown, so he could axe the entire SES on Day 31 of a shutdown.
For that reason, I was a little disappointed when DJT announced the next two years' spending bills were set. I was hoping for another shutdown, so he could axe the entire SES on Day 31 of a shutdown.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 9:23 am to VoxDawg
quote:Rarely.
I'm totally stealing this. Are you on Twitter, NC?
NC Tigah (@nc_tigah) | Twitter
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News