- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ***Edit** texts released nothing burger confirmed!! On to the next fabricated crisis!
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:27 am to rmnldr
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:27 am to rmnldr
I don't know enough to know whether that content in Signal is a problem. I think it's definitely true the recklessness of Goldberg being in the chat was the biggest issue.
Trying to be as objective as possible, it's probably a pretty egregious issue to share those "plans" with a journalist that hates the administration (and the country FWIW). I think practically, the risk/impact is negligible, so it's really a breach of opsec in a more academic sense, but it's still a meaningful breach.
In short, the administration should downplay, make fun of Goldberg and move on quickly, and then quietly take serious action internally, which is probably already happening. I don't care who is punished or how, but it's a pretty serious screw up. It's just not something I'm willing to argue with the left about considering they are completely disinterested in the massive, impactful lies their folks have sold to the country in recent years.
Trying to be as objective as possible, it's probably a pretty egregious issue to share those "plans" with a journalist that hates the administration (and the country FWIW). I think practically, the risk/impact is negligible, so it's really a breach of opsec in a more academic sense, but it's still a meaningful breach.
In short, the administration should downplay, make fun of Goldberg and move on quickly, and then quietly take serious action internally, which is probably already happening. I don't care who is punished or how, but it's a pretty serious screw up. It's just not something I'm willing to argue with the left about considering they are completely disinterested in the massive, impactful lies their folks have sold to the country in recent years.
4
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:29 am to Pettifogger
quote:
In short, the administration should downplay, make fun of Goldberg and move on quickly
quote:
Pettifogger
make fun of him about what?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:29 am to 4cubbies
quote:Where have I stated that?
You are justifying a misstep by this administration by saying "its ok because Biden did it, too."
quote:God dam you are one dumb frick.
Or are you going to throw another tantrum and deny that now too?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:29 am to jbdawgs03
Just like I said yesterday. Dems and media flailing and create bullshite because that’s all they have.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:30 am to Decatur
WHERE ARE THE TARGETS? Not mentioned
WHO ARE THE TARGETS? Not Mentioned
DOES IT MENTION YEMEN? Nope
WHO ARE THE TARGETS? Not Mentioned
DOES IT MENTION YEMEN? Nope
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:30 am to TDTOM
quote:Indeed, better get to the bottom of this shite.
In a different thread, someone said that Goldberg's number was listed under a different name in the directory. If this is true, then something is fricky.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:30 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
This time, however, I think Goldberg established his point: this WAS sensitive material that shouldn't have been disclosed to unauthorized personnel.
The biggest “duh” statement in the thread. It was “sensitive/no-foriegn” but no where near “classified”.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:30 am to 4cubbies
quote:
make fun of him about what?
For being a fake news liberal male democrat
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:30 am to 4cubbies
quote:
make fun of him about what?
Being a subversive, anti-American, pathetic spineless jelly of a man?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:31 am to Jbird
melt confirmed. This really rattled your entire worldview, didn't it? Poor thing.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:32 am to Jbird
Can anyone explain how this was not intentional to harm this administration?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:32 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This really rattled your entire worldview, didn't it?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:33 am to rmnldr
quote:
It being revealed to a journalist in an insecure chat about when a carrier is commencing flight ops is a big fricking deal
Once again you misstate things to make them look bad or are just naive!
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:34 am to dafif
quote:
Can anyone explain how this was not intentional to harm this administration?
you mean by Waltz?
It sounds to me like growing pains/competency issues coming from a combination of an administration filled with a lot of folks new to government (a good thing) and government/opsec/etc. protocols (maybe not a good thing) and the use of a less protocol-driven platform for communication than I assume is often used (Signal).
I'd guess there wasn't a nefarious motive here, but it's not impossible.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:34 am to 4cubbies
Wow, you are an ignorant brainwashed person I no longer feel sorry for.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:35 am to jbdawgs03
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:36 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Being a subversive, anti-American, pathetic spineless jelly of a man?
Trump admin fricks up and your suggested appropriate response is to make fun of the person this administration roped into their frickup. Maybe I shouldn't be, but I am surprised by MAGAs leaning into the ignorant hillbilly trope.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:36 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
As a Trump supporter, unfortunately, I think nothing will happen. Rather than admitting a mistake and explaining how it happened, I think the Administration will engage in personal attacks and rave about the efficacy of the mission.
So what did Trump do yesterday in the cabinet meeting. What did Waltz do last night on Fox? Come on dude, they have come out and said exactly that? Just admit you want a head on a pole!
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:36 am to BigPerm30
quote:Boasberg taking a case to sue Sec Def Hegseth et al....because they used Signal takes the cake.
Just like I said yesterday. Dems and media flailing and create bullshite because that’s all they have.
Meanwhile Bondi screams on Hannity. Wasted days and wasted nights...
Posted on 3/26/25 at 9:37 am to Pettifogger
quote:
I don't know enough to know whether that content in Signal is a problem.
It is. The Signal protocol is secure enough, but you're still left with other security problems like access vulnerabilities, repudiation, spearphishing, etc.
That's why it's approved with limitations. Nothing that could be considered remotely sensitive should be discussed there. They have classified devices for that shite. They were just being lazy.
Page 7 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News