- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. Steve Turley with a really good video that explains the FTX corruption.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/17/22 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How does that work with private donations?
when recipients of laundered money donate that same money..
what other intellectually corrupt questions do you have?
1
Posted on 11/17/22 at 12:52 pm to cwill
quote:early take seems you are doing work on this caper done by who WE DO NOT KNOW
Assuming you’re referring to ftx, which is the topic of this thread, the missing billions currently appears to be the result of massive fraud and in some cases straight up misappropriation, not laundering.
independent views - no involvement by virtue of they may be involved
This post was edited on 11/17/22 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 11/17/22 at 12:56 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
when recipients of laundered money donate that same money..
Are you saying that a major international effort of small donations mostly involves each of those donors to have received laundered money? How does THAT work, exactly?
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
Vindman Rule...hearsay is now evidence.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:06 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
early take seems you are doing work on this caper done by who WE DO NOT KNOW independent views - no involvement by virtue of they may be involved
Early take: word salad.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you saying that a major international effort of small donations mostly involves each of those donors to have received laundered money? How does THAT work, exactly?
And it’s sent to a Ukraine bank account then has to get out of that…a second laundering?
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:08 pm to riccoar
quote:
How about we American's just ask for a full transparent audit of the entire $90 plus billion sent to Ukraine thus far?
Lolololol
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Y'all keep screaming there is no evidence of US funds being funneled back to politicians but this is real early in the process. Do you have unequivocal proof that it didn't happen? No - absolutely not. Strange hill to die on so early in a fraudulent investigation (assuming the Democrats allow an investigation to take place).
Yes and the 2 have nothing to do with each other. The scale alone doesn't work. The charity handed like $100M max. You're still missing 80-90% of the money FTX moved to Alameda.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:33 pm to GumboPot
anyone that looks at that "CEO" and says that is someone who I want to invest my money in and he should be CEO deserves to lose their money.
Dude looks dumb as hell and should not even be allowed to count pennies much less run a crypto exchange.
Dude looks dumb as hell and should not even be allowed to count pennies much less run a crypto exchange.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:37 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Y'all keep screaming there is no evidence of US funds being funneled back to politicians but this is real early in the process. Do you have unequivocal proof that it didn't happen?
This is an example of a complete misunderstanding of citing and relying on evidence v speculation.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:37 pm to AubieinNC2009
I'd like to know how he got his initial funding. The arbitrage trade story smells fishy.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:39 pm to AubieinNC2009
quote:
Dude looks dumb as hell
He’s objectively intelligent on paper, but we are in the middle of an iq bubble.
However, I have a strong inclination to consider anyone involved in crypto losing everything is well deserved since the whole thing is an obvious ponzi.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:43 pm to cwill
quote:you are the one requiring special care
Early take: word salad.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:44 pm to cwill
quote:doing unprecedented level of work on this one
This is an example of a complete misunderstanding of citing and relying on evidence v speculation.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 1:56 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Do you have unequivocal proof that it didn't happen?
Do you understand the logical issues of proving a negative?
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:11 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
I'd like to know how he got his initial funding. The arbitrage trade story smells fishy.
Agreed. If it was that easy and that well-known, someone else would’ve done it. Plus, it sounds like it hasn’t worked since then. Otherwise Alameda wouldn’t be bankrupt.
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:16 pm to GumboPot
Thanks for sharing…
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Someone had better get on it then. I've seen way more written about how it was done that just a; nuh-uh!
Do you understand the logical issues of proving a negative?
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:31 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
I've seen way more written about how it was done
Nothing of substance about Ukraine "investing" in FTX, though.
You've likely seen that FTX handled trasnfering donations to Ukraine into crypto, but that isn't related to the alleged scheme b/c it's not nearly big enough.
So, other than the charity association, do you have?
Posted on 11/17/22 at 2:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Way more than that if you go look for it.
Nothing of substance about Ukraine "investing" in FTX, though.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News