- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. McCullough:Study shows Pfizer vax reverse transcribes & installs DNA into human genome
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:18 pm to FlexDawg
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:18 pm to FlexDawg
By that metric, should I trust Fauci over McCullough because of Fauci's prodigious publication record, including editing one of the most widely referenced textbooks in all of medicine? Or is your appeal to authority nonsensical? Who can tell?
1
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:20 pm to Geauxgurt
Purebloods don't really have to clamp onto any belief. We don't have to convince ourselves we're genetic scientists or know which studies are flawed and which highly respected cardiologists suddenly went cuckoo. If we're wrong it's ok. Life just goes on.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:20 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
They want to trust a cardiologist over geneticists and doctors/scientists that actually are experts in this particular area.
Aren’t scientists paid to spew govt propaganda regarding climate change? Totally made up bs. You somehow think it works differently with vaccines?
I’ll side with the experts that the government attacks. Sadly, we live in a world where you know who is credible by how much they are censored by big brother.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:21 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
By that metric, should I trust Fauci over McCullough because of Fauci's prodigious publication record, including editing one of the most widely referenced textbooks in all of medicine? Or is your appeal to authority nonsensical? Who can tell?
Does the government censor Fauci? That’s how you know who is a fraud and who isn’t.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:23 pm to Damone
quote:
Isn't this the nutjob who was trying to launder his anti-vax sentiments by claiming to be employed by Baylor, when in reality he had been canned months before?
Whatever lets you sleep at night
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:25 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
You somehow think it works differently with vaccines?
If it does, I want some of that cash.
quote:
Sadly, we live in a world where you know who is credible by how much they are censored by big brother.
I'm being censored by Big Endocrinology and Big Genomics because my paper on metabolic syndrome in which I am lead author is still in review. It's a sham I tell you!
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:32 pm to FlexDawg
quote:
That’s how you know who is a fraud and who isn’t.
Oh so it is publication record when relevant (i.e., trying to drown out criticism) and censorship when the appeal to authority falls apart. I see. Was it censorship when he published an early treatment protocol for COVID-19 in a journal published by Elsevier? Does it count as censorship when he testified in both the US Senate and then the Texas Senate? It doesn't seem like his ideas are all that censored to me.
This post was edited on 7/11/22 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:32 pm to FlexDawg
You are trusting the wrong science, a-hole.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:33 pm to Damone
quote:
Dr. McCullough
Isn't this the nutjob who was trying to launder his anti-vax sentiments by claiming to be employed by Baylor, when in reality he had been canned months before?
Why don’t you look it up as opposed to throwing some semi arse shite out on the website?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:34 pm to FlexDawg
Vaccine so safe....So effective!
It has to have emergency use authorization to even be on the market and its maker has to have full immunity from lawsuits.
It has to have emergency use authorization to even be on the market and its maker has to have full immunity from lawsuits.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:37 pm to Geauxgurt
All the tinfoil hats have their fingers in their ears.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:39 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
geneticists and doctors/scientists that actually are experts in this particular area
Are these the guys that told us you couldnt get the virus if vaccinated? Also, created Paxlovid as a treatment, and then Dr Falsi said not to take it because it causes reinfections? Told us early on that we didnt have enough ventilators, only to find out they were furthering infections?
Those experts?
lulz
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:42 pm to FlexDawg
I’ll let covid take my arse before I get an mRNA jab.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:44 pm to FlexDawg
I'm smart enough to know not to believe everything I read on this board or anywhere else on the internet for that matter and to also know that the truth lies somewhere between what I see on the internet and what I hear in the media.
That said, I know for a 100% FACT that I got sick maybe 10 times in my entire life before getting the first two Pfizer shots last spring. Since getting the second shot (and my last one, frick the booster) in April 2021, I have been very sick three times. THREE TIMES in a little over a year. That's not normal at all for me and I blame the vaccine. I wholeheartedly believe the shot lowered my overall immune system.
That said, I know for a 100% FACT that I got sick maybe 10 times in my entire life before getting the first two Pfizer shots last spring. Since getting the second shot (and my last one, frick the booster) in April 2021, I have been very sick three times. THREE TIMES in a little over a year. That's not normal at all for me and I blame the vaccine. I wholeheartedly believe the shot lowered my overall immune system.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:45 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Are these the guys that told us you couldnt get the virus if vaccinated?
I don't recall any legitimate scientist saying you could not get the virus if vaccinated. I heard platitudes about that, but actual scientists from the get go knew the vaccines most likely benefit was to reduce the complications of the virus. Yes, in many it may block infection, but there is no such thing as perfect immunity from any vaccine.
In the end, believe what you want, as apparently you only listen to the side that supports your predisposed beliefs. Looking at both sides with a critical can be left to us.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:47 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
The major problem here is many of these people simply clamp onto anything to justify their belief that the vaccines are pure evil, even when the studies are flawed or worse not even making the claims they are.
Hey, which studies are more flawed? The ones in the OP here? Or the ones stating the vaccines would prevent Covid?
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:48 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
I have been very sick three times. THREE TIMES in a little over a year. That's not normal at all for me and I blame the vaccine. I wholeheartedly believe the shot lowered my overall immune system.
You also realize that in the time before April 2021, you weren't spending significant amounts of time isolated from other people, right?
I am not going to sit here and tell you it is NOT from the vaccine, but the more likely reasoning is that by not getting exposed continuously to small amounts of infectious things due to over-kill lockdowns, we dampened our immune systems and they are not as effective.
That is why people that tend to isolate a lot (even pre-pandemic) have historically been more susceptible to getting ill. Exposure helps prime your immune system. Lack of exposure puts it on sleep mode rather than standby.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:50 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:You probably said it yourself on the internet
I don't recall any legitimate scientist saying you could not get the virus if vaccinated.
I'm glad you are now, retroactively, able to suss out who is a legitimate scientist and who is not but for the millions of Americans who believed the "top scientists" as promoted by our government and media, they may feel a bit lied to.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:52 pm to FlexDawg
When any answer you give will only dig you deeper into the well of stupidity, post a meme.
Posted on 7/11/22 at 2:52 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
2) It was run in vitro (on a dish), which means absolutely nothing in regards to in vivo (in an actual subject).
While this may be true, is it possible that what happens in an actual subject could be worse? Affect more than just the liver?
What this tells me is that it is possible. We are going to continue to tinker with this MRNA vaccine and we will continue to inject these vaccines into millions of people. Don't you think we should at least admit that we don't really know if there will be long term effects or if this could possibly change your DNA?
Now the question I have is: IF this does turn out to have harmful effects, how confident are you that our government will come clean and admit it?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News