re: Dozens of missing children,some as young as just one year old rescued from sex traffickers

Doesn't matter if it were just 1.....you psychotic loser

Or, as you can see, Satanism.

quote:

---

SFP sees a shiny object and has some idiotic preconceived notion about it. But instead of bouncing ideas off of others in order to explore alternative thinking, SFP is compelled to vomit that idiotic idea

---

SFP does not strike me as a person who chases laser pointers on the floor.

Does he have preconceptions and established positions on most issues at this point in his life? Almost certainly. Does he defend them doggedly, when they are challenged? Absolutely.

But I feel certain that his views were developed over years of observation and analysis. I am equally certain that some of them have changed through the years, as additional information has become available.

Does he change many of his positions as a result of discussions here? I doubt it. "You are a cuck and a commie" is not generally a very convincing argument for someone as methodical as he clearly is.

quote:

---

Doesn't matter if it were just 1

---

It does. Just look at the post following your post

quote:

---

Kill them. Don't even waste time with a trial. Send a clear message.

---

You think he's talking about the custody kidnappings? Naw. He thinks 9 were arrested for sex trafficking.

His response perfectly encapsulates the fruits of the dishonesty.

quote:

---

Or, as you can see, Satanism.

---

So now custody disputes are Satanic?

quote:

---

And the Satanic Panic is relevant to the thread. The OP was posted by a Q-baw. These threads get intense because "trafficking" is term that has multiple meanings - it means one thing to LEO's under still relatively new definitions that the public hasn't entirely caught up with, something else to average citizens, and something else entirely to anons (satanic ritualistic abuse among other related narratives).

---

It's always refreshing to see someone else be able to just explain the (rather clear) large issues in play.

These threads are always a fricking disaster, too. The irony is that the people "fricking the thread up" are the ones manipulated into emotionally responding as if this was an actual discussion on sex trafficking. In their ignorance they fail to realize that's not really the subject at hand, but due to their NPC nature and being easily manipulated, that's where it goes.

The craziest part is that making truthful statements such as:

1. Not all trafficking is sex trafficking;
2. Not all sexual abuse is sex trafficking.
3. The author of the article dishonestly used "sex trafficking" when the underlying story isn't reported that way, and most of these cases are custodial kidnappings having nothing to do with sex/

you get the ABSOLUTELY insane responses like

"So you're saying sex trafficking doesn't exist?" or

"Oh look at you defending sex traffickers and pedos"

The cherry on top is when the few who have enough intelligence to realize their failures cope-pivot to comments like that I'm focusing on nuance, or that somehow I am the one backtracking

Like I said earlier, there is a reason why certain topics get more focus from me. The aboslute insanity on display is just incredible. The INCREDIBLY interesting observation is how there is so much overlap on the "wrong" side. Plenty on the Nuss Buss all believed Flynn was better than JR, too.

TDSFP - "NUH UH!!!! "

lol yes. Nobody’s denying abuse exists. The problem is that “trafficking” now covers everything from custody disputes to cartel shite, so everyone’s yelling about a different movie in their head.

quote:

---

Then pointing out this inaccuracy and dishonesty leads to hilarious results

---

So here he admits that he enjoys trolling people in threads about human trafficking because he thinks it's funny.

quote:

---

So here he admits that he enjoys trolling people

---

No.

I admit that I point out inaccuracy and dishonesty

The people like you create the hilarious results. I don't know why, exactly, but it always happens.