- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Donald Trump bears responsibility for Jan. 6 attack, Jack Smith argues in new filing.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 1:53 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 10/16/24 at 1:53 pm to Bunk Moreland
Jack better be updating up his resume, he will be unemployed Jan 20th.
1
Posted on 10/16/24 at 1:54 pm to Bunk Moreland
I hope Trump finds a way to put Jack Smith in prison.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 1:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
DC 3 judge panel? Ha ha ha good luck with that! Supreme court will quash that bullschit.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 1:56 pm to UFMatt
quote:
Jack better be updating up his resume, he will be unemployed Jan 20th.
CNN or MSNBC will hire him.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 1:57 pm to FairAndBalanced
quote:
Didn’t Trump just get caught secretly talking to Putin again this week. The country that funded all his business operations after the banks cut him off and clearly has some dirt on the man is just all a bunch of made up malarkey? Pull your head out of the sand dumbass. Trump lied to you and you fell for it. You were an easy mark.
The wall is almost completely covered in shite now. You need to slow down on your throwing.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:00 pm to RedHog260
quote:
DC 3 judge panel?
Yes. It's quite relevant when discussing a prosecution in the DC district court.
quote:
Ha ha ha good luck with that!
No luck is needed, it's currently the law.
quote:
Supreme court will quash that bullschit.
So we went from "You lying POS." to "I hope the Supreme Court rules the way I want at some indiscriminate point in the future"
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I call Hilldawg's coup attempt "Russiagate."
I'll tell you one way conservatives/MAGA reacted to Russiagate: giving a shite.
Awwww the commie airhead missed it. Another unlawfully appointed special prosecutor, Mueller. Russiagates BS hero.
Mueller not legally appointed.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:01 pm to TDTOM
quote:
The wall is almost completely covered in shite now.
trying to figure out which alter this is. A few more posts should be enough
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
DC 3 judge panel?
Yes. It's quite relevant when discussing a prosecution in the DC district court.
quote:
Ha ha ha good luck with that!
No luck is needed, it's currently the law.
quote:
Supreme court will quash that bullschit.
So we went from "You lying POS." to "I hope the Supreme Court rules the way I want at some indiscriminate point in the future"
It is not currently the law airhead. Prove otherwise. It is what the leftist scum are trying to pass off as law, there is a big difference.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:04 pm to RedHog260
quote:
Mueller not legally appointed.
A Law Review article is not more valid than an appellate decision.
This is their baby. They created the sham argument (that has been rejected every time it's been tested except this last one with Cannon).
Regardless, you said this post was "lying"
quote:
The Court of Appeals in the DC Circuit has ruled (in other cases) this appointment method is valid.
Explain to me how that comment is "lying", given I've cited one of the rulings by the DCCOA that I referenced.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:04 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:The second paragraph is a duh.
They did hurt 50 Secret Service agents in 2020 and the press cried that it was a massacre when police responded.
The right will want the book thrown at anyone who tries to stop a Trump win. The difference is FBI and DOJ won't do anything.
What are you talking about in the first paragraph?
Jack Smith and J6th are all they have. Jack Smith's writings are nothing but oppo research for the democrats. The travesty is him still collecting millions in billable hours.
They are so desperate with cackle laugh at the helm... They show two Karen's on CNN saying J6 Insurrection stops them from voting for Trump. CNN and MSM reads them Jack's writings like the OP.
It is a mind jedi trick to get people riled up enough to vote for a mindless Kamala, or sit home and not vote for Jill Stein.
They are so desperate, they are holding off announcing his office closing because that humanizes and helps Trump.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:04 pm to RedHog260
quote:
Awwww the commie airhead missed it.
He;s literally arguing for progressives.
Dont buy his "libertarian schtick.:"
No Libertarian would buy Democrat conspiracy theories.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:05 pm to RedHog260
quote:
It is not currently the law airhead. Prove otherwise.
I literally linked you the DCCOA ruling making it the law within their circuit.
quote:
It is what the leftist scum are trying to pass off as law, there is a big difference.
No it's the law. I gave you the ruling.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:06 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
They are so desperate
They still hold on to their precious conspiracies while pushing a woman into office who wasnt even elected by her party.
"My Democracy."
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:07 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
They're weren't all angels, brotha.
Certainly not like the BLM angels who gathered in 'mostly peaceful' protests during the "summer of love" in 2020.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:08 pm to Bunk Moreland
Wait has Bunk gone the way of SFP and Bill Kristol and Hank?
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:10 pm to ReauxlTide222
Me and Bunk have been sympatico on most issues once he got his head out of the Q nonsense. We disagree on some aspects of the Ukraine situation/history.
But you see, Bunk isn't a psycho, so we can co-exist while disagreeing on one issue. We don't see each other as out-group members for only 99% compliance.
But you see, Bunk isn't a psycho, so we can co-exist while disagreeing on one issue. We don't see each other as out-group members for only 99% compliance.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:11 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Wait has Bunk gone the way of SFP and Bill Kristol and Hank?
Bunk usually is smart enough to offer that the opinion stated is someone elsense, not his.
SFP is playing Progressive here, and there is a massive difference.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
In other cases?You mean this one?
John Danforth/Waco
There have only been three and all have been failures of epic proportion and nothing more than either political hit jobs or attempts at distortion of fact.
John Danforth/Waco
There have only been three and all have been failures of epic proportion and nothing more than either political hit jobs or attempts at distortion of fact.
Posted on 10/16/24 at 2:17 pm to RedHog260
quote:
In other cases?You mean this one?
John Danforth/Waco
quote:
Despite the outpouring of military assistance and training, the advice of military experts, the use of classified military technology, the deployment of military special operations personnel, and the FBI’s success in resolving previous exceptional crises, there were no winners at Waco. After reviewing his final report in context, I cannot accept John Danforth’s conclusion that the armed forces “conducted themselves properly and commendably” at Waco.101 There are just too many deviations, inconsistencies, omissions, errors, and irregularities that emerge from a comparison of the government’s own sources. One is left with the uneasy feeling that the Waco critical incident revealed the increasingly collaborative relationship among civil and military forces in the United States. While this collaboration may be viewed by some as necessary to ensure domestic tranquility, its weakening of the principle of separation between law enforcement and the armed forces must be openly acknowledged and discussed. Are we as a nation ready to cast aside a principle that has protected civilians from their own military forces since 1878? To paraphrase John Danforth, the best immunization against pervasive public cynicism is government openness and candor. Unfortunately, Danforth’s “Final Report” excised this worthy caveat and replaced it with a hermeneutical defense of the unprecedented use of the armed forces in a federal police operation against armed American citizens on Texas soil.
No, not that one. That's not a case, let alone one of a federal appellate court, and it has literally nothing to do with our discussion.
I already gave you the literal case and ruling. I linked you directly to the COA decision and gave you an article summarizing it.
This post was edited on 10/16/24 at 2:18 pm
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News