- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ drops charges against man who gave out face shields
Posted on 7/30/25 at 6:57 am to cardswinagain
Posted on 7/30/25 at 6:57 am to cardswinagain
He sang Felize Navidad on who funded the obstruction of justice. Now he has a Margarita date in El Salvador.
0
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:02 am to cardswinagain
Makes ya realize that the doj isn't serious about charging those domestic terrorists as domestic terrorists. Because if they were serious... then not only would those terrorists be charged with domestic terrorism, everyone who provided them with material resources and funding would also be arrested and charged with domestic terrorism.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:08 am to CuyahogaTigerJr
quote:
quote:
Not sure there are federal charges that cover what he did.
==
Hahaha not sure
c'mon - he is STILL NOT SURE!!
Posted on 7/30/25 at 11:56 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:That's one hell of a stretch
Aiding and abetting?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 11:58 am to PaperTiger
quote:
Inciting a riot? That could be a felony with the amount of damage incurred
As a huge fan of the 2nd Amendment, I sure as hell hope we don't start defining "providing PPE" as "Inciting a riot".
Sure. The guy is clearly on their side. But, at the end of the day, the PPE wasn't illegal to sell or own and good luck actually proving to a legal standard that he INTENDS the people who get the masks to riot vs simply proving them with a defense mechanism should they be attacked.
I can fully dislike the guy and what he stands for while simultaneously saying, "meh, good luck calling that shite a crime"
Posted on 7/30/25 at 12:09 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Take a look at this anti-riot law and let me know where you stand on this guy. I mean either we are for laws or against them. We cant pick and choose which ones to follow without consequence.
18 U.S. Code § 2101
18 U.S. Code § 2101
Posted on 7/30/25 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SFPanican
I only clicked on this thread because I knew your stupid arse would be in it. Meanwhile, even a Schmuck like Bill Maher is saying he was wrong and giving Trump credit on tariffs and the economy.
PS - I dare you to acknowledge what's happened with the stock market since they signed the EU deal. But you won't, since you run and hide every time you're proven wrong.
You've become a laughing stock.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 12:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
Is there any particular reason you need this sort of validation?
Does it make you feel superior? Do you need it to make yourself feel worthy? Or do you simply enjoy coming across as an arrogant SOB at times? Or is it "all in good fun"?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 12:13 pm to cardswinagain
Cowards
Repubs are useless
Repubs are useless
Posted on 7/30/25 at 12:22 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:Would providing them with bats be a crime? What about that chest armor some of them wear? At what point in time did he start supplying them, before or after the violent incidents related to the "protests" occurred?
But, at the end of the day, the PPE wasn't illegal to sell or own and good luck actually proving to a legal standard that he INTENDS the people who get the masks to riot vs simply proving them with a defense mechanism should they be attacked
Posted on 7/30/25 at 1:03 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
That's one hell of a stretch
quote:
Aiding and abetting, in legal terms, refers to assisting or encouraging another person to commit a crime.
Handing out face shields could assist and encourage others to commit federal crimes, such as assaulting ice officers. Not a stretch.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 2:55 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Handing out face shields could assist and encourage others to commit federal crimes, such as assaulting ice officers. Not a stretch.
LOL. Mmkay. Then, selling guns does the same x about 1000. Don't you see how dangerous of a road you're wanting to go down for expediency and how it could flat bite you in the arse later?
Posted on 7/30/25 at 2:56 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
Take a look at this anti-riot law and let me know where you stand on this guy. I mean either we are for laws or against them. We cant pick and choose which ones to follow without consequence.
18 U.S. Code § 2101
I've read it.
The problem you have is proving intent. And, you'd NEVER be able to short of him stupidly admitting it.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:00 pm to Jake88
quote:
Would providing them with bats be a crime? What about that chest armor some of them wear? At what point in time did he start supplying them, before or after the violent incidents related to the "protests" occurred?
Here's the problem. Even a bat CAN be a defensive tool. Same for chest armor.
I mean shite, these assholes just tried to put Kyle Rittenhouse in jail basically arguing that the mere fact he showed up with armor and a weapon proved he WANTED to shoot people. We correctly laughed their arse out of the room.
What if Kyle had brought 10 other vests and 10 other weapons and GIVEN them to people in a legal fashion?
If I'm this a-hole in the OP, I simply say, "I feared they might be harmed in the crossfire between ACTUAL rioters and the police".............which, um........DOES happen.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:11 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
LOL. Mmkay. Then, selling guns does the same x about 1000. Don't you see how dangerous of a road you're wanting to go down for expediency and how it could flat bite you in the arse later?
Holy fricking straw man, Batman.
First of all, if you are handing out guns knowing they will be used in a crime, absolutely you’re going to jail. How dumb can you be? This guy wasn’t selling face shields to random people, he was handing them out for the sole purpose that they were going to be used in a riot. Of course some liberal shithead like you are going to side with pieces of shite like this. Get your head out of your arse.
This post was edited on 7/30/25 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:44 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
knowing they will be used in a crime
This is my point. You would have to prove I knew. And that's the problem they have with this guy. He can claim he was just giving them stuff to protect themselves. And how exactly are you going to prove otherwise?
quote:lol. Man. I hate these frickers. I hate the guy who did this. I'm about as liberal as genghis Kahn
Of course some liberal shithead like you are going to side with pieces of shite like this
Posted on 7/30/25 at 3:46 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
I mean........ what exactly would the charges even be??
Likely, obstruction of justice.
Posted on 7/30/25 at 4:30 pm to Tigergreg
quote:
Likely, obstruction of justice.
Lol
Wut?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News