re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security

quote:

---

Only those, like yourself, that want to see him defeated, think he will ignore the courts.

---

you can dig through this thread and others and find lots of maga who think the courts are corrupt and want Trump to defy the courts orders. That isn't some dem thing....

quote:

---

criminal illegal aliens dont have the constitutional rights of a citizen. Also, judicial overreach is the opposite of small government.

---

please read the 14th amendment slowly and carefully. All persons have the right to due process of the law

quote:

---

please read the 14th amendment slowly and carefully. All persons have the right to due process of the law

---

citizens

Nobody involved in writing the 14th amendment ever thought the US would be run by people stupid enough to open the border wide for everybody else's human debris.

They should also notate in the responses.

“we feel it is a conflict of interest to share national security issues with terrorist that your daughter helps avoid the law”

Blah blah blah

And see if he backs down once it’s on public record and court filings

quote:

---

but again this act allows the president to round up anyone of Venezuelan origin and deport them too

---

Did they enter OUR country illegally? You reap what you sow. Break the law, suffer the consequences.

quote:

---

Nobody is arguing they shouldn't have been deported.

---

bullshite! The district judge ORDERED AN INFLIGHT PLANE TO BE TURNED AROUND! You and your ilk have been defending this shithead judge for more than 10 pages of posts! Don't piss on my leg, and tell me it's raining. Everyone here has saw thru your shite for years. You are website infamous for being a Dem shill, defending every illogical position that YOUR party endorses, regardless of how insane it is to the average person. Sell your crazy somewhere else.

Taibbi's site has been doing good timelines on some of these recent issues. It's sort of a good re-set after all of the arguing on here.

quote:

---

Until last week, “war” was the common denominator in describing the three events for which presidents invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.

The War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. You get the idea. No one disputed those were wars.

That’s not the case with President Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act — officially called “An Act Respecting Alien Enemies” when it passed 227 years ago.

The Trump Administration has to make the case that its war on the Tren de Aragua gang is a real war rather than a campaign like, say, the war on drugs in the 1980s.

The last time the Alien Enemies Act was put into use was after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt issued a proclamation on Dec. 7, 1941, aimed at non-citizen immigrants from Japan. Similar proclamations were issued the following day that targeted German and Italian immigrants. FDR then went a huge step further three months later with a superseding executive order to put these groups in internment camps, with people of Japanese ancestry primarily affected.

Here’s a timeline of events, disputes, and records related to the fourth invocation of the Alien Enemies Act eight decades later:

---

LINK

No.
The AEA allows the President to capture the people designated by the President in a specific Proclamation. The current Proclamation does not allow for capture of all Venezuelans. Have you read it? If you would read it, you should know who is subject to government action.

quote:

---

Not if they are here legally, and abiding immigration law.

---

Unless Little Marco says they’re not.