- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does this align with being pro-life? Louisiana refuses summer meal assistance for kids
Posted on 1/16/24 at 7:47 am to wackatimesthree
Posted on 1/16/24 at 7:47 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
I get so tired of this lazy "Uniparty" nonsense.
You’re naive. There may not be a uniparty but every single presidential candidate would gleefully watch you burn alive if it meant a “campaign” donation. If you refuse to acknowledge this then you are simply a lemming.
quote:
So no, to you and every other "Uniparty nutter" on here, the outcome is objectively NOT the same regardless of who wins.
Keep living for your tribe. Send them your money and cuss out members of the other tribe. That’ll show ‘em.
Meanwhile nothing gets better.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 7:52 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Keep living for your tribe. Send them your money and cuss out members of the other tribe. That’ll show ‘em.
Meanwhile nothing gets better.
I can't tell if you're really this stupid or you just like 30 page troll topics and will say whatever's needed to keep them going.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 8:42 am to Flats
quote:
can't tell if you're really this stupid or you just like 30 page troll topics and will say whatever's needed to keep them going.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 8:44 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Does this align with being pro-life? Louisiana refuses summer meal assistance for kids
The 2 issues are mutually exclusive
Posted on 1/16/24 at 9:32 am to 4cubbies
When did we start assuming that kids only get to eat a school? And if so, what systems perpetuated this reality? Why would we do more of the same? For low income we gift them: medical care, dental care, money for food, and housing. Every outcome measure tells us they have worse nutrition, decreasing dental and medical health, and worse living conditions.
Why would a loving person continue to follow this model?
Why would a loving person continue to follow this model?
Posted on 1/16/24 at 9:39 am to tigerfoot
"The most important thing for a leftist is denying the perfectly obvious in order to embrace the perfectly ridiculous, then being sanctimonious about it, as if imbecility was some higher form of morality."
Don't know the author of the quote. Captures the OP and this thread perfectly, though.
Don't know the author of the quote. Captures the OP and this thread perfectly, though.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 9:55 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Wait, you mean to tell me you’re a man whose never been wrong?
1. I never said anything about being right or wrong. I said I have acknowledged every post you've ever made that I have seen that I thought was correct. Which to date, totals one.
2. I also never said anything about men and women. You're a woman. I've never seen you admit you were wrong on this board (despite having people demonstrate in various ways how you have been wrong).
But I guess that doesn't say anything about all WOMEN not being willing to admit being wrong, does it?
I'm very well acquainted with That's Different©.
This post was edited on 1/16/24 at 10:18 am
Posted on 1/16/24 at 10:10 am to 4cubbies
quote:
You’re naive. There may not be a uniparty but every single presidential candidate would gleefully watch you burn alive if it meant a “campaign” donation.
So what?
The results and the effect on my life and your life and those black people's and women's lives are objectively, demonstrably different depending upon who gets elected.
That's like saying that Mother Theresa and Ted Bundy are the same because they both breathed oxygen and ate food.
Let me explain something to you. "Politician" means someone who makes public policy, which means—to some significant degree, at least—those people are controlling our lives.
Politicians further agendas, and those agendas are very different depending upon which politicians we're talking about. Some politician's agendas reflect my values much better than others, and some politicians attempt to further values that are diametrically opposed to my values (either in original intent, or with regard to unintended consequences).
I don't care what special interest group bribed them to vote a certain way, I care about the results of their votes and what effect it's going to have on my life and those I care about.
That's how most mature adults operate with regard to politics IME.
quote:
Keep living for your tribe.
LOL. Who is "my tribe?" I'll bet you money you can't describe what my values are and who I would ideally want to be POTUS.
But hey, I'm talking to someone who is currently leaning really hard into virtue signaling on the basis of being "above" politics.
On an internet chat board.
Exclusively devoted to the topic of...politics.
So...
This post was edited on 1/16/24 at 10:19 am
Posted on 1/16/24 at 10:57 am to 4cubbies
quote:You may have misread or misunderstood. My only comment in that vein related to Dahmer.
it seems like you’re saying it depends on who was murdered
Posted on 1/16/24 at 11:23 am to 4cubbies
My tax dollars shouldn't be going to feed Shaniqua's 9 kids by 8 different dads because she couldn't keep her legs closed.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 11:25 am to 4cubbies
quote:
you’re really committed to your t(R)ibe.
Because you contradict yourself multiple times in any given topic? Do tell how that reasoning works.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 11:28 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
But hey, I'm talking to someone who is currently leaning really hard into virtue signaling on the basis of being "above" politics. On an internet chat board. Exclusively devoted to the topic of...politics.
Who started a topic complaining that something political isn't happening that she thinks should happen and the tribe that isn't letting it happen doesn't have good values.
It's weird as hell.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 2:15 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You may have misread or misunderstood. My only comment in that vein related to Dahmer.
So is your assumption that humans do posses inherent worth (dignity) until they behave horrifically?
Posted on 1/16/24 at 2:27 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
ike your tribe has really been looking out for you and your family.
One tribe (yours, Democrat) is actively grooming, abusing an sexualzing children.
One tribe (yours") does know what the fk "woman" means.
The other tribe isn't perfect, but at least they aren't fascist, insane pedophiles.
Posted on 1/16/24 at 2:52 pm to 4cubbies
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/2/24 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 1/16/24 at 4:23 pm to 4cubbies
quote:100%
So is your assumption that humans do posses inherent worth (dignity) until they behave horrifically?
... and I'd like to believe ... God's as well ... regardless of religious expression
Posted on 1/23/24 at 5:41 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:quote:100% ... and I'd like to believe ... God's as well ... regardless of religious expression
So is your assumption that humans do posses inherent worth (dignity) until they behave horrifically?
Hey NC, I heard something yesterday that made me think of your post. When Jesus was being tortured and murdered on the cross, He asked the Father to forgive the people torturing Him. We are all God’s beloved children. His love knows no limitations.
I also tried to consider if my beloved child did something horrific, would I stop seeing value in my child’s life? I don’t think I could.
Just some food for thought.
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 1/23/24 at 5:57 pm to 4cubbies
quote:Why?
He asked the Father to forgive the people torturing Him.
Because, in that instance he pled, "they know not what they do."
If we are all God’s beloved children, and His love knows no limitations, why did Jesus feel need for the disclaimer?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 6:03 pm to 4cubbies
Feed your own kids OP. I'm responsible for mine and no one else's. Grow up already
Posted on 1/23/24 at 6:36 pm to Pelican fan99
quote:
Parents should feed their own kids its not the job of the government. What does that have to do with pro life?
Of course, but hypothetically, if a child’s parents are unable or unwilling to feed them, should the child starve?
I think using these kinds of things as “gotchas” to the pro life movement are cynical politics, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a larger discussion to be had about whether we are a culture of death or a culture of life
Popular
Back to top


2






