- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Does MSNBC Historian Michael Beschloss Have The Best Melty Reaction To Overturn Of Roe?
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:10 pm
“This decision was intended to throw scalding acid into the face of people who believe in abortion rights. It was intended to shock.”
Not counting Keith Olbermann, of course?
Not counting Keith Olbermann, of course?
12
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:12 pm to LuckyTiger
Childish reaction. He should be ashamed of himself and question whatever education that his parents overpaid for.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:13 pm to LuckyTiger
Was it really like acid to the face? I think it was more of a red hot poker up the arse.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:14 pm to LuckyTiger
It was meant to suck the life right out of them. But they still aren't happy, for some reason.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:16 pm to LuckyTiger
Hyperbolic.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:19 pm to LuckyTiger
Abortion is not outlawed. Oh the hyperventilating!
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:20 pm to LuckyTiger
That is how they really feel, because they are racked with guilt. They have no God to ask for forgiveness (or they've rejected Him.) Justification, right or wrong, came from the law. Government as God. And now they feel judged for what they did. They thought they would escape it forever.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:22 pm to Gaggle
No, most of these people are somehow devoid of souls, or at the very least, a conscience. That doesn't bother them at all.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 1:22 pm to LuckyTiger
How does a historian not grasp the fact that the Supreme Court and the Constitution are completely independent of, and in fact were designed to counterbalance, “the majority of Americans”?
Why even mention the majority with respect to this decision unless it’s to congratulate the Founding Fathers on their design?
Why even mention the majority with respect to this decision unless it’s to congratulate the Founding Fathers on their design?
Posted on 6/30/22 at 2:01 pm to LuckyTiger
I wonder if anyone has spoken to a sky screaming abortionist, and asked them if they AT LEAST understand the Rights side of all this. How it supports The Constitutions States Rights amendment, separate of the religious moral piece of it. I'm sure they will be the first to push the "separation of church and state" farse in The Constitution, but I wonder if they can at the least come to agreement on this part. (i know i know...just wondering)
At the end of the day it's their fault for believing the almost 50yo grift that abortions are Constitutional.
At the end of the day it's their fault for believing the almost 50yo grift that abortions are Constitutional.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 2:02 pm to LuckyTiger
Well, then maybe he knows how a baby feels when they inject it with saltwater or pull it apart when it's too big for the body to dissolve. Touche'
Posted on 6/30/22 at 3:37 pm to LuckyTiger
He has us confused with Jehadists.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 3:39 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
decision was intended to throw scalding acid into the face of people who believe in abortion rights.
Too bad it didnt
Wish it did
Posted on 6/30/22 at 4:02 pm to LuckyTiger
If it's the will of a majority of people... There is a way to make the constitution read " you have the right to kill babies" ... They just have to follow the steps
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News