- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you support the release of the Dem memo?
Posted on 2/3/18 at 4:59 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 2/3/18 at 4:59 am to boosiebadazz
Yes and frick yes
0
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:02 am to boosiebadazz
maybe
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:08 am to boosiebadazz
I’ve tried to give you the benefit of the doubt over and over. But you would do anything to save the arse of the first AA POTUS. You are a sad sack of fricking shite.
But you probably know it...
But you probably know it...
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:40 am to boosiebadazz
Yes, yes
Transparency
Transparency
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:42 am to boosiebadazz
Knee jerk is yes. Let them release it.
The only reason not to is if the Dems poison pill out.
The only reason not to is if the Dems poison pill out.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:44 am to boosiebadazz
Oh. And yes you underlying documents.
Again, with the caveat that they may not ALL be releasable
But in principle, yes
Again, with the caveat that they may not ALL be releasable
But in principle, yes
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:44 am to boosiebadazz
Yes to both
Posted on 2/3/18 at 5:58 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
A simple yes or no to both will suffice.
Why give a simple yes when one can prevaricate?
Provisionally yes, though if there are truly "top secret" levels of classification involved then there may be sources at risk (e.g. see Glenn Simpson's testimony about his belief that Steele Dossier source may have been killed after the publication). If steps can be able to protect sources, I'd support.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:04 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Why give a simple yes when one can prevaricate?
Well. I want it ALL out.
But you can't act like you have never witnessed politics before either.
I say pretty much 100% to the Dem memo. I can imagine a tiny fraction not to, but release it
The underlying are harder because i assume some of that really DOES have highly secret shite in it. Even then. I want them released. I just assume there will be redactions.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:05 am to boosiebadazz
quote:100%
Do you support the release of the Dem memo?
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:06 am to ShortyRob
Dude, his mom and dad were all about Muh Watergate.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:07 am to Errerrerrwere
My aunt too. Did I tell you she used to work for Archie Cox?
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:07 am to boosiebadazz
Sure, why not? Let's give our opponents greater insight into sources and methods. Fun and games.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:07 am to TigerDoc
Don’t remember. Has she started shaving her armpits?
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:09 am to boosiebadazz
yes and yes 
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:12 am to Mulat
Not sure. Knowing the situation, I bet it is a steaming pile of lies. It needs to be verified by the committee. If the committee deems it trash, then sorry, no, I don't support it being released. Those are the rules of the game.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:14 am to Errerrerrwere
Cheer up, fellow. I'm sure Sundance will be along shortly to soothe you with some new allegations.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:18 am to BigAppleBucky
quote:
Let's give our opponents greater insight into sources and methods.
what "Sources and methods" were exposed yesterday?
the only source was Steele, which (a) wasn't exposed yesterday and (b) wasn't a government source (he was privately funded)
the only method exposed was that our federal LEO is OK with using a document funded and created by the political opponents of its target as alleged evidence to get a warrant against that opponent. why, exactly, do you feel this type of terrible (and possibly illegal) behavior should not be exposed?
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:49 am to boosiebadazz
You mean the minority vote rebuttal?
I am sure they have cooperating evidence.
I am sure they have cooperating evidence.
This post was edited on 2/3/18 at 6:51 am
Posted on 2/3/18 at 6:54 am to boosiebadazz
Yes and yes, let's get transparency...
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News