- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you believe that the United States was founded as a Christian Nation?
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:20 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:20 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Need I go on?
Naw, just keep reading until you see me say this...
quote:
The fact that the Christian founders of this country were mature enough to self-impose structure that would assure that ALL religions could be practiced freely is probably the most astounding man-made achievement in the history of civilization.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:21 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
And it certainly was never intended to prevent children from praying in school or having a copy of the 10 commandments in a court room. It was never intended to be what progressives have warped it into today.
Perhaps it wasn't, but when you form a country and open your arms to all-comers, you're going to end up with very diverse religious beliefs at some point. And when that happens, and a governmental unit or building is perceived to adopt one religion by use of religious symbols or prayers, there is going to be backlash and there is going to be requests for the article to be interpreted.
Short-sightedness by the Founders? Perhaps. But that's where we are.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:21 pm to REG861
quote:
Oh, so they WANTED state-sponsored religion then? Damn, you'd think they would have clarified that in the very first one of the bill of rights, but they chose not to. In fact, they stated the exact opposite of that.
Nuance always escapes those who pretend to possess it.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:22 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
[He] sais “neither Pagan nor Mahamedan [Muslim] nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the Commonwealth because of his religion.” — Thomas Jefferson, quoting John Locke, 1776
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
Do you find it the least bit troublesome that the people who actually wrote those words don't interpret them in any way close to the way in which you do?
Has any document/book ever written been interpreted as originally written or has any document/book been interpreted the same over time? Consider the bible.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:23 pm to cwill
The Constitution is [supposed to be] the framework of our country. It's not just a document/book.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:29 pm to The Spleen
quote:That would imply this country was founded on christian principles.......and I don't think the founding fathers ever expected this country to have such a large Muslim segment or even a large segment of atheist.
ut when you form a country and open your arms to all-comers, you're going to end up with very diverse religious beliefs at some point. And when that happens, and a governmental unit or building is perceived to adopt one religion by use of religious symbols or prayers, there is going to be backlash and there is going to be requests for the article to be interpreted.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:33 pm to ballscaster
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/18/23 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:35 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Benjamin Franklin
SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION; DIPLOMAT; PRINTER; SCIENTIST; SIGNER OF THE CONSTITUTION; GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA
As to Jesus of Nazareth, my opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of morals and His religion as He left them to us, the best the world ever saw or is likely to see.29
The body of Benjamin Franklin, printer, like the cover of an old book, its contents torn out and stripped of its lettering and guilding, lies here, food for worms. Yet the work itself shall not be lost; for it will, as he believed, appear once more in a new and more beatiful edition, corrected and amended by the Author.30(FRANKLIN’S EULOGY THAT HE WROTE FOR HIMSELF)
Franklin isn't a Deist because he... praised the teachings of Jesus? Because he believed in an unspecified afterlife? And these are inconsistent with Deism because...?
I suppose there's no way to really know the truth. I mean it's not like the guy published an outrageously famous autobiography in which he literally said he was a Deist.
quote:I'm sure the rest of CHRISTIAN_FOUNDING_FATHERS.TXT is of similar rigor.
I was scarce 15 when, after doubting by turns of several Points as I found them disputed in the different Books I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself. Some Books against Deism fell into my Hands; they were said to be the Substance of Sermons preached at Boyle's Lectures. It happened that they wrought an Effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them: For the Arguments of the Deists which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much Stronger than the Refutations. In short I soon became a thorough Deist.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 1:39 pm to Iosh
quote:Did anyone say that?
Franklin isn't a Deist
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:05 pm to genro
quote:
The Constitution is [supposed to be] the framework of our country. It's not just a document/book.
But it is despite your interpretation of how it should be treated. Is the bible just a book to Christians? Why has it Christianity changed so much over time?
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:10 pm to cwill
quote:Christianity/Islam/Any Religion can be just about anything. This is the way it's been throughout history. One can read it and choose to live a life of poverty and charity. One can read it and choose to live a life of violence and oppression. I happen to think some religions are inherently more conducive to violence than others, but that's beside the point.
Is the bible just a book to Christians?
quote:Are you really saying that law should be open to as much interpretation as religions currently are? You are comparing contemporary national law to ancient worldwide religious text. What on earth? Under this ideal, any law can mean literally anything.
Why has it Christianity changed so much over time?
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:20 pm to mouton
Nope.
The founding fathers did and amazing job in crafting the framework of the nation. If they had wanted Jesus in there, they would have put him in there.
The founding fathers did and amazing job in crafting the framework of the nation. If they had wanted Jesus in there, they would have put him in there.
This post was edited on 9/16/14 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 9/16/14 at 2:51 pm to cwill
quote:
Has any document/book ever written been interpreted as originally written or has any document/book been interpreted the same over time? Consider the bible.
Sure it changes. But then we have to stop pretending that's the way it was meant to be and admit it's the way some people want it to be. And that cedes the moral high ground the separation of church and state evangelists think they occupy.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 3:03 pm to stormy
quote:
In God we trust
Adopted as the official motto in 1956.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 3:05 pm to genro
Law and it's interpretation reflect the culture. Over time as the culture changes so does the law. It's just a fact of life.
Posted on 9/16/14 at 3:08 pm to mouton
quote:
Was having an interesting conversation about this with someone on Facebook. I tried to explain to her that most of the founding fathers were Deists and not Christians. She obviously did not believe me even after I provided quotes from several of the founding fathers. What are your thoughts on this?
Even if every last one of the founding fathers was a devout Christian it would still not mean that it was founded as a Christian nation. The faith of the founding fathers was irrelevant to them as the country was founded on freedom of religion. If the intent was for the country to be founded as a Christian nation then freedom of religion wouldn't have been allowed.
/thread
Posted on 9/16/14 at 3:09 pm to cwill
quote:
Law and it's interpretation reflect the culture. Over time as the culture changes so does the law. It's just a fact of life.
But the justification for the change isn't "stuff changes." Is it?
Posted on 9/16/14 at 3:12 pm to cwill
quote:I agree completely. It should be that way. But it's not that way. Does the culture want all religious artifacts removed? Does the culture want gay marriage? Does the culture want a giant welfare class? Does the culture want the PATRIOT Act?
Law and it's interpretation reflect the culture. Over time as the culture changes so does the law. It's just a fact of life.
Tons of things in our country exist because certain people imposed law on an unwilling culture.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News