- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents regarding Russia hoax
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:30 pm to trinidadtiger
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:30 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
quote:
Mueller proved no less than 10 different ways that Russia interfered in 2016.
From the American Bar Association.....
quote:
Mar 25, 2019 — Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump's campaign coordinated with Russia.
Two different things here... they didn't have to “coordinate” to “interfere”
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:31 pm to cajunangelle
CNN had a small write up buried on their website. Again, didn't mention what the contents of the release entailed. Only a statement from Mark Warner.
Still nothing to be found on legacy media websites.
Them not covering this is an, 'over the target' sign.
Still nothing to be found on legacy media websites.
Them not covering this is an, 'over the target' sign.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:34 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
one of these is not like the other
That’s because you can’t read.
Russian interference is not the same as collusion.
Trump was not charged with collusion = true
Russian interference was proven = true
Arrests and convictions were made = true
People in the campaign knew & welcomed the interference = true
No evidence was found that Trump himself knew = true
It’s easy as shite to find the Mueller report or a summary. Have you read anything about this story other than the headline? Be honest.
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:51 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
quote:
When you constantly parrot the talking point that “Russia hacked the election”, it’s the same as saying they hacked vote totals because you’re intentionally trying to leave the impression that votes were changed.
---------
Watching trump supporters make interpretive Democrat statements into something nefarious while ignoring the shite trump spews or defending it with spin is one of the most amazing phenomenons.
it is amazing
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:54 pm to Mushroom1968
This just confirms what we all knew to believe. We were right. Once again.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:55 pm to AuburnTigers
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. LINK
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 7/19/25 at 2:57 pm to Bunk Moreland
What are the cliffs on this?
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:10 pm to HeadCall
quote:
What are the cliffs on this?
Some tweets & a nothingburger.
Red meat.
NYT April 21, 2020 (Gifted Article): Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference
American Bar Associations Summary of Mueller Report
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:12 pm to DeathByTossDive225
You honestly believe this? This has been proven to be a hoax, they spent 10s of millions to try and prove their lie and could not do it. Yet you still wanna believe, I really feel for people so engrossed in the propaganda that you cant think for yourself.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:13 pm to HeadCall
quote:
What are the cliffs on this?
Nothing new. It’s the same old Charlie Brown Football ordeal. They never learn.
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:18 pm to trinidadtiger
NYT April 21, 2020 (Gifted Article): Republican-Led Review Backs Intelligence Findings on Russian Interference
What’s there to not believe.
Are you living in an alternate reality where people weren’t arrested for interference or where Trump was charged with collusion?
What’s there to not believe.
Are you living in an alternate reality where people weren’t arrested for interference or where Trump was charged with collusion?
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:25 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:48 pm to cajunangelle
Oh no , not black Jesus . He told us he ran the most transparent and corrupt free administration in history.
Imagine being so ignorant to believe that.
Imagine being so ignorant to believe that.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:51 pm to Bunk Moreland
Ben Rhodes was in the Obama situ room meeting. He said he found out about Trump being under FBI/DOJ investigation-in the news. Such a slime.
Ben Rhodes failed his backround clearance. Obama had to push him through with a waiver. All so he could conduct the Iran Deal in a world of ineptitude.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Ben Rhodes failed his backround clearance. Obama had to push him through with a waiver. All so he could conduct the Iran Deal in a world of ineptitude.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 3:55 pm to Septiger
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 7/19/25 at 4:11 pm to Septiger
Posted on 7/19/25 at 4:14 pm to Mushroom1968
Basically we who read the Conservative Treehouse knew all this years ago, read hos post today and look at the LINKS in the post that show he figured all this out in 2017-18-19.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 7/19/25 at 4:15 pm to Mushroom1968
This will be a nothing burger. Has already been investigated years ago.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 4:18 pm to LightHeat
quote:
The Fox article from which this OP's tweet is sourced LINK is not as wild as the headline, as usual.
The original Russia investigation was about "interference", like making up fake Facebook and Twitter accounts and posting fake news. But the Fox article makes it seem like the Russia investigation was about hacking voting machines. The reporter says there are newly declassified documents saying the Intelligence Community under Obama assessed that Russia did not hack voting machines, but was engaged in psychological operations.
So the article seems to be implying that the "treasonous plot" was going forward with the Russia investigation knowing that Russia had not successfully hacked voting machines, when that was never what the investigation was about. Special Counsel Mueller was tasked with investigating Russian interference broadly speaking, and found that Russia had interfered. See Report.
Thank you! You're one of the few people on this site that actually read and understood the reports. There's nothing we didn't already know here.
Popular
Back to top


0





