Started By
Message
locked post

DNI to Schiff: The transcripts are ready to release

Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:28 am
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59636 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:28 am
quote:

EXCLUSIVE -- DNI TO SCHIFF: THE TRANSCRIPTS ARE READY TO RELEASE. A big development in the fight over 53 secret interviews the House Intelligence Committee conducted during its Trump-Russia investigation. Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has sent a letter to chairman Adam Schiff notifying him that transcripts of all 53 interviews, over 6,000 pages in all, have been cleared for public release. "All of the transcripts, with our required redactions, can be released to the public without any concerns of disclosing classified material," Grenell wrote to Schiff in a letter dated May 4.

The Intel Committee did the first probe into Russia's 2016 campaign interference and allegations of Trump-Russia collusion. Even today, its findings make up most of what we know about the affair. As part of that investigation -- it was run by then-majority Republicans -- the committee interviewed some key witnesses in the Trump-Russia matter: Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Michael Cohen, Hope Hicks, and many more.




Given the timing of the reveal to the American people just how crooked the Obama DOJ was, and how they railroaded Gen. Flynn, the timing of this news as Schiff continues to stonewall his cover for the fake whistleblower and CIA asset Eric Ciaramella couldn't be more delicious.

ETA: Forgot the sauce https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-yorks-daily-memo-exclusive-dni-to-schiff-the-transcripts-are-ready-to-release
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 10:51 am
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26615 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:31 am to
By law, he has to release them now, doesn't he?
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:32 am to
Would love to have seen his face when he received this news.

Confirm Ratcliffe and keep this train rolling!
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:35 am to
Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.

Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
8607 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:36 am to
"dint do nuffin" No one goes to jail as usual
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98828 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.


Democracy dies in darkness.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98828 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:37 am to
quote:

"dint do schiff"


works better in this instance I think
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22090 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.

Party of transparency.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101322 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:41 am to
quote:

quote:
Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.


Democracy dies in darkness.


It gives TOKEN such a boner, though, knowing his government can keep so much shite like this hidden from us foolish plebes.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.



Why wouldn't he?

He has SEEN THE EVIDENCE?

wish I had a dollar for every time he said that
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
7560 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.



Why would he not release them? I thought he had proof of collusion? He doesn't want to show the American people the proof?
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16717 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.


If the DNI has made classified redactions, pretty sure they can be “leaked” without consequence. Right?
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
30904 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:47 am to
If Schitt does not release them, a Republican on the committee needs to do it. That is what the Democrats would do.

ETA: What are the ones he really wants to keep hidden, can't be all 53?
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 8:49 am
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:48 am to
quote:

It gives TOKEN such a boner, though, knowing his government can keep so much shite like this hidden from us foolish plebes.


I get no satisfaction in watching Schiff take a major dump on the poliboards newspaper this early in the morning.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 8:49 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98582 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.


I am not so sure about that. Since they are part of the proceedings of a public body, they would absolutely be subject to FOIA requests since they have been redacted and cleared for public release by the necessary agencies.

That said, even if not, an honest press would be howling for their release.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73338 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I get no satisfaction in watching Schiff take a major dump on the poliboards newspaper this early in the morning.


Sounds more like you are very satisfied.

Imagine being on team pencil neck yikes
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80107 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:50 am to
Are these the documents that allegedly show of his office working with the whistleblower to bring down Trump?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32214 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Schiff legally doesn’t have to release them.

Proper FOIA request then I bet he does
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98828 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I get no satisfaction in watching Schiff take a major dump on the poliboards newspaper this early in the morning.


How about when he shits on the Constitution?
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Why would he not release them? I thought he had proof of collusion? He doesn't want to show the American people the proof?


American people are probably past Russia and its probably best we move forward at this point. If the “R”s win back House then I bet we get further investigations.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 8:55 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram