- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJT - Tomorrow's Supreme Court case is "literally, LIFE OR DEATH for our Country..."
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:51 am to 3down10
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:51 am to 3down10
quote:
Gosh, I wonder how we ever made it over 200 years without doing this.
Was globalism a thing the past 200 years?
No. The game has changed the past couple of decades and we haven’t kept up.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 7:55 am
2
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:52 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Congress is hopelessly divided and incapable of holding America together.
Your black pill is noted.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:53 am to BobBoucher
quote:
Was globalism a thing the past 200 years?
"Globalism" has a malleable definition, but in many of them, yes.
You think international relations and purported conspiratorial groups just started? Just look at the big CT references like the Illuminati and Rothschilds. Those things didn't start up just recently, per the CTs.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:55 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Maybe the courts can save Trump from himself this time.
That was exactly my thought.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The question is how much excess executive authority the USSC will give him. Biden got 0 and that was a huge victory for all of us. Reversing that means the next Biden can do extreme silliness like loan forgiveness out of irrelevant statutes.
Dude, they don't care about what the next Democratic POTUS could do with these expanded powers that Trump keeps pushing the envelope on.
They are populists.
Which means that they refuse to think even one step ahead and you're asking them to think 3-4 steps ahead.
Populism is the most immature political ideology possible and this is the reason why. Delayed gratification and impulse control is actually vilified in populism.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You think international relations and purported conspiratorial groups just started? Just look at the big CT references like the Illuminati and Rothschilds. Those things didn't start up just recently, per the CTs.
I’ll grant you it’s always existed to a degree, but not in current scope and scale.
Now you have the EU, WTO, and UN all bought in pushing it. Not some isolated group most people never heard of.
And that’s happened just within the past decade or so. That’s the change we need to adjust to.
And Congress can’t even get off their arse to fund the government.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:05 am to Bunk Moreland
A lot of constitutional conservatives are gonna be in here arguing against explicit constitutional provisions 
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:07 am to BobBoucher
quote:
I’ll grant you it’s always existed to a degree, but not in current scope and scale.
Again, it depends on how you define "globalism"
Go research the Bronze Age Collapse. A major reason for that was "globalism" failing. Even back in the 12th century BCE, you had international trade among various city-states over a WIDE area
Those trade agreements, routes, etc. are the same as what's called "globalism" today (with things like the WTO, EU, etc.)
quote:
Now you have the EU, WTO,
As your'e well aware
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you think he needs this, you need Congress to pass legislation granting him this specific tariff power
You are then predicting a slap down right?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The President only has the power Congress gives him.
Executive orders are used by all presidents without Congress approval, but they are limited.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:11 am to Tigergreg
quote:
Executive orders are used by all presidents without Congress approval,
Which EOs are you citing that don't derive power from a Congressional statute?
As I've shown, ITT, the Trump admin is arguing these tariffs are derived from statutory sources.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:12 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
You are then predicting a slap down right?
I'm not sure. I summarized it earlier
quote:
The question is how much excess executive authority the USSC will give him. Biden got 0 and that was a huge victory for all of us. Reversing that means the next Biden can do extreme silliness like loan forgiveness out of irrelevant statutes.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
I thought the US Constitution clearly instructs the POTUS regarding his "power"?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your black pill is noted.
My observation is very much present tense.
No one (including me) knows what that future might bring.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:25 am to Bunk Moreland
Yeah, Trump needs to win this. Congress would never do any of this and couldn't do it the way Trump has.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for the history lesson, but it tells me you’re missing my point: it’s changed drastically.
Those global organizations exist to tear down US supremacy. The US has to adjust and Congress can’t.
Those global organizations exist to tear down US supremacy. The US has to adjust and Congress can’t.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:44 am to BobBoucher
quote:
Those global organizations exist to tear down US supremacy. The US has to adjust and Congress can’t.
So you disregard clear constitutional text?
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:47 am to BobBoucher
quote:
it’s changed drastically.
I keep saying you need to define it, and you keep dodging and just making claims about this term without meaning.
quote:
Those global organizations exist to tear down US supremacy.
No country has profited more from those orgs than the US
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 8:48 am
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:50 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
So you disregard clear constitutional text?
I don’t think that’s the answer. I’m pointing out the problem and that Congress isn’t the solution since they can’t even keep the light on.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:51 am to Timeoday
quote:
I thought the US Constitution clearly instructs the POTUS regarding his "power"?
Article 1, Section 10
quote:
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Control of the Congress.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News