Started By
Message

re: DJT - “I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up.”

Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
68527 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

President shouldn’t be trying to drive prices up just for the old


Why do you keep repeating this dumb line like baby boomers are the only ones with home equity? Like this is nearing dumbest post on this board territory.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11310 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

What's terrible about it? I bet you pay 8-10 bucks for a cup of coffee you could make at home for 20 cents.


How tf is that going to help a 23 year old fresh out of college buy a 1500sqft garden home for $260,000?
Posted by Jugbow
Member since Nov 2025
3592 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

How tf is that going to help a 23 year old fresh out of college buy a 1500sqft garden home for $260,000?


You sound like socialists. Figure it out smart one
Posted by PurpleCrush
ATL
Member since May 2014
2430 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:16 pm to
No gotcha, just more dumb talk not helping thehousing market with "afforability", a new word

The dollar dropping in value is a good thing according to him too
Posted by aubie101
Russia
Member since Nov 2010
4116 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Do you know how many people would be underwater on their loans at that point?


A ton

quote:
If you want to push the economy into a depression worse than 2008 your plan is perfect.

This is that weird situation where we all know what the problem is, but we pretend that the people who took the unnecessary risk should be rewarded at the expense of the people who waited for the more rational opportunity.

I used to use this during the Obamacare discussions, but it applies here too. Why do you want to punish the people who made the right decision?


I am a real estate investor and most of my homes would be fine. But the solution is not to depress the market, The fact is people need to make more money. Incomes need to rise, which is hard now with AI taking over. But the answer is not to tank the economy, that is suicidal.

There is a middle ground. Interest rates need to be much lower and refinance options have to be easier to obtain. We need to have targeted and more aggressive new homeowner programs that help first time owners. 50 year mortgages are lame, but they may be needed as an option. As an investor the answer is not kill the patient, but make tweaks and make it more robust.

Bankrupting the boomers (my parents) is not the answer.
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
2008 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:21 pm to
He also said this, right before he said what the OP chose to snip and quote in his title


Trump: "People that own their homes -- we're gonna keep them wealthy. We're gonna keep those prices up. We're not gonna destroy the value of their homes so that somebody who didn't work very hard can buy a home."

compare and contrast that to you standing up and saying "I hope there's a 25% decline in home prices but I'll take a 15% decline".

It speaks volumes about you, and how your future posts should be taken. For reasons not the least of which is you decided Trump got up and said only what's in the title as simplistically as you said what you did.

One of you is a moron. Well 2........ you and the dude who started this thread.
Posted by Arkaea79
Member since Sep 2022
1097 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:22 pm to
Interest rates need to go down, what part of this do you people STILL not get?
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40369 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Bankrupting the boomers (my parents) is not the answer.

Maybe they should have saved for retirement instead of buying 4000 sq ft houses
Posted by aubie101
Russia
Member since Nov 2010
4116 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Maybe they should have saved for retirement instead of buying 4000 sq ft houses



They have a 1900 square foot home. Try again
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
2008 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:30 pm to
the part where they think a 25% reduction in home prices is the only solution.

these are the same people who cheered Powell's position about tariffs causing inflation.

And that Biden had no hand in causing the inflation of his term.

Take them for what they are worth (which ain't much)

they really thought they had a winning sound bit here in the title so.......
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13263 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

How tf is that going to help a 23 year old fresh out of college buy a 1500sqft garden home for $260,000?

You don't.

How many fresh out of college 23 year olds owned a home ever? The average age of first time home buyers...35 YEARS AGO...was 28.

Come out of college with a good paying job or wait and save like the rest of the country...like always.

Here's a thought...buy a fixer upper. Learn how and do a lot of the work yourself. Triple your homes value at the same time.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13263 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Maybe they should have saved for retirement instead of buying 4000 sq ft houses

The largest transfer of wealth, ever, will come from the boomer generation.

But hey, none of them saved a thing.

Posted by AllbyMyRelf
Virginia
Member since Nov 2014
4199 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

I mean technically that is correct. If all else stays equal. The true value of our homes isn't what's changing. The value of the dollar is what's changing. If all other factors stay the same, inflation may happen, but incomes and other assets inflate the same. It's when we drive up home cost due to cheap money, then do a 180 and have high rates, then we see people getting screwed (aka the last several years).
Except for the fact that even if rates stay low, most wages haven’t kept pace with housing, renters and new buyers are left behind, and cheap money inflates prices beyond sustainable values—any (inevitable) later rate rise exacerbates these effects.
Posted by NytroBud
LaFayette
Member since Jun 2009
6080 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:41 pm to
What he needs to do next is kill the property tax.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
158004 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:43 pm to
Yeah. The federal property tax must be abolished.
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
2008 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:46 pm to
"How tf is that going to help a 23 year old fresh out of college buy a 1500sqft garden home for $260,000?"

I got dozens of unionized trades workers working for me who started in the trades out of HS. Got their higher education (2 years trade school paid for and got paid to sit in the classes to get it. 5 years later at 23 they're making 80K (100K with OT) with full benefits and pension. No student debt.

Marry a cute little nurse or teacher or office worker at 23 making $50k with no debt. They got no problem swinging what you list above. If interest rates were lower where they should be they could take a step up from your place.

Although we live in an area where that house is $175k because our state isn't insane.

Maybe consider your choices rather than deciding the world somehow owes you a XYZsq ft house at 23yo.

I got out of college at 23 too. My first house was at 28. It was 1150 sq ft.

You act like you're the first college grad in recorded history to be 23 and couldn't afford a house

Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
38072 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Nothing wrong with this if interest rates are low.

Except that my property taxes have increased by 70% and my insurance rates by 73% in the last three years, which caused my escrow payment alone to go up $550 a month.

Other than that, totally cool. I didn't want that extra $6600 a year anyway. Ten percent of my gross income. Awesome.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Next time you post something where you sound sure of your position I'll remember you're the guy who would cut off somebody's head to fix their toothache.


The problem is your analogy doesn't work.

We know what the problem is and that's that houses are completely overpriced. Unless you can figure out a way to make wages raise in the same amount while keeping home values stagnated over the next 5 to 10 years, there isn't a better solution than letting the market take hold.

It's the rejection of the market and capitalism that has put us in this position. This is what happens with socialist policies. Things become expensive and the market becomes irrational
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477254 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

I believe you're the one supporting driving home prices DOWN because poor wittle titty babies can't afford no home.


No, I'm a believer in the free market and I understand that the free market has price increases and price decreases. For whatever reason with housing, so-called conservatives adopt leftist economics and believe that you can use the government to manipulate the cost of housing in the way that you want.

quote:

Who says that will happen? Homes are higher because demand is greater than supply.

And the bigger Factor, artificially low interest rates used specifically to prop up the price of housing. Let's also not forget the injection of multiple trillions of dollars by Trump and Biden after covid that exacerbated and already inflated market.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43457 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 3:51 pm to
SFP 50% of the board is over 60 and the rest live in bumbfrick Egypt. You are not going to get them to understand.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram