- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did we find the Supreme Court Leaker?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:09 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:09 pm to boosiebadazz
If that article is from the msm there is 100% chance every word is a lie - have you not been paying attention. Literally nothing the msm reports is true - every single word is a lie given to them by the cia - there are only maybe 3 places to get real news online - this place - cernivitch Twitter - and Jack poso Twitter. That’s it - nothing else is truth.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:12 pm
0
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:16 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
This isn’t really about J6 at all. This is about the wife of a Supreme Court Justice possibly leaking internal deliberations of the Court to the lawyer of one of the parties trying to get before the Court.
If she was leaking internal deliberations in emails to the guy the J6 committee has the emails from why wouldn't that be mentioned. In fairness that may be in the article you are quoting but I didn't see a link in your post so based on the quotes you have there is nothing to tie Ginni Thomas to the statements. If there was you can be damned sure they would have been included.
quote:
Eastman directly corresponded with Ginni Thomas, the conservative activist and wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, as both worked to keep Trump in office after he’d lost reelection in late 2020, the Washington Post reported Wednesday evening, citing new emails the committee obtained from Eastman through a court order.
Why didn't WaPo say what was said in the direct correspondence?
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:23 pm to MFn GIMP
Not sure. That’s why I phrased it as a question. There’s certainly smoke but we don’t know if there is actually a fire.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:29 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Not sure. That’s why I phrased it as a question. There’s certainly smoke but we don’t know if there is actually a fire.
It's an interesting question, sure, but I think if there was a fire WaPo wouldn't have only insinuated that she was leaking deliberations. They would've actually said it. Right now it seems like trying to implicate her, and by extension Thomas in an effort to get him impeached and kicked off the Court, knowing there is no actual evidence.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:32 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
“The odds are not based on the legal merits but an assessment of the justices’ spines, and I understand that there is a heated fight underway,” Mr. Eastman emailed pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Cheseboro,
Odds are Eastman was just fluffing up/repackaging public info or was just fabricating here.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:37 pm to boosiebadazz
Would this be the first instance anyone has ever disclosed rumored scuttlebutt about possible behind the scenes contentiousness amongst Justices?
I want to think I've seen similar stuff on several occasions prior, but maybe I'm mistaken.
I want to think I've seen similar stuff on several occasions prior, but maybe I'm mistaken.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:41 pm to Decatur
quote:
Odds are Eastman was just fluffing up/repackaging public info or was just fabricating here.
I’m with you on that and want to believe it. But Ginni Thomas taking such an active and overt role in trying to whip votes of state legislators and otherwise machinate decertification or the Pence strategy gives me pause.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:42 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
Are you gonna provide a link to your bullshite story? Or do i need to search for it on Wapo, NYTimes, CNN, MSNBC, or Mother Jones?
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:43 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Would this be the first instance anyone has ever disclosed rumored scuttlebutt about possible behind the scenes contentiousness amongst Justices?
No, but it would be the first time (that we know of) that we know the discloser was also communicating with the wife of an active Justice who just so happened to concern herself with the affairs the discloser was also working on.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:43 pm to BugAC
Vice article but I quoted you the part citing WaPo so you could attack it on those grounds 
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:44 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Vice article but I quoted you the part citing WaPo so you could attack it on those grounds
No, i want to read the whole article. I think there's a reason you won't provide the link. We know why.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:49 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:So, are you convinced it was Mrs. Thomas, or just strongly willing to consider the possibility?
wife of a Supreme Court Justice possibly leaking internal deliberations of the Court
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:49 pm to BugAC
quote:
No, i want to read the whole article. I think there's a reason you won't provide the link. We know why.
I read it from Facebook and the link had a bunch of Facebook mumbo jumbo in it. Here is the link directly from Vice:
LINK
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:49 pm to boosiebadazz
So here's your link, coward.
LINK
No wonder you wouldn't link this pile of shite.
LINK
No wonder you wouldn't link this pile of shite.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:50 pm to Decatur
quote:
Odds are Eastman was just fluffing up/repackaging public info or was just fabricating here
Right. Weren't there reports about Justice's yelling at each other over one of the election lawsuits?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:51 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Did we find the Supreme Court Leaker?
Is anyone really looking hard?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:52 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:I never cease to be amazed by the extent that so many posters here insist upon seeing conspiracies and ulterior motives in the most innocuous events.
I think there's a reason you won't provide the link. We know why.quote:
I read it from Facebook and the link had a bunch of Facebook mumbo jumbo in it. Here is the link directly from Vice:
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
So, are you convinced it was Mrs. Thomas, or just strongly willing to consider the possibility?
According to that article, it's 100% pure speculation based off of emails we saw a couple months ago when the left wanted to get Clarence Thomas to impeach himself. It was nothing then, and it's nothing now.
Just more shite to throw up against the wall in hopes people ignore the economy, gas prices, and the general deterioration of the average private citizens' lives due to Democrat governance.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:52 pm to BugAC
Why is it a pile of shite? Do they emails from Eastman to the other lawyer exist?
Do the emails or other communications from Eastman to Thomas exist?
I know it’s got sauces, but the documents either exist or they don’t.
Do the emails or other communications from Eastman to Thomas exist?
I know it’s got sauces, but the documents either exist or they don’t.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:54 pm to BugAC
quote:
It was nothing then, and it's nothing now.
Except now we know Eastman was also talking to Ginni Thomas per emails of his he fought vociferously to keep from public view and were only turned over via court order.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News