- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did we find the Supreme Court Leaker?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:39 am
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:39 am
quote:
“The odds are not based on the legal merits but an assessment of the justices’ spines, and I understand that there is a heated fight underway,” Mr. Eastman emailed pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Cheseboro, who replied that the “odds of action before Jan. 6 will become more favorable if the justices start to fear that there will be ‘wild’ chaos on Jan. 6 unless they rule by then, either way.”
quote:
Eastman directly corresponded with Ginni Thomas, the conservative activist and wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, as both worked to keep Trump in office after he’d lost reelection in late 2020, the Washington Post reported Wednesday evening, citing new emails the committee obtained from Eastman through a court order.
I guess now we know why Eastman fought so hard to keep his e-mails from disclosure.
13
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:41 am to boosiebadazz
Are you intimating that Ginni Thomas leaked something to a liberal newspaper?
Your conflation here is pretty impressive.
Your conflation here is pretty impressive.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:44 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:45 am to FalseProphet
I think you should read that second quote again.
There’s a conflation here, but it’s not by me
You’re usually sharper than this.
There’s a conflation here, but it’s not by me
You’re usually sharper than this.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:58 am
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:49 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Did we find the Supreme Court Leaker?
No. And we probably won't because the leaker is likely the guy controlling the investigation.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:50 am to boosiebadazz
They probably gave up, it was Roberts.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:51 am
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:52 am to FlyingTiger1955
I’m sure it was a clerk. They know who it is
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:54 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I think you should read that second quote again. There’s a conflation here, but it’s not by me
In all fairness, posting about a SC leak given the current situation is most likely to make anyone think you are talking about the impending decision re:RvW. Most of us have forgotten about the supposed leak about infighting regarding the election.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:57 am to Wiseguy
quote:
In all fairness, posting about a SC leak given the current situation is most likely to make anyone think you are talking about the impending decision re:RvW. Most of us have forgotten about the supposed leak about infighting regarding the election.
I’m sure the outrage regarding both will be consistent.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:57 am to boosiebadazz
They know who it was, just not telling us common folk.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 12:00 pm to boosiebadazz
Notice the MSM have stopped reporting on this matter altogether
Posted on 6/16/22 at 12:04 pm to boosiebadazz
Thick tongued mouth breathers like you couldn’t find your own way out of a jungle gym much less locate a leaker inside the Supreme Court.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 12:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:now there is no doubt who and what you are.
boosiebadazz
Posted on 6/16/22 at 12:30 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
Someone against leaks of internal deliberations of the Supreme Court?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 12:58 pm to UFMatt
He is a Peaky Blinder named Tom Shelby.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:00 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
I hate to break it to you, but no one gives a shite about Jan. 6th except for political hacks and Democrats who are trying to deflect from their current political records.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:03 pm to BugAC
This isn’t really about J6 at all. This is about the wife of a Supreme Court Justice possibly leaking internal deliberations of the Court to the lawyer of one of the parties trying to get before the Court.
But I understand why you guys want to paint it as a nothingburger.
But I understand why you guys want to paint it as a nothingburger.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:05 pm to boosiebadazz
Great to know Clarence is ultra maga - his wife is a hero
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:06 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
But I understand why you guys want to paint it as a nothingburger.
1) The OP
2) The astonishing link you provided.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 1:07 pm to boosiebadazz
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News