Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Did Republicans Shoot Themselves In Foot on the "Fairness Doctrine"

Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:25 pm
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:25 pm
I was opposed to it because there was a time when conservative radio dominated the airwaves and I didn't want the Liberals to get equal time on any airways. Now the Liberals are virtually in control of nearly all media and I would love for conservative views to get equal time...

Thoughts?
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19524 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:29 pm to
My recollection is that the left dominated everything but radio when the Fairness Doctrine was proposed back in the 1990s. The only thing that's changed is that they're not even trying to act impartial now.

In fact the argument I heard from the right back then was, "That's a terrific idea. When are we going to apply it to TV news and the papers?" And that was about the time the Fairness Doctrine vanished.
This post was edited on 7/11/19 at 2:32 pm
Posted by frankthetank
Member since Oct 2007
2305 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:30 pm to
Yes. But the Telecommunications Act 1996, which allowed media cross-ownership, was the biggest frick up.

The combination is a liberal controlled media across all markets and mediums that crushes all dissent.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

My recollection is that the left controlled everything but radio when the Fairness Doctrine was proposed back in the 1990s. The only thing that's changed is that they're not even trying to act impartial now.



The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the FCC's view—honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the policy in 1987 and removed the rule that implemented the policy from the Federal Register in August 2011

Conservative radio exploded in the 1980's in a big way with Rush leading the way. I was fond of G. Gordon Liddy..Ha Ha
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23075 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

I was opposed to it because there was a time when conservative radio dominated the airwaves and I didn't want the Liberals to get equal time on any airways.




Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34677 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Conservative radio exploded in the 1980's in a big way with Rush leading the way. I was fond of G. Gordon Liddy..Ha Ha


Ken Hamblen, the Black Avenger, was a favorite of mine.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112486 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:49 pm to
You're conflated two issues. The 'control of nearly all media' that you're talking about has always been left wing. It's just on a larger scale of outlets and with less pretense of objectivity.

The more recent attempt to attack talk radio with the fairness doctrine has failed. The idea was to eliminate talk radio.
An analogy:

The Fairness Doctrine will tell KEEL radio in Shreveport that if you want to carry Rush then you have to carry the new AOC Talks About Communism Show.
KEEL says 'We can't sell advertising for that.'
Law: 'Then cancel Rush and you shall be in compliance.'
KEEL cancels rush and mission accomplished for the Dems. That plan failed. They might try it again some day.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
7510 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Ken Hamblen, the Black Avenger, was a favorite of mine.


I listened to him as well...really liked him.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14497 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 3:09 pm to
I think the idea of government regulating "fairness" in public media is abhorrent.

That said, I willing to try a pilot program on social media such as Reddit, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

They are already heavily liberal so best case it becomes more fair and worse case it just becomes a regulatory nightmare for these companies.

Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51413 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 3:43 pm to
Nope. Technology was different. Fairness Doctrine meant no one allowed anything remotely controversial.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

My recollection is that the left dominated everything but radio when the Fairness Doctrine was proposed back in the 1990s. The only thing that's changed is that they're not even trying to act impartial now. In fact the argument I heard from the right back then was, "That's a terrific idea. When are we going to apply it to TV news and the papers?" And that was about the time the Fairness Doctrine vanished.


Fairness doctrine was established in 1940 something (46 I think) and was the law of the land until 1987. About the same time that right wing talk radio took off nationally and the entrenchment of the "liberal" and "conservative" camps began....
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67948 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the FCC's view—honest, equitable, and balanced



The fatal flaw is that you have the government deciding

A. What is controversial

And

B. What is honest, equitable and balanced.


I can forsee a show produced by drag queens about Jesus Christ jackhammering Mickey Mouse in the doo-doo hole with a lawn dart as Garth Brooks gives birth to something resembling a cheddar cheese log with almonds on Santa Claus's tummy-tum being judged as non controversial.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27298 posts
Posted on 7/11/19 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Now the Liberals are virtually in control of nearly all media and I would love for conservative views to get equal time...


Fairness Doctrine only had authority over those who held held public licenses regulated by the FCC.Most all of cable TV or satillite radio is exempt.

The only area that it would have any effect on is broadcast radio which is already dominated by conservatives.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram