Started By
Message

re: Did Obama call for a cease fire when Hamas was shelling Israel?

Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:34 am to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119438 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Didnt he also say Israel have the right to defend themselves ?


Yes, but he meant in the context of shooting down rockets via the Iron Dome. Not going into Gaza and physically destroying and removing those rockets.

Furthermore, I don't pretend to understand exactly what Obama means all the time. One of his hallmark traits is to use hedging language. He does it all the time. His positions are soft and pliable.

The Benghazi speech in the Rose Garden was a perfect example of Obama's hedging language:

quote:

In tonight’s presidential debate President Obama maintains that he called the attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi a “act of terror”, which turns out to be accurate. However, the President is using a play on words. The full transcript below supports that assertion, which the moderator, Candy Crowley vehemently confirmed the President did do. However, the legal term of “act of terrorism” is never used. Furthermore, the President clearly implies that attack was a result of the reaction to an anti-Muslim film released on YouTube in the transcript the White House released with the video below.


LINK
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:34 am to
Expecting Hamas to accept General Al-Sisi's deal would be like expecting Israel to accept Ayatollah Khamenei's deal. If anyone was going to put a deal on the table, it should have been Recep Erdogan, not someone like Al-Sisi who has an axe to grind.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89780 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:46 am to
No, because they never really stop firing rockets for any length of time.



The refrain is that Israel can protect itself.

However, when they do retaliate - THEN the U.N. and international community want Israel to stop because, as it turns out, they can be very effective at protecting themselves when they want to.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 8:59 am to
Is it possible to have empathy for the Palestinian people and at the same time cheer on Israel to skull drag Hamas and kill every damn one of them?

All I see from the Israel haters is talk that supporting Israel means you want the Palestinian people to suffer. It's quite the opposite, I think the Palestinian people would be much better off if the IDF eliminated Hamas once and for all.

So by supporting Israel's counter-operation, I am supporting the Palestinian people.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89780 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Is it possible to have empathy for the Palestinian people and at the same time cheer on Israel to skull drag Hamas and kill every damn one of them?


I certainly don't cheer when Israel has to engage in ground operations - the potential for abuse is rife, overreaction, civilians involved, etc.

Yet, I look at the charts, see how intractable the opposition is - I mean Hamas used to be, nominally opposed to the legitimate Palestinian government - now they're incorporated into it, seemingly at the will of the Palestinian people.

quote:

It's quite the opposite, I think the Palestinian people would be much better off if the IDF eliminated Hamas once and for all.


Unfortunately, they're indistinguishable at this point, although I continue to regret the non-combatant losses - on both sides.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16934 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:08 am to
quote:

No, it doesn't. But many people recognize that the ultimate (and almost singular) goal of those "running" the Palestinian side is to kill Jews. Both short-term and long-term goal. I don't GAF about any "nation" which governs with these goals.


How widespread do you think that sentiment is? I'm sure there are a number who do take this approach but I don't see that as a general opinion of the Palestinian people nor do I see Hamas exclaiming that as their singular ultimate goal. That sounds a bit like fear mongering. I think they are driven to "kill Jews" bc they believe it to be necessary to achieve their political goals given that Israel uses force to establish the current order. That's any geopolitical conflict. Granted they use terroristic means to do so. Hamas is radical but they have only recently come to power after decades of political domination at the hands of the Israelis. And this current operation isn't going to rid the Israelis of Hamas or other extremist groups and will likely increase Palestinian feelings of desperation.

I used to have a similar take on this conflict as many of you but it's simply ineffective in ever offering a more permanent stability. If the Palestinians are going to forever be subjected to Israeli political domination then this conflict will exist in perpetuity. That is not good for Israel's long term security either. Particularly with the possibility of a few radicals getting a hold of any form of WMD.

I agree the Israelis have completely legitimate security concerns as well, especially when dealing with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad radicals. But the aggressive advancement of Jewish settlements and destruction of Palestinian homes by Jewish extremists also inflames the resentment. And utter disregard for Palestinian life, which I've seen manifest itself amongst Christian conservatives in the US much less the Jewish conservatives in Israel, is equally as counterproductive to resolution as is the disregard of Jewish life from Palestinian radicals.

I simply view this carte blanche for Israel approach to be one sided and rather dangerous. It's a complex issue, which is why it has raged with little resolution since Israel was reestablished in 1948.

Israel is the more powerful force and power actors typically use their relative power to attain more favorable deals. That's clearly a fundamental aspect of geopolitics. But subjugated weaker actors will typically resist political domination through some means or other. Both sides have been obstinate at times in making concessions. That's where we've stood for better than half a century. Neither side has clean hands and both have conflicting interests. Israel also has other external security concerns in regard to larger state actors around her as well, further complicating potential compromises with the Palestinians. The whole thing is a complicated mess and the oversimplification and blind support for Israel's interests is unsound, that is my general opinion and reaction to much of the sentiment displayed on this board.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10479 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I understood it perfectly. Hamas shelled Israel, breaking up peace negotiations. U wanted, at that point, Obama to step in and call a cease fire. How do you call a cease fire when only one side is firing shots? Shouldn't you give the other side a chance to fire back?




Exactly. O hates him some muslims, wanted Israel to get a few shots in at them before he asked for the shooting to stop.

Do you REALLY believe that?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119438 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:12 am to
quote:

So by supporting Israel's counter-operation, I am supporting the Palestinian people.



But Hamas uses the Palestinian people as human shields and Israel gets blamed in the media for killing innocent Palestinians.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111801 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I'm sure there are a number who do take this approach but I don't see that as a general opinion of the Palestinian people nor do I see Hamas exclaiming that as their singular ultimate goal.

And that's where I stopped reading.

From the charter of Hamas:
quote:

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119438 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:26 am to
Just for the record, in the Hamas Charter:

quote:

For our struggle against the Jews is extremely wide-ranging and grave, so much so that it will need all the loyal efforts we can wield, to be followed by further steps and reinforced by successive battalions from the multifarious Arab and Islamic world, until the enemies are defeated and Allah’s victory prevails.


quote:

The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!


quote:

And the Jews will not be pleased with thee, nor will the Christians, till thou follow their creed. Say: Lo! the guidance of Allah [himself] is the Guidance. And if you should follow their desires after the knowledge which has come unto thee, then you would have from Allah no protecting friend nor helper.” Sura 2 (the Cow), verse 120 There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad. The initiatives, proposals and International Conferences are but a waste of time, an exercise in futility.


quote:

When our enemies usurp some Islamic lands, Jihad becomes a duty binding on all Muslims. In order to face the usurpation of Palestine by the Jews, we have no escape from raising the banner of Jihad. This would require the propagation of Islamic consciousness among the masses on all local, Arab and Islamic levels. We must spread the spirit of Jihad among the [Islamic] Umma, clash with the enemies and join the ranks of the Jihad fighters.


LINK

Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16934 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Maybe instead of violent means the Palestinians can gain some type of retribution through international diplomatic means? But we know that won't happen because their ultimate goal is the eradication of the Jews. They've hated the Jews way before the state of Israel was formed in '48.


You are presuming the Israelis, the power actor, will voluntarily make concessions that satisfy the Palestinians interests yet may conflict with their own. Highly unlikely as the Israelis have displayed aggressive territorial ambitions in expanding settlements and displacing Palestinians. There is a religious component to all this, of course, that adds immense complication to any diplomatic resolution. And the radical Israelis certainly contribute to that as well.

And again, I think you are relying on immense oversimplification and propaganda by arguing that the Palestinians are only motivated by a desire to "eradicate the Jews."

Prior to 1948, what atrocities were being habitually committed against the Jews by Arabs in Palestine, or even elsewhere? A lot of this conflict stems from the British and French colonial rule of these areas following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent mass immigration of European Jews into the Palestinian mandate while under British control. Zionism and British treachery, in regard to permitting Arab self-governance, following the First World War are essential factors in creating this conflict. While Islam is certainly a religion apt for extremism, ethnocentrism and ethnic/religious supremacy is a strain within Judaism as well.

This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:06 am
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16934 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

And that's where I stopped reading.


Pretty pathetic if you "stop reading" when you reach a single point of contention.

Hamas is undoubtedly an extreme faction, as I've said, but any reading of their "charter" would necessarily require context. As GumboPot posted above, they came to view diplomacy as futile. I view Hamas being in power at the moment a great misfortune for the Palestinians but clearly an indication of desperation at their current state of affairs.

How old is that charter? To argue that every member or current supporter of Hamas would only accept the complete removal of Israel as a state bc of a charter is rather obtuse IMO. Initially, the Arabs absolutely sought the destruction of Israel as they viewed it's founding as unjust. Circumstances and political realities evolve. And Hamas has only very recently come to power in the Palestinian zones. So this does not necessarily then represent the position of the Palestinian people at large or throughout the conflict simply because it is indicated in the charter of Hamas. Though I certainly believe Hamas members would view it ideal, just as many Israelis would view it ideal to push the Palestinians completely out as well. This does not, however, therefore suggest some simplified intentions to "eradicate the Jews," which is typically used to imply genocide, nor that destruction of Israel can be the only solution. Though continued conflict into perpetuity certainly may lead either side to believe that only absolute victory will bring resolution. That is why this perpetual state of off and on war and antipathy is completely counterproductive and fuels the rise of extremism.

But I suppose it's easier to paint a black and white picture and portray the Israelis as pious victims to bloodthirsty Arabs who want only to kill every Jew and for the sole reason that they are Jews. This is the kind of simplified propaganda that gets thrown around and obfuscates truth and complexity.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 10:10 am
Posted by OLDBEACHCOMBER
Member since Jan 2004
7202 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:09 am to
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Joo
wth is this?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89780 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 11:14 am to
quote:

wth is this?


South Park reference.

Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16934 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 2:02 pm to
I'm sorry, what is that rocket tracker website supposed to be a response to?
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
17870 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 2:03 pm to
Obama hates the Jews. Its so obvious.
Posted by Manzielathon
Death Valley
Member since Sep 2013
8951 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 2:05 pm to
Probably your dumb arse post about what you speculate both sides really want from this debacle lmfao
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

No, because they never really stop firing rockets for any length of time.
Hamas did not launch a single rocket in 2013 or the first half of 2014. Your own chart shows a drastic drop in 2013, and like most ignorant I/P posters, you are blithely asserting that all rockets fired from Gaza come from Hamas. In fact, all the rockets in that period were launched by more extremist groups such as Islamic Jihad that were met either with arrests or killings by Hamas itself for breaking the post-Pillar ceasefire, or IDF strikes which Hamas did not respond to.

Israel responded to this 18 months of relative quiet by tightening the blockade and then in June, blaming Hamas without evidence for the murder of the three teenagers in the West Bank and detaining 300 of its people.

Do I believe Hamas are angels? Hardly. But this round of the conflict, in Gaza, is on Bibi. He ginned up this war with Hamas to undermine the unity government and because peace didn't suit his electoral math.
This post was edited on 7/22/14 at 2:26 pm
Posted by Geauxrilla Ballz
S'port
Member since Jan 2009
672 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 2:26 pm to
Sheki Ahmad Yassin on why Hamas is fighting....

Interesting. One of the founders of Hamas, some of you will remember this guy.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram