Started By
Message
locked post

Did Obama, Brennan And Clinton Illegally Collude To Take Trump Down?

Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:58 pm
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20280 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:58 pm
ETA: The title of the OP is the title of the linked article

This article is from 7/23/2018. The editors point to a comment Clapper made on CNN as evidence Obama was behind the fake dossier and connect some dots. Your boy will go down, leftist, when it’s all said and done.

quote:

Here's what Obama's Director of National Intelligence, the nation's former spy master, James Clapper, told CNN's Anderson Cooper:

"If it weren't for President Obama we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of event which are still unfolding today, including Special Counsel (Robert) Mueller's investigation. President Obama is responsible for that. It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place."


quote:

Give Hillary credit: She was adept at insinuating her phony oppo research document into the public record and at using it to weaponize U.S. intelligence agencies on behalf of her failed campaign.

But then, we all knew this had happened. What's stunning is the casual way Clapper let us know that President Obama "was responsible" for the whole shebang.

If that's so, there are really only two possibilities:

One, that a gullible Obama was fed phony information from Brennan and the Hillary Clinton campaign. He then over-reacted by tasking the intelligence community to look into it.

Or, two, that Obama knew he was dealing with tainted information. Instead of halting a bogus investigation, he let Brennan carry it forward. Why? He thought it would help elect Hillary Clinton — and cement his own presidential legacy for posterity.

At a minimum, what seems obvious is that the deep state triad of Obama, Clinton and Brennan colluded. They did it to damage Trump's campaign with allegations of Russian interference in the election. And they got the FBI and, later, a special prosecutor, to conduct a high-profile investigation.


LINK
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:19 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94555 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:59 pm to
Yes.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33012 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:59 pm to
Absolutely.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79723 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Obama knew he was dealing with tainted information. Instead of halting a bogus investigation, he let Brennan carry it forward. Why? He thought it would help elect Hillary Clinton — and cement his own presidential legacy for posterity.



I think it’s something more sinister than “cementing his legacy”.

If Hillary didn’t win, there was a chance she was going down, legally. And if she went down legally, she wasn’t going down alone. Therefore, Hillary had to win.

I honestly believe that clandestine WJC/Loretta Lynch meeting on the tarmac was the means of conveying that exact message to Obama: if Hillary went down, she was taking Obama with her.
Posted by Armchair_QB
Member since Aug 2013
1512 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:14 pm to
Obama is a stooge or a traitor.

Those are the only choices at this point. He should hang for the latter.
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
1805 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:17 pm to
Is water wet?
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:24 pm to
How do we know if any of this was done “illegally” though?

This might fall under “unethical” or not in line with protocol, but is it “illegal”? What exactly is illegal here?
Posted by Malik Agar
Member since Nov 2012
12076 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

How do we know if any of this was done “illegally” though?

This might fall under “unethical” or not in line with protocol, but is it “illegal”? What exactly is illegal here?

You must be dizzy with all that spinning
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99109 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:27 pm to
I hope we get a definitive answer one way or the other.
Posted by WizardSleeve
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2011
1802 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

What exactly is illegal here?


For starters, knowingly submitting fraudulent information to he FISA court is a felony. Lets start there.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

For starters, knowingly submitting fraudulent information to he FISA court is a felony. Lets start there.


Who knowingly sent this info? Comey?
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23727 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:31 pm to
Conspiracy to commit a fraud upon the country and to bring down a legally elected President.

Basically, a sedition conspiracy.
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm
Posted by Armchair_QB
Member since Aug 2013
1512 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Who knowingly sent this info? Comey?


Go frick yourself you fricking piece of Lib Trash shite.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

You must be dizzy with all that spinning


I get that you don’t know anything. Just, sit on the sideline next time instead of running interference.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Go frick yourself you fricking piece of Lib Trash shite.


Learn to Code
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20280 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

How do we know if any of this was done “illegally” though?


That’s what an investigation is for. The point of the op was to remind the board that Clapper already spilled the beans on who authorized the assessment
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:35 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16745 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Who knowingly sent this info? Comey?


I believe Sally Yates signature was on the original FISA doc, then Comey and RR.

That signature - they are basically testifying that the information they submit is correct, accurate, and verified, AND no other info is being withheld.

We now know that the info was incorrect, inaccurate, unverified, AND important evidence was withheld. 4 times

So. Someone goes to jail. It’s just a matter of who.
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:42 pm
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19069 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:43 pm to
Yes, but don't forget Comey and Loretta Lynch.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:43 pm to
quote:


I believe Sally Yates signature was on the original FISA doc, then Comey and RR.

That signature - they are basically testifying that the information they submit is correct, accurate, and verified, AND no other info is being withheld. 4 times.

We now know that the info was incorrect, inaccurate, unverified, AND important evidence was withheld.

So. Someone goes to jail. It’s just a matter of who.



Aw thanks that’s what I was getting at. Comey knew where the dossier came from and so did Yates apparently?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53473 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

TOKEN


You need help.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram