DHS: 75,000 non-citizens called to jury duty in New Jersey EVERY YEAR

:JohnTravoltaLookingforJohnThune:

quote:

---

Thank clowns like Bill Clinton, motor voter shite and anybody can get a DL.

---

That’s their playbook.

1. Bring in foreigners and give them government benefits
2. Allow foreigners to get drivers license
3. Automatically register people to vote when they get driver license
4. Ensure voter ID doesn’t happen.

It’s a simple 4-step plan the Democrat Party plans to use to gain absolute power.

Here is Rush Limbaugh's critique of the motor voter bill way back in 1993.

The man was a prophet.

quote:

---

He argued that the law's core purpose was not genuinely about increasing legitimate turnout, but about registering as many people as possible—especially groups likely to favor Democrats—while minimizing barriers like proof of citizenship. He frequently highlighted these issues in later years:No proof of citizenship required — Limbaugh called it "outrageous" that the law passed without mandating proof of citizenship. He saw this as intentional, allowing "anybody" to register. In a 2013 segment on Arizona's voter rules and the Supreme Court, he said: "The Democrats want as many people voting as possible... What’s the point of motor voter? ... Just to get as many people on the voter rolls because they know that the rolls are never purged."

Link to driver's licenses and potential fraud — He repeatedly tied it to "Motor Voter" enabling non-citizens or illegals to get voter registration forms when obtaining driver's licenses (e.g., in discussions of New York policies or amnesty). He described scenarios where this could lead to voter fraud, noting that people only need to sign an affidavit claiming citizenship, with little verification.

Broader Democratic strategy — Limbaugh framed it (and related policies like amnesty) as a "voter registration drive" for Democrats. He argued Democrats opposed stricter measures like voter ID because they wanted easy access to the rolls for turnout and potential fraud.

---

Guy was spot on.

There’s TONS of circumstantial evidence like this in many states. But these blue states refuse to comply with federal investigators, and therefore the leftards like SFP get to prance around pretending that no evidence exists

I would think that if any ended up on a jury it would nullify a lot of verdicts.

Someone help me out, how are they finding these things out now?