- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Derek Chauvin seriously injured in knife attack in prison
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:09 am to TigerIn2023
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:09 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
ut? I’m not Dr. Martin J. Tobin, pulmonologist, critical care specialist, physiologist, and recognized expert in respiratory failure. Nor do I think he posts here sweetheart.
Yeah and I don’t trust your version of events being just a random poster on a message board.
Are you starting to understand why appeal to authority is a logical fallacy?
And why the need to resort to name calling? Are you getting frustrated?
2
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:11 am to TigerIn2023
quote:The one who lied about etiology of Floyd's pulmonary edema? or are you addressing a different pulmonologist?
Then a rebuttal witness, a pulmonologist, critical care specialist, physiologist, and recognized expert in respiratory failure, was later called in to laugh that theory out of court.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:12 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Are you starting to understand why appeal to authority is a logical fallacy?
He doesn’t. He doesn’t know anything. That’s why he both appeals to authority and doesn’t understand the argument’s inherent weakness.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:14 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
I’m not Dr. Martin J. Tobin, pulmonologist, critical care specialist, physiologist, and recognized expert in respiratory failure. Nor do I think he posts here sweetheart.
You do realize expert witnesses are paid right? And that the prosecution has a virtually limitless budget to buy experts while the defense likely has much much smaller budget? Also the media fellated the prosecution witnesses endlessly providing perhaps an even more valuable level of remuneration.
So prosecution witnesses due to their compensation have a vested interest in saying exactly what the prosecution wants them to. Their future livelihood depends on it.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:17 am to Robin Masters
No, citing a medical expert isn't inherently an appeal to authority fallacy. It becomes fallacious if the authority's expertise isn't relevant to the topic at hand or if their opinion is taken as absolute truth without supporting evidence. However, relying on a qualified medical expert's opinion can often provide valuable information in discussions related to medical or health-related matters.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:22 am to Robin Masters
quote:
So prosecution witnesses due to their compensation have a vested interest in saying exactly what the prosecution wants them to. Their future livelihood depends on it.
Imagine believing a pulmonologist at Loyola University Medical Center is living paycheck to paycheck and willing to put their reputation on the line to commit perjury in order to keep a a few bucks coming in.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:22 am to Robin Masters
quote:If he's talking about the same pulmonologist, IIRC, the guy didn't take a fee, because he'd never done the court "expert" thing previously.
You do realize expert witnesses are paid right?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:22 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
if their opinion is taken as absolute truth without supporting evidence.
I think I found your problem.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:25 am to TigerIn2023
quote:Have you looked at the insurance or medmal industry?
Imagine believing a pulmonologist at Loyola University Medical Center is living paycheck to paycheck and willing to put their reputation on the line to commit perjury in order to keep a a few bucks coming in.
That said, did your pulmonologist actually accept a fee?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
If he's talking about the same pulmonologist, IIRC, the guy didn't take a fee, because he'd never done the court "expert" thing previously.
I wonder if being fellated by the media will enhance or hurt his future earnings?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:30 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
Imagine believing a pulmonologist at Loyola University Medical Center is living paycheck to paycheck and willing to put their reputation on the line to commit perjury in order to keep a a few bucks coming in.
Go look at how the media treated the defense’s expert after he gave his testimony. You think maybe that might dissuade experts from giving their testimony? It would me.
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 9:30 am
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:30 am to Robin Masters
He might just really be emotionally invested.
And he testified in civil cases a lot. This was his first criminal case.
And he testified in civil cases a lot. This was his first criminal case.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:31 am to Robin Masters
quote:
I wonder if being fellated by the media will enhance or hurt his future earnings?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:31 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
if their opinion is taken as absolute truth without supporting evidence
This should sting a little.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:32 am to the808bass
quote:
And he testified in civil cases a lot. This was his first criminal ca
No doubt his stock is through the roof now. This was like winning a Grammy on your debut album.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:39 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Go look at how the media treated the defense’s expert after he gave his testimony. You think maybe that might dissuade experts from giving their testimony? It would me.
Cool. Yet you aren’t claiming they declined to give testimony. You are claiming they actively lied under oath and gave false testimony.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:39 am to TigerIn2023
quote:
You are claiming they actively lied under oath and gave false testimony.
No, he’s not, simple child.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:42 am to MemphisGuy
quote:
If only he hadn't resisted arrest. He could have avoided getting himself killed. But he didn't and here he is now... dead. He literally caused his own death by his actions leading up to Chauvin restraining him.
You're basically saying resisting arrest is punishable by death, and if a suspect resists, it's totally OK if the cops kill them because they have that right.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:42 am to the808bass
quote:
No, he’s not, simple child.
quote:
So prosecution witnesses due to their compensation have a vested interest in saying exactly what the prosecution wants them to. Their future livelihood depends on it.
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 9:44 am
Posted on 11/26/23 at 9:45 am to TigerIn2023
People let things influence their language and thought all the time without outright lying. Your whole post pattern here is a convenient example of it.
Page 26 of 41
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News