- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Democrat Susan Wild named as source of illegal leaks on Matt Gaetz
Posted on 12/10/24 at 2:19 pm to uggabugga
Posted on 12/10/24 at 2:19 pm to uggabugga
Query: Why aren't members of Congress held to the same levels of secrecy as rank and file members of the armed forces?
If some cocksucking airman (because let's be honest all airmen have sucked at least one cock) had leaked information about a congressperson that airman would be in "federal pound me in the arse prison." Whether he liked that circumstance or not may vary.....
If some cocksucking airman (because let's be honest all airmen have sucked at least one cock) had leaked information about a congressperson that airman would be in "federal pound me in the arse prison." Whether he liked that circumstance or not may vary.....
0
Posted on 12/10/24 at 2:26 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
So tired of this mierda
I originally read that as “So tired of this media”.
Then I realized…media, mierda. Potato, potahto.
Posted on 12/10/24 at 2:29 pm to uggabugga
quote:
the top Democrat on the House Ethics Committee,
Ironic
Posted on 12/10/24 at 2:38 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Well then she should lose any and all committee positions.
She wasn't re-elected.
She still has a committee assignment
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:32 am to TigerOnThe Hill
this would be front page news if it involved a republican.
Susan Wild and other rotten Dems are in an ethical free fall
Susan Wild and other rotten Dems are in an ethical free fall
quote:
“‘You must be wary of those seeking to use their influence and their expertise to wrongful ends.”
Those words were spoken at the George Washington Law School commencement ceremony two years ago by the recently defeated Rep. Susan Wild (D-Pa.).
This week, the words took on a new meaning after Wild was accused of leaking information from the House Ethics Committee.
Wild embodies a party that is in an ethical and political free fall.
Wild was fighting to release the report of the investigation into former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). When Gaetz decided to withdraw from Congress, the report was not released.
That is when details from the committee were leaked to the media, and the press reported that “two sources said Wild ultimately acknowledged to the panel that she had leaked information.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:36 am to uggabugga
She thinks it was her ethical duty to leak the information for the good of the country.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 7:38 am to USAFTiger42
quote:
While a good story is just that if you received illegal information and acted on it the MSM should be in trouble too.
So that's a "no" to freedom of speech?
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:18 am to TJack
quote:
She thinks it was her ethical duty to leak the information for the good of the country.
Understated take.
To the left ethics are subjective and malleable to the circumstances. That worldview maintains that there is no objective truth ergo no objective moral standards save only that which can maintain power.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:32 am to Wolfmanjack
Her term ends soon. Kunt
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:36 am to uggabugga
She wasn’t the leaker. She lost her race so they’re using her to deflect.
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:41 am to the808bass
Posted on 12/11/24 at 8:47 am to the808bass
quote:
She lost her race so they’re using her to deflect.
This. She wasn't expendable, she was already "dead". There was nothing to lose by having her leak it. She did as instructed.
And at the end of the day, was anything in that report all that damaging? He had already withdrawn from the AG appointment.
Dems are reeling. They are looking for any possible "win" no matter how small.
This post was edited on 12/11/24 at 8:48 am
Posted on 12/14/24 at 8:53 pm to Wildcat1996
Posted on 12/14/24 at 9:14 pm to uggabugga
now what would the punishment be if you or I leaked congressional investigation testimony? That should be what happens to her
Posted on 12/14/24 at 9:19 pm to uggabugga
That fat cvnt needs a reckoning.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 9:58 pm to CAD703X
quote:
dems are scum and morally, ethically and emotionally bankrupt.
Sure this wasn't an Israeli operation?
An Israeli consulate was involved. Has the makings of a blackmail operation. Coincidentally, Susan Wild is Jewish.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 12:46 am to uggabugga
quote:
uggabugga
That is infuriating. Thanks for sharing that.
@808, why do you believe it wasn’t her? Trying to run through scenarios of who benefits from this and it just seems an outgoing congresswoman was burning the house down on her way out as she has nothing to lose. Literally.
no one gives a damn about a freaking censure. GOP is weak as hell
Posted on 12/15/24 at 8:01 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
now what would the punishment be if you or I leaked congressional investigation testimony? That should be what happens to her
Probably nothing. Do you think congress set up a harsh penalty for something one of them will almost certainly do at one time or another? Probably some nastygram from congress is all that's legally available.
Some mensa candidate mentioned "illegal" information, and there's really no such thing. The leverage for keeping secrets is done by having the people with clearances sign a non-disclosure agreement. You sign a piece of paper agreeing not to discuss ABC, you discussed ABC, now there are penalties available.
If you haven't signed one of those and you learn something classified, you can spell it out in Christmas lights on your roof. Legally you have zero obligations to safeguard that info and every right to share it. You hopefully have a lot of other ethical considerations but legally you're protected by the 1st Amendment.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 8:10 am to uggabugga
quote:
the top Democrat on the House Ethics Committee
isn't leaking this an ethical violation?
Posted on 12/15/24 at 8:31 am to TrueTiger
quote:
isn't leaking this an ethical violation?
Yes, that’s why they used her for the leak.
It’s not dissimilar to the Gaetz strategy.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News