0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: David Horowitz believes he has found the MOTHERLODE in Texas voter fraud!!
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:31 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Uh, no, and your question has no relevance to this thread
Thread police.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:35 am to Timeoday
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:36 am to cajunangelle
Always a step ahead.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does this matter if ID and in-person voting is effectively required?
Illegals can't get state IDs or DLs in TX
That's why I'm asking; that second sentence is not true for many states. Clinton didn't push motor-voter out of the goodness of his heart.
IF it turns out that the claims of more votes than voters in various districts is true, then you would agree that something is amiss, right?
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:39 am to cajunangelle
quote:
2026 was the AI warm up to 2028.
AI Agents can register to vote and request absentee ballots.
How would this work in Texas?
These are the very limited MIV eligible population cohorts:
And you have to provide identifiacton information when casting your ballot.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why is this article conflating 2022 and 2024 results?
To create a controversy.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:40 am to Flats
quote:
IF it turns out that the claims of more votes than voters in various districts is true, then you would agree that something is amiss, right?
Well I guess it is good Trump and his DOJ will be in place for another two years to investigate if necessary. In 2020, he lost and was gone.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:43 am to Flats
quote:
that second sentence is not true for many states.
I understand, but if we can show this GOP > DEM trend was valid in TX, it undercuts the argument basically anywhere else.
And also this thread is specifically about TX
quote:
IF it turns out that the claims of more votes than voters in various districts is true, then you would agree that something is amiss, right?
NYT article about this from 2024
These claims are basically always bullshite.
quote:
In 2020, Trump supporters nevertheless claimed that some states counted more ballots than there were registered or eligible voters.
One viral claim in 2020 falsely suggested that Wisconsin had counted more than 3.2 million votes when there were only 3.1 million registered voters. The claim was based on outdated data: As of Nov. 1, 2020, there were more than 3.68 million active registered voters, not 3.1 million, according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
quote:
The same idea has fueled other misleading posts on social media. Elon Musk, the owner of X, questioned on Oct. 19 whether Michigan had more registered voters than citizens this year. But his post relies on data that needs more context.
Michigan has 7.9 million citizens of voting age and just 7.2 million active registered voters. The state also has about 1.2 million inactive records on its voter roll.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:45 am to Timeoday
I think Dems have been cheating, mostly in black areas, all of my 64 year life. But ICE has spent the last two years in a massive manhunt of Latinos. They have been methodically racially profiling Latinos, and stopping them, and checking their IDs and harassing them. THIS is the main problem. So now, when the dem’s NGOs go door to door to get them to vote against ICE, they enthusiastically do so, rather than saying, “No, thanks” and going back to their family. WTF did you expect to happen?
Was there cheating? I expect so. But the cheating was there in those red years too. What is different now is that the Latino community that admired Trump’s machismo, fricking hates him now.
Was there cheating? I expect so. But the cheating was there in those red years too. What is different now is that the Latino community that admired Trump’s machismo, fricking hates him now.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:48 am to Penrod
quote:
I think Dems have been cheating, mostly in black areas, all of my 64 year life.
The problem for this argument Tuesday is that this wasn't a scenario where the large urban areas swung close elections, and voting patterns were similar to 2024 everywhere else. In 2026 everywhere, including pro-Trump areas, had a huge swing to the DEMs.
In many (most?) elections, the hyper-urban frickery could swing elections, but it's clear that wasn't necessary in 2026
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nobody has explained how the fraud could happen in a state like Texas
Nobody can explain how a black hole has infinite mass, and yet it does, or how the universe can expand at faster than light speed, and yet it does, because in both cases, the effects of such can be observed. Same goes for this fraudulent election. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:51 am to BlancoOhNo1776
quote:
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
I don't think there is even smoke for TX
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but if we can show this GOP > DEM trend was valid in TX, it undercuts the argument basically anywhere else.
A trend doesn't prove nobody cheated.
Look, you know what goes on with these NGOs & expanded early voting. I do too, so let's not pretend otherwise. They're not doing it because it reduces the chances for the left and it's difficult for them to "help" all those poor disadvantaged people all in one day, hence the resistance to having voting just on election day.
I'd bet a larger sum than I should that if voting happened in person on election day with clean rolls and ID check that Tejas (or anywhere) totals would be significantly different. Maybe enough to overturn a couple of results, maybe not, but they're not going to all that effort for nothing.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:54 am to Penrod
quote:
They have been methodically racially profiling Latinos, and stopping them, and checking their IDs and harassing them. THIS is the main problem. So now, when the dem’s NGOs go door to door to get them to vote against ICE, they enthusiastically do so, rather than saying,
Just the Democrats usurping of another demographic. White people are declining. The Republican Party is a white party. If republicans are to survive politically, they will have to run in states with higher white to minority populations. Take a look at Arkansas or Oklahoma. Comfortable majority white. As a Texan with all means to pick up and move to North Dakota if I want to, it likely is looking grim given the demographics of the state and the collection of four very large cities which unsurprisingly, are run by democrats.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:55 am to cajunangelle
Mark needs to focus more on making Pub subs
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:56 am to Flats
quote:
I'd bet a larger sum than I should that if voting happened in person on election day with clean rolls and ID check that Tejas (or anywhere) totals would be significantly different. Maybe enough to overturn a couple of results, maybe not, but they're not going to all that effort for nothing.
This doesn't necessarily show fraud or cheating, though.
Expanding access to voting typically trends to help DEMs because there are simply more DEMs in the US than anyone else.
But I don't think that's true in Texas, and, again, the results show pretty clearly that the trends were socio-political and there isn't really much evidence showing it wasn't organic. Very very red areas shifted dramatically to the DEMs. All across Texas.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:56 am to BayouENGR
Yep
Blah
Blah
Blah
US will implode from debt like rest of the world.
Blah
Blah
Blah
US will implode from debt like rest of the world.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:56 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
. The Republican Party is a white party.
There is no reason Hispanics/Latinos can't be Republican.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't think.
If you had simply stopped here, your comment would have been far more accurate. FIFY.
Posted on 11/11/26 at 7:57 am to TBoy
quote:
At least republicans are consistent in two respects. The make up fictional excuses for their failures. They lie to each other all the time. The question is what do they get out of it?
And D’s hate America and everything it stands for
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News