Started By
Message

re: DataRepublican Has Built a Tool to Map Out ANTIFA

Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:07 am to
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10572 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Didn’t it just come out that she’s been working for Hegseth?


Everything published under her name should now have a caveat: "Warning: This Content Might be Information Warfare."

Damn shame. I really appreciated her work before.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33093 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:26 am to
It’s not just her.

quote:

The Pentagon has secretly installed several conservative military veterans with large online followings in government roles, declining to disclose their assignments as they amplify Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s viewpoints and attack those who scrutinize the Trump administration, according to people familiar with the matter and corroborating material.

At least some of the influencers have been assigned to civilian roles that could lead to changes in policy, the people familiar with the matter said. Like others, they spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Neither the Pentagon nor those involved have disclosed the government roles despite the Trump administration’s claims that they are running the most transparent Defense Department ever.

Those involved include Rob Maness, a retired Air Force colonel, and Kurt Schlichter, a retired Army colonel, people familiar with the matter said. Pentagon records reviewed by The Washington Post show that both have active official government email addresses as of this past week and are assigned to the office of Anthony Tata, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness. The email addresses include a “.civ” suffix, meaning they are labeled as civilian employees, rather than as military personnel or contractors.

Both served for decades in uniform and, since retiring, have turned from the military to conservative commentary. Maness has more than 135,000 followers on X, while Schlichter has nearly 620,000.


LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481450 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:28 am to
You have tons of people who constantly post idiocy about repealing the Smith-Mundt Act, who are silent on this story
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
70294 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:29 am to
That's pretty scary.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481450 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:


That's pretty scary.


Imagine if Biden or Obama were busted doing this
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
33093 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

In an article published last month by the conservative Daily Caller, Maness argues that Hegseth’s team needs to root out “disloyal” career employees in the department and laments “careerists who treat the Pentagon as their permanent fiefdom.” That article cites his decades of military experience, but does not say whether he is a current Pentagon employee.

In an article published Wednesday on the website Campus Reform, Maness attacked a decision made by Army leaders to pull back efforts to toughen academic requirements for college students in Reserve Officers’ Training Corps programs. “Secretary Hegseth’s outrage is justified,” Maness wrote. The article likewise does not mention any government assignment.

Maness also had a letter to the editor published in The Post in July in which he defended Hegseth’s efforts to reduce the number of military officers who attend elite universities for fellowships. He describes himself there as a retired Air Force officer, but no government role is mentioned. A Post spokesperson said that Maness did not disclose any connection to the Pentagon before publication.


Where y’at, Rob?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60349 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Didn’t it just come out that she’s been working for Hegseth?


Perhaps you don't understand the term "free time"?

Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60349 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:46 am to
quote:

Max makes a good point with some of this.


The only good point he makes is to remind us that McCarthy was right.
Posted by Dee_oh_Dee
Member since Aug 2024
366 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Imagine if Biden or Obama were busted doing this


Do you mean win Biden and Obama were shadow running Twitter, everybody knew it, didn't officially come out until Elon bought it and then nothing happened?
Posted by Louisianalabguy
Member since Jul 2017
2054 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Hopefully she won't freak out time someone hands her info to break a story thinking the deep state is out to get her.

Wouldn't it be nice if DJT would get some advanced security for her?
Ever heard of Whitney Webb? She's been researching similar things and when interviewed has a photographic memory and explains connections between powerful political organizations and financial institutions.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44871 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:52 am to
Dept of Defense releasing more propaganda? Nice.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
70294 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:57 am to
Whitney just shredded the right for enabling the fusion of the deep state and big tech.
LINK
LINK
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481450 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Do you mean win Biden and Obama were shadow running Twitter,


Not entirely accurate, but sure. What were the reactions? Was that approved or criticized?

I remember it being criticzied
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11804 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

You have tons of people who constantly post idiocy about repealing the Smith-Mundt Act, who are silent on this story


Do you have proof she is pushing false information for the government?

Is her information and track record somehow not valuable because she has been a special government employee for a month?

Maybe answer the most basic questions before wondering why others aren't acting out of a place of ignorance.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2260 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Didn’t it just come out that she’s been working for Hegseth?



Why would an idea be the target of the DOW?
Posted by Louisianalabguy
Member since Jul 2017
2054 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Whitney just shredded the right for enabling the fusion of the deep state and big tech.

Yes, she's an equal opportunity critic. Does seem like we can't politically separate deep state and big tech (don't leave out big finance).
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
16601 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:16 am to
McCarthy was right... and so is Data Republican.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
16601 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:17 am to
quote:


quote:
Didn’t it just come out that she’s been working for Hegseth?


So what?


HDS
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
16601 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

quote:
Max makes a good point with some of this.


The only good point he makes is to remind us that McCarthy was right.



Exactly.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11804 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Max makes a good point with some of this


Does he? Take this, for example:

quote:

That’s right, the US “Department of War” is targeting Americans who oppose its war crimes


She is compiling a list of communists infiltrating the USA, and the dumbass Max says the only reason is because they "oppose its war crimes."

Can you not see how stupid that is? Her list has zero to do with the war. The only reason you think those 2 items are related is because it allows you to whine about Trump.

I remember a time when conservatives were actually against communism. But now, "conservatives" run cover for them as long as they can use it to attack Trump. And they still think they're the principled ones.

I'm still against communism because it's communism. I don't pretend communist organizations are good because they oppose Trump.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram