Started By
Message

re: Dan Marino suing NFL over concussions

Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:04 pm to
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

So you are telling me that a man that plays football from youth and is either injured multiple times or witnesses other injured on the field or locker room had no clue that football would be detrimental to his physical health long term?


The effects of repeated minor brain trauma take years to appear. A blown out knee is obvious when it happens.

And we are not just talking about "physical health". A trick knee or a chronically painful back are one thing. The inability to think straight or take care of your own business is MUCH worse.

If guys like Marino had known about the brain disease earlier, who's to say they would have kept playing as long? If the NFL knew, they had a responsibility to protect the players.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135699 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

How can a person sue the NFL for concussions after willingly playing a sport and making a living doing something where the risk were clearly known in advance?

Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71349 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:10 pm to
People sued and won over smoking I believe. The surgeon general warning was not enough to keep them from harming themselves.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62009 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

And we are not just talking about "physical health". A trick knee or a chronically painful back are one thing. The inability to think straight or take care of your own business is MUCH worse. If guys like Marino had known about the brain disease earlier, who's to say they would have kept playing as long? If the NFL knew, they had a responsibility to protect the players.




I get this and it's a possibility that the NFL wasn't forthcoming with the information they had on brain injuries? My problem is that guys like Marino now after the fact will pretend that they were completely clueless to the risk of playing football just to get a payday and possibly destroy a sport that made them millionaires along the way.
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:13 pm to
This law suit is probably more symbolic than monetary in nature.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18888 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:18 pm to
What is the end game with all of this? What if the league has peaked at doing everything it can to protect the players? Guys are still going to get concussions.

Is this the long winding road to the death of football?

There are doctors and studies out there that say 1 concussion is too many. I'm not sure what else can be done to mitigate these types of injuries. Moving forward I think players and the various football leagues from Pop Warner through the Pros have to determine what level of risk they are willing to assume.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41056 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:22 pm to
Wasn't he one of the least sacked QBs in the history of the NFL?
Posted by Pennymoney
Member since Sep 2012
667 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

What am I missing?!!


I've told you repeatedly. No one back then thought "getting your bell rung " was a big deal, let alone could cause long term brain damage.

Is that so hard for you to grasp?

This post was edited on 6/3/14 at 12:38 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78165 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 12:43 pm to
People have known for decades that concussions lead to permanent brain damage. The old term in boxing was "punch drunk." All these players knew but either didn't think it could happen to them or took the calculated risk.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62109 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

How can a person sue the NFL for concussions after willingly playing a sport and making a living doing something where the risk were clearly known in advance? Is this any different than a 40 year smoker suing the tobacco companies after coming down with cancer?



...even worse, how was he harmed? The guy had a very long career, had a very long second career without an effect from concussions.

This seems to be a money grab.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46671 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

It's a full contact sport where grown men are hitting each other at top speed. Every pro played ball from youth and endured multiple injuries along the way. It is unimaginable that anyone choosing this sport as a career wouldn't be aware of the long term repercussions of playing such a violent sport?


Are you saying that you believe the average NFL player in the 1980s was capable of instinctually knowing the specifics of the brain damage they would suffer from down the line?

That's pretty impressive, given that even doctors had no such knowledge then.
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17773 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:13 pm to
You can bet the left will use concussions as a reason to ban football.

Enjoy the sport while you can.
This post was edited on 6/3/14 at 1:15 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62109 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that you believe the average NFL player in the 1980s was capable of instinctually knowing the specifics of the brain damage they would suffer from down the line?

That's pretty impressive, given that even doctors had no such knowledge then.



If the Dr's. didn't know, how could the NFL be liable?
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18888 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

You can bet the left will use concussions as a reason to ban football. Enjoy the sport while you can.


Well my right leaning parents didn't let me play football until middle school because they were worried about serious injuries. Heck my mom doesn't even like watching football because of the injuries.

I don't think this is a leftist issue.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
32130 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:23 pm to
Meh, People can claim that the players are the victims. However, if you played football for a living and are trying to tell me you didn't know it was dangerous or that it would have long term adverse health effects, then I don't what to tell you, you're (the players) a moron.

It's common sense. You spend years of your life exerting THAT much physical energy all the while getting completely destroyed on the field and you act like you were going to be able to lead a normal physical life later on? Come on. It's a money grab.

If you were misdiagnosed, then I can see where you'd have a case and should receive some sort of compensation. But otherwise, you don't deserve a damn thing.

Don't want adverse health effects later on? Don't play. The players knew what they were doing and even when they were injured, they said they weren't to get back on the field. Money grab...all this is.

quote:

Are you saying that you believe the average NFL player in the 1980s was capable of instinctually knowing the specifics of the brain damage they would suffer from down the line?


I may not know every single detail of what will happen to me, but even a 10 year old can figure out that if you allow yourself to be physically hit and tackled every day for any prolonged period of time, you will suffer health-wise down the road.

This whole lawsuit is just another illustration of an ignorant group claiming they are victims of some big bad wolf owners who have money.

MONEY GRAB.

ETA: The irony here...these are the same players that talked about how much tougher they are than today's players because they didn't bitch about injuries and played through them.

Now all of a sudden you're crying about how severe your injuries are because money is involved.
This post was edited on 6/3/14 at 1:29 pm
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8528 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:35 pm to
Just wondering what Danny boy would have done if when he came out of college they had told him that he had already had one concussion so playing any more would lead to brain damage.

Or coming out of high school he couldn't sign a scholarship? And on and on. Who gets sued then? The first kid that hit him hard enough to give him a concussion?
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52919 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 1:35 pm to
He's broke, I think he lost 14 million in an investment scheme.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62109 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

He's broke, I think he lost 14 million in an investment scheme.



That makes sense.
Posted by House_of Cards
Pascagoula, MS
Member since Dec 2013
3927 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 2:06 pm to
Hall of Fame quarterback Dan Marino intends to withdraw from a concussion-related lawsuit against the NFL, according to a report by the South Florida Sun-Sentinel.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62009 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

I've told you repeatedly. No one back then thought "getting your bell rung " was a big deal, let alone could cause long term brain damage. Is that so hard for you to grasp?



And apparently you can't get that common sense tells a person that if he runs full speed into another person repeatedly, it will have detrimental affects on his body long term. Even Captain Obvious would know this.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram