Started By
Message

re: Crowd photo at March for Life

Posted on 1/24/20 at 1:22 pm to
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Don’t these people have jobs?


I’m sure they’re all community organizers.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

DavidTheGnome


So you'd rather have planned parenthood selling baby parts?

Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29224 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

So you are for murdering babies, interesting.



No I’m not, I disagree that it’s murder and I think the only people that need to be involved in that conversation is the woman and her doctor, there no place at all for the government. I also disagree with the idea that they are "babies", at least not at first.

It’s a tough and excruciating thing to go through and even though it’s painted as such it’s not always due to convenience. If a woman’s life is in danger there’s no reason whatsoever she shouldn’t be allowed to save herself. Talk about government overreach. The laws where she has to hear the heartbeat or listen to the doc say certain scripted things to shame her is ridiculous. I don’t see how anyone could say they are for small government but at the same time think that the government needs to step in and make medical decisions for a woman.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29224 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

So you'd rather have planned parenthood selling baby parts?



So long as the woman consents I don’t really care. It sounds abhorrent but I don’t know enough about it or what those "parts" are used for to really have much of an opinion honestly. It doesn’t change my stance on abortion though.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

It doesn’t change my stance on abortion though.


That’s a lazy and detestable stance.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31535 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

That question is only valid when black people are marching during work hours


Or it could be that nonskyscreamers are exponentially more selective with their marching and this has been a key human rights issue--especially for blacks--for many decades. So taxpayers take off work to attend. It's not a paid position like Soros-funded sock puppet rallies and riots.

Obligatory: idiot.
This post was edited on 1/24/20 at 7:30 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Don’t these people have jobs?


The men are working and making the money they need.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

It sounds abhorrent but I don’t know enough about it or what those "parts" are used for

How about where those fully formed and functional "parts" come from??
Posted by DevilDogTiger
RTWFY!
Member since Nov 2007
6365 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 7:54 pm to
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

depending upon his/her own personal hierarchy of rights
ah yes. "sapience."
Posted by TheHumanTornado
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2008
3773 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:08 pm to
Cute little group of cultists
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

The pregnant woman is a sapient entity who clearly does have legal rights. The early-term fetus is a pre-sapient organism in which no legal rights have yet vested.
oh my gosh. here we go

someone ask stank to define precisely when sapience is manifested in the baby or why sapience is the defining trait or what sapience actually is.

also, none of your goobledegook gives a person the right to murder another person for convenience

quote:

As the fetus comes closer to term
how discrete. glad we got that nailed down. i see now how your position is so reasonable
Posted by Rocco Lampone
Raleigh, NC
Member since Nov 2010
3051 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

I think the only people that need to be involved in that conversation is the woman and her doctor,


What about the father?
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

I disagree that it’s murder
it is and you're wrong. it's convenience murder. i don't want the baby. throw it in the trash. whatever. just don't give it up for adoption. i would rather it be treated worse than we treat animals

quote:

the only people that need to be involved in that conversation is the woman and her doctor,
who made them the moral authorities? no one.

quote:

I also disagree with the idea that they are "babies"
well then you're just stupid and you really can't be helped

quote:

If a woman’s life is in danger
oh please. stop it. no one is arguing these cases. the question is the 95% of abortions where the mom can't be bothered with motherhood

quote:

The laws where she has to hear the heartbeat or listen to the doc say certain scripted things to shame her is ridiculous
yeah we wouldn't want to defend the life of the baby now would we

quote:

make medical decisions for a woman
this is not a medical decision genius. it's a moral decision. the baby's right to life. i realize that's too complicated for you to understand.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:24 pm to
That^ All that^.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32013 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:34 pm to
quote:


oh my gosh. here we go

someone ask stank to define precisely when sapience is manifested in the baby or why sapience is the defining trait or what sapience actually is.



Never mind the fact that if it’s ok to murder a “non sapient” human than its ok to murder someone undergoing surgery.

There is no logical argument that can not make abortion murder.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:42 pm to
his idiotic argument is that a non sapient fetus is essentially an animal and we don't have a problem killing animals. as i enumerated in my prior post, i have discovered that he doesn't even understand his own stupid argument. but then he can't refute that there is no personhood gap between offspring and parents.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

its ok to murder someone undergoing surgery
oh trust me, i have brought this up multiple times. his position makes it ok to murder all sorts of people, i.e. euthanasia. i have pointed him to the sled test but he plays coy and acts like he doesn't know what it is. in one thread he resorted to criticizing vocabulary words i used that he hadn't heard of before.

hank is up there in the pantheon with ibchina and 90npc.
Posted by TigerChief10
Member since Dec 2012
10858 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:12 pm to
He explained exactly what the difference is. Way to ignore it dipshit
Posted by TigerChief10
Member since Dec 2012
10858 posts
Posted on 1/24/20 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

If a woman’s life is in danger there’s no reason whatsoever she shouldn’t be allowed to save herself.

this is a complete strawman. No sane person argues this.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram