re: COVID vaccine boosters could be necessary as soon as September

One of my doctors, who’s also a pharmacist told me that a booster is actually needed in as early as two months after your second shot. The “vaccine” is a joke.

quote:

---

"The data that I see coming, they are supporting the notion that likely there will be a need for a booster somewhere between eight and 12 months," Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said

---

Which makes me ask: are these really vaccines or are they merely symptom management of some sort?

To me, vaccines have two jobs:

1. Provide long-term immunity to a disease
2. Prevent disease transmission

Needing a booster in just six months, especially after needing a two-stage shot to begin with, fails the first criteria. Add to this that people are still testing positive after getting their shots and this underscores that failure.

The second point is failed with the rhetoric of those who have already been vaccinated needing to continue wearing masks in order to not infect the non-vaccinated.

We have large failures on the two major points I consider to be critical in determining if something is an actual vaccine so why would I get it in the first place, much less the booster?

going to be hard to get a booster for something I didnt get to start with

This is EXACTLY why I was waiting until closer to fall. People need to treat these vaccines like the flu vaccine. Take it in the fall to get coverage through the spring and allow the warm and sunny months to suppress the disease organically.

quote:

---

Do you consider the flu shot a vaccine?

---

A flu shot is a vaccine, it just has an incredibly narrow scope. The doctors and pharmacists roll the die on what they believe will be the strain du jour for the upcoming flu season and trot out shots for that variant. Sometimes they get lucky, sometimes they roll snake eyes.

The COVID "vaccine" fails within its own strain. Thanks for giving me the platform for explaining that difference.

I usually don't get the flu shot because when I do there is a 100% chance I'll be out sick for a few days with flu-like symptoms. When I don't, it's 50-50 that I'll be out sick.

My odds are better depending on my immune system.

quote:

---

Just say you are a pussy about getting shots

---

I'm sorry, did I threaten your fear porn festival by bringing up cogent points? Sucks to be you.

As for getting the shot, I don't need to as I've already been exposed to it and survived. NIH article

So feel free to continue to cower behind your little chin diaper while in your lemming line for booster shots which will continue to quickly fail (if it works at all) while struggling futilely to convince yourself otherwise, meanwhile I'll keep asking questions which piss you off to the point of insults just for my asking them (which is the most telling thing of all).

Surprise, surprise... a vaccine needs a booster. Big deal.

It was a joke. But if the shoe fits.....

quote:

---

I think you're supporting my position?

---

Absolutely. The chance we'd lose complete immunity within a year subsequent to the 2-shot vaccines is roughly ZERO. But looking at the daily case curve falloff, odds are we won't really need it anyway.