Started By
Message

re: COVID-19 vs Influenza = False Narrative

Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:18 pm to
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21563 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

And that is why it is a nothingburger and the hysteria over it is ridiculous.


The media hysteria? Absolutely.

The Trump admin's reaction to issue travel restrictions and advisories? No.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111513 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

That's been my stance all along.


I’m agreeing with you on it.

quote:

What specifically about it?


You aren’t coherent. You take Chinese numbers when it boosts the mortality rate and then discount them when it doesn’t help you. You completely ignored the numbers in Singapore because, well, it’s not clear.
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:19 pm to
Numbers from countries around the equator make it appear that warm weather definitely effects this thing.

No one is really dying outside of colder climates.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

COVID-19 vs Influenza = False Narrative
The comparison is in handling and presentation.
It is a response to the laypublic asking "What should we expect? / How should we act and react?"

Influenza is an excellent analogy.

Sure, there absolutely are differences in symptomatology, course homogeneity and virulence, but there are also similarities. Discounting those serves no purpose.
quote:

One problem with comparing this to Influenza is that you're comparing the combined results of (at least) 2 strains of Influenza to the one strain of COVID-19.

That changes CFR not one iota.

quote:

Another problem with comparing this to Influenza is that Influenza has had worldwide saturation for at least a century
There are over 100 strains of flu. Cross-immunity is not conferred.
quote:

meanwhile COVID-19 is only ~3 months old and thus doesn't have nearly the depth of saturation as does Influenza.
20% of common colds are caused by a coronavirus, just a different strain from COVID-19.
This post was edited on 2/29/20 at 2:26 pm
Posted by FlexDawg
Member since Jan 2018
12812 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:23 pm to
Let me edit your post:

Subject
This whole CV thing

Message

Yawn
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21563 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

You take Chinese numbers when it boosts the mortality rate and then discount them when it doesn’t help you.


No, I see their numbers as an absolute floor. It's not less, but it could be more. That's how communist regimes operate.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21563 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Numbers from countries around the equator make it appear that warm weather definitely effects this thing.

No one is really dying outside of colder climates.


I linked a study that tested virus survival rates on various surfaces in various temps. As expected higher temps significantly cut down the virus' ability to survive outside the body. Like from days to hours type reduction.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46041 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:30 pm to
You deserve an upvote for hanging tough and completing the OP.....I did read it, well done.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51580 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Cliff notes? No body is reading all that.


And thus why we have multiple threads with people saying this is a big nothing and this is the end of the world.

Stop being lazy.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21563 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

but there are also similarities.


They're both respiratory virus, that's about it. The flu isn't airborne (sneeze droplets don't count), while coronavirus is. That within itself should discount any comparison. It's much more contagious. That's how you went from one, or a handful of people in the Wuhan foodmarket to tens of thousands in a month and a half. The flu doesn't spread that fast from one, or a handful of people.

Comparing this to the flu could give the impression that we need to react as if its the flu, after all who's died in America?

No, we need to play it safe, shut down travel from China, Iran, and anyone else who doesn't seem to be able to contain it.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34901 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

if it wasn't so obvious that the left was basically cheering for this thing to be bad the reaction might be more measured


There is an old saying out in the hard and dangerous Construction community..."sh*& and fall back in it". That is exactly what the Left is doing, as there is not a sane individual in this Nation that would pick Bernie Sanders or Joe Biden over Trump to run the show in a CRITICAL and dangerous National Security scenario. Hell, BOTH have raised their hands and pledged and OPEN BORDER with Universal Healthcare to all comers. I can just see them sell that on Stage when Trump calls them out for the insanity and moral outrage of selling out the American Citizenry for their delusional and essentially impossible virtue signaling, vote buying atrocity. Like Biden saying He WILL raise people's taxes.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65074 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

he flu isn't airborne (sneeze droplets don't count), while coronavirus is.


Inaccurate.

This report from NBC News from 2018 said that new research has revealed that the flu virus might in fact spread through the air.

quote:

The flu virus might be spread not only by coughing and sneezing, but also simply by breathing, researchers say in a new report.

That may not sound surprising, but the common wisdom among flu experts has been that flu was not an airborne virus but only spread by fairly large droplets, from coughing or sneezing.

The new study found clear evidence that influenza patients breathe the virus out through their mouths and noses in tiny particles that can stay suspended in the air for minutes or hours.


LINK
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51580 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

No one wants to read an essay, bruh.


Which is a big part of the problem. I've laid out everything in a very easy to understand manner. Anyone wanting to discuss it without reading at least that much is doing both themselves and others a disservice.

quote:

Having said that, it's easy to straddle the fence with topics like this one. It's also intellectually dishonest. The facts are there for us to see. There is no reason to mediate or to be a moderate.


Wrong. The fence is exactly where we should be right now because we're so early into this. There's absolutely no benefit for over or under reacting other than stroking the ol e-peen once your "side" is proven right.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123887 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

The flu isn't airborne (sneeze droplets don't count), while coronavirus is.
Negative!
quote:

The flu doesn't spread that fast from one, or a handful of people.
Not true, the assumed R0s are nearly identical.

This post was edited on 2/29/20 at 2:45 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21563 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

This report from NBC News from 2018 said that new research has revealed that the flu virus might in fact spread through the air.


Interesting, I wonder what's making this virus so much more contagious than the flu, then.

EDIT: I have to wonder if more follow up was done, as I've heard this repeated several times in the last week.
This post was edited on 2/29/20 at 2:42 pm
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30112 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:40 pm to
Baw, we have a relatively healthy percentage of folks 'round these parts that begin their posting day as an amateur attorney and wrap it up as an amateur physician. And any number of areas of amateur expertise all throughout.

I can only stick with one area, don't really have the energy or will to venture into other areas of expertise. Plus, I sorta feel dumb acting like it.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65074 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Which is a big part of the problem. I've laid out everything in a very easy to understand manner. Anyone wanting to discuss it without reading at least that much is doing both themselves and others a disservice.



I read through it. I was just giving you grief for writing it.

quote:

The fence is exactly where we should be right now because we're so early into this.


We're three months removed from patient zero. This thing first popped up in Wuhan back in December. To date, there have been only 85,000 infections - of which the vast majority were infected from the city of Wuhan. The metropolitan population of that city is roughly 19 million. That means the virus infected less than .04% of the population of Wuhan. The numbers are probably higher but I doubt they are significantly higher.

This thing is already showing signs of slowing down and it's very likely we won't be talking about it three months from now.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65074 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Interesting, I wonder what's making this virus so much more contagious than the flu, then.


It's not more contagious. It's just deadlier.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51580 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Those mortality rates are almost certainly inflated due to the fact that many cases go undiagnosed.


I don't disagree with that and it's a reasonable assumption but the uncertainty of the Chinese numbers is just enough to keep us from guessing how far off it is. As I mentioned, we'll be in a far better place to make an assumption like that once we're a month or three down the road.

I've made this point a few times in a few thread but I think it's worth repeating that if this gets loose in a San Fran, LA, Seattle, etc opioid-addicted homeless population then I think we see a spike in domestic mortalities that will play into the media's hype narrative. It's something we should be mindful of before it happens (and should actually be pondered by pundits now) so it isn't such a shock if it comes about.

quote:

It is common that in almost all new disease cases the apparent mortality rate shrinks as familiarity with the disease grows


Agreed, but that's the problem because right now it's still very new. People want a definite course of action immediately instead of waiting to see what the best course actually is.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 2:50 pm to
Very reasonable post Bard .... I upvoted.

Everyone hitting you with the traditional (on this forum) TL;DR are assclowns.

frick'em because you pretty much nailed it as it stands right now even with the 1st reported U.S. death this morning.

Bottom line, don't panic, just take precautions and be prepared. Be educated, stay informed, don't completely ignore it but don't obsess over it either.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram