- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Court grants Texas woman's request for emergency abortion in historic ruling
Posted on 12/9/23 at 7:57 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
Posted on 12/9/23 at 7:57 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
Well maybe Texas should change it’s laws to allow it for babies with horrible body defects.
In many cases it is, if there are appropriate conditions not covered, it should be amended. These laws are new and will obviously require tuning.
Don't believe anything you read in our trash news about a ruling from a Travis county judge.
Almost certainly all fabricated.
0
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:04 am to LSU2ALA
quote:
You just assume she has the means to travel.
She didn’t argue she didn’t have the means to travel. She argued that she was a “life-long Texan.”
Don’t be confused about what’s happening here. This is a test case push back on Texas abortion law. Not a woman seeking emergency healthcare.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:19 am to LSU alum wannabe
quote:
Trisomy 18 is either swift death or slow death while a young family piles up staggering medical bills for high acuity NICU to early Pedi care. THEN a dead baby.
Saying they can’t live is a lie though
So here is a plan, let’s line up everyone with a terminal illness and murder them.
Because that’s what you are advocating.
This post was edited on 12/9/23 at 8:20 am
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:27 am to dgnx6
quote:
Saying they can’t live is a lie though
So here is a plan, let’s line up everyone with a terminal illness and murder them.
Because that’s what you are advocating.
So you are saying no parent can take a child off of life support if there's a heartbeat?
The fetus will not live or have any quality of life and maybe not even brain capability. Do you know what trisomy 18 looks like?
That this fetus that has no means of survival must be kept alive via the mother? Is this not the same as forcing a parent to keep a brain dead child alive if there's a heartbeat?
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:30 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Following Thursday's ruling, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office issued a statement saying the temporary restraining order "will not insulate hospitals, doctors, or anyone else, from civil and criminal liability for violating Texas' abortion laws."
Paxton's office also included a letter sent to several medical centers outlining action it will take against doctors who perform an abortion.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 8:34 am to mahdragonz
quote:
Is this not the same as forcing a parent to keep a brain dead child alive if there's a heartbeat?
First, no.
Second, the state AG’s office may or may not have someone who is actually looking at the information submitted by the doctor. It may be woefully inadequate. It may not. But we don’t know that. You’re assuming the mother is a simple victim of the system and circumstance. I would guess nothing is as simple as the media is making it out to be in this case.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 11:46 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:It is quite liberating to know you have a rational basis for your moral paradigm and can provide true meaning to life.
Sounds mentally liberating to be honest.Do you ever question your belief in God or have you ever?
I’ve questioned my belief in God a lot. I’ve had debates and discussions with atheists and people of other religions for years who asked difficult questions that I didn’t always have the answers to that shook my faith for a brief moment. Every time, God provided me the answer sufficient to give me confidence in the truth of His Word. Not much shakes me any more.
Posted on 12/9/23 at 11:58 am to Hobie101
Why can’t she just go to a different state to get her procedure?
Posted on 12/9/23 at 12:08 pm to fischd1
quote:
Why can’t she just go to a different state to get her procedure?
Husband / family who assist in any way with her leaving the state for the procedure would be in violation of the state law. Husband drives her out of state - guilty. Drives her to airport so she can fly to a different state - guilty. Wife uses money from shared bank account to travel out of state - husband guilty for "his" funds being used.
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:59 am to fischd1
quote:
Why can’t she just go to a different state to get her procedure?
Small govt Republicans implemented laws to penalize any one that may help.
It's no wonder everyone fricking hates them.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:41 am to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
It's no wonder everyone fricking hates them.
I picture you having to wear a helmet at all times.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:44 am to Hobie101
quote:
These laws are moving humanity backwards
Exactly the opposite. Abortion is moving humanity backwards.
quote:
He said under state law doctors can use "reasonable medical judgement" in providing an emergency abortion to protect a woman's life at risk, but that it didn't appear Cox met that definition.
Molly Duane, Cox's attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights, said that standard is impossible to meet without harming a woman.
Molly Duane is full of crap. She's actively arguing for the only procedure that would harm this woman in any way.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:45 am to OleVaught14
quote:
Husband / family who assist in any way with her leaving the state for the procedure would be in violation of the state law. Husband drives her out of state - guilty. Drives her to airport so she can fly to a different state - guilty. Wife uses money from shared bank account to travel out of state - husband guilty for "his" funds being used.
Good. They should all be subject to laws equivalent to murder, attempted murder, accessory to murder, etc.
Posted on 12/11/23 at 8:53 am to OleVaught14
quote:
Husband / family who assist in any way with her leaving the state for the procedure would be in violation of the state law. Husband drives her out of state - guilty. Drives her to airport so she can fly to a different state - guilty. Wife uses money from shared bank account to travel out of state - husband guilty for "his" funds being used.
That’s a very broad reading of the statute. The examples given in the statute are nowhere near that broad.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News