- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Conversation with a liberal about ivermectin
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:25 pm to Jizzy08
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:25 pm to Jizzy08
quote:
based on this study alone
You’re wasting your time in here explaining how to analyze clinical studies.
A study = a study = a study when it comes to this board.
They're convinced these studies are being suppressed, not that they’re flawed or inconclusive in some way.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:28 pm to Jizzy08
It’s a case control study over a short amount of time in a few healthcare workers.
Confounders could include 10 people in one group wearing n95s inappropriately for a few hours.
Confounders could include 10 people in one group wearing n95s inappropriately for a few hours.
This post was edited on 8/30/21 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:33 pm to Norbert
quote:
They're convinced these studies are being suppressed, not that they’re flawed or inconclusive in some way.
Can’t argue with the webmd’s
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:36 pm to Jizzy08
quote:
I would not recommend ivermectin.
Why not?
Because it may not work or because it could be dangerous?
Unless you feared it may be dangerous, what is the risk in trying?
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:37 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
There are a lot of bad doctors out there
Yep. Critical thinking and scientific method are afterthoughts at best. I find a similar phenomenon in law practice.
We've trained a bunch of technocratic, self-absorbed pedants.
This post was edited on 8/30/21 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:38 pm to Norbert
quote:
You’re wasting your time in here explaining how to analyze clinical studies.
A study = a study = a study when it comes to this board.
They're convinced these studies are being suppressed, not that they’re flawed or inconclusive in some way.
Nice straw man.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:41 pm to deeprig9
quote:Yep.
This is what we're dealing with folks.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:46 pm to novabill
I simply said that based upon that study that was posted, I would not recommend based upon my analysis of the study. Doctors misread and misinterpret studies all the time. In fact, drug companies send people out to bad doctors all the time in hopes they are either too gullible or too ignorant to know how to read medical literature so they can get them to prescribe a medicine their patients don’t need.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:48 pm to deeprig9
Democraps would rather kill the messenger than listen to ANY message
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:48 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
I spent like 3-4 years going through pretty serious medical stuff. The younger doctors are the absolute worst, especially in hospitals. You can tell they don’t really like their jobs. They got into it for the money and status. They treat people like they are a nuisance. There are a lot of bad doctors out there
My deceased mother was a nurse and went to nursing school in the early 1940’s. Most of the nurses and doctors from that era looked at the medical profession as a calling just behind being called to the ministry. A lot of the nursing colleges 60-70 years ago were affiliated with Christian denominations.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:51 pm to deeprig9
It treats parasites not anti-viral.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:53 pm to washparkhorn
quote:
Do you mind sharing the link to the study?
Here’s India’s #’s… The graphs and data from the Johns Hopkins University CSSE database do not lie.
India's Ivermectin Blackout
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:53 pm to deeprig9
quote:
LINK /
You're way out of your fricking realm here homie. Start listening to scientists and not some nuttjob preacher.
quote:
The mean duration of hospitalization after treatment was 9.7 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.1–11.0 days) in the placebo group, 10.1 days (95% CI 8.5–11.8 days) in the ivermectin + doxycycline group, and 9.6 days (95% CI 7.7–11.7 days) in the ivermectin alone group (p = 0.93).
LOL, it's the same as the placebo. The shite literally does NOTHING.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:54 pm to Jizzy08
quote:
I’m as conservative as they come on this board but based on this study alone, I would not recommend ivermectin.
That's fine. You should be able to make this recommendation. Would you prescribe it, if requested?
The problem with this is everyone sites low numbers in the studies to discredit the use. All studies start out with low numbers. With all the media, politicians, and govt doctors shitting all over the "horse paste", how would you ever get a large scale study.
Just observing, between deep south Georgia with ivermectin and Florida with Regeneron, we should know by end of September if either work.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 7:59 pm to wt9
My job isn’t to give a patient what they request if it goes against my better judgment. I give a patient options and they choose from these options. I treat the vaccine the same way—I give them the information and I don’t shame them of their choice no matter if I disagree or not. If they want to go to another doctor, I am perfectly cool with that.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 8:00 pm to Jizzy08
quote:
#1 the number of people included in the study is pretty low. 72 of a potential 113 is not very many in the grand scheme.
#2 They did not include people with serious health conditions, which is important as these are the people that are at most risk for serious illness
#3 The primary outcome is viral clearance and remission of fever. To a clinician, we don’t care about either of these two. A primary endpoint of mortality needs to be the focus for hospitals and doctors to start recommending it.
So exactly how conservative are you? Would a study group of 26M convince you?
The city of Delhi began mass distribution of invermectin in late April. The results were tracked by John Hopkins.(a) In 28 days the cases dropped 97%. Other jurisdictions saw similar drops. (b)
One jurisdiction that stopped the distribution saw cases and deaths rise 10-fold for the same 28 days.(c) Less than 10 percent of India’s population was fully vaccinated at the time.
India is now the first country on the planet to be recommended to move from pandemic to endemic stage concerning Covid.(d) And yet when Delta broke out, people were being stacked in the streets.(e) But 29 days later . . .
a)
b)
quote:
Among the most prominent examples include the Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa where cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively.
c)
quote:
"Your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021.” After Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India. Tamil Nadu deaths increased ten-fold.
d)
quote:
Chief Scientist of the World Health Organization Soumya Swaminathan said, "We may be entering some kind of stage of endemicity where there is low-level transmission or moderate level transmission going on but we are not seeing the kinds of exponential growth and peaks that we saw a few months ago in India.”
e)
quote:
The delta variant is continuing to vex health officials and researchers two months after India’s case numbers touched a horrific peak in May of more than 414,000 daily cases, then suddenly dropped and stabilized.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 8:13 pm to Jizzy08
I get that. But thiscdrug has been around for year.
Would you not try it because it may not work or fear that it may cause harm?
Would you not try it because it may not work or fear that it may cause harm?
Posted on 8/30/21 at 8:16 pm to RobbBobb
I’m conservative enough that my political beliefs shouldn’t affect nor interfere with my recommendations to patients, the way it should be.
Posted on 8/30/21 at 8:18 pm to BigoBoys
quote:
It treats parasites not anti-viral.
False dilemma / dichotomy
Begs question.
Did you people ever learn to make logical arguments?
This post was edited on 8/30/21 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 8/30/21 at 8:20 pm to BigoBoys
quote:
It treats parasites not anti-viral.
Thats not true. Ivermectin won the Nobel prize in 2015. It is also on the WHOs list of Essential medicines. An NIH study called it a wonder drug, and put its unrealized potential alongside aspirin and penicillin, And was prescribed about 100,000 times a year in the U.S. (of course, before we ever heard of corona). Heres your study:
LINK
quote:
There are few drugs that can seriously lay claim to the title of ‘Wonder drug’, penicillin and aspirin being two that have perhaps had greatest beneficial impact on the health and wellbeing of Mankind. But ivermectin can also be considered alongside those worthy contenders, based on its versatility, safety and the beneficial impact that it has had, and continues to have, worldwide
LINK
A study specifically using ivermectin for covid
quote:
Interpretation: Ivermectin treatment was associated with lower mortality during treatment of COVID-19, especially in patients with severe pulmonary involvement.
LINK
Study that promotes ivermectin to fight tumors
quote:
* Ivermectin effectively suppresses the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells and promotes cancer cell death at doses that are nontoxic to normal cells.
* Ivermectin shows excellent efficacy against conventional chemotherapy drug-resistant cancer cells and reverses multidrug resistance.
* Ivermectin combined with other chemotherapy drugs or targeted drugs has powerful effects on cancer.
Popular
Back to top


2






