- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Conservative films himself being shouted off campus by an angry crowd at HBCU
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:32 pm to wackatimesthree
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:32 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Am i going to have to post videos of Kirk debating this exact issue with black college students?
Kirk debated.
These retards didnt. They put up provocative signs to elicit a response, and you dipshits fell for it
2
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:32 pm to BigTx
quote:
He went to campus, not to debate, but looking to get a reaction.
Isn't that kind of the point? Get people to have an opinion on the subject so it can be discussed?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:32 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Oh I know, just wanted to get them to admit it.
They have no problem or shame admitting it... that's actually part of the problem, imo.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:33 pm to Dawgfanman
No he wouldn’t, he’s a hypocrite
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Another Autistic one
Here you go, Grand Wizard...
Charlie Kirk debating DEI with black student #1
Charlie Kirk debating black students about DEI #2
Charlie Kirk debating DEI with black man #3
How many of these do you want? That was a 30 second search.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:34 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Please explain. You argued that desiring a debate on an HBCU campus about illegal immigration and DEI practices was akin to "she wore that skirt of her own volition."
Here. Do you need it in crayon?
These retards didnt want a debate. Youre simply naive and well, not very bright.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:35 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Kirk debated. These retards didnt. They put up provocative signs to elicit a response, and you dipshits fell for it
Charlie Kirk literally sat under a tent that challenged people to prove him wrong. That wasn’t designed to elicit a response?
Can you make a point without ad hom insults?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:35 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Here you go, Grand Wizard...
These people did not want to debate.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:35 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Am i going to have to post videos of Kirk debating this exact issue with black college students?
At an HBCU?
Wearing a Maga hat?
With a sign derogatory towards DEI?
Yes, post the Kirk video doing the exact- exact- same thing.
I'm not saying Kirk didn't debate the topic.... I just don't think I've seen a clip of him doing it in this kind of way.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:36 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Charlie Kirk literally sat under a tent that challenged people to prove him wrong.
Sure. But he didnt put up provocative signs, he debated.
Your mistake is thinking these retards wanted to debate. They didnt, they want clicks.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Here. Do you need it in crayon? These retards didnt want a debate. Youre simply naive and well, not very bright.
Can you debate anything without insults? While you’re on your soapbox about what Charlie would’ve done and all, seems you’d tone down the insults.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:37 pm to L.A.
I guess they don't want a debate. So tolerant. Oh, well it goes both ways. I will file this video away with all the liberals debating Charlie Kirk that we assaulted, murdered, and run off of the campus.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Sure. But he didnt put up provocative signs, he debated.
The tent was provocative. Prove me wrong on a college campus full of libs isn’t something that is designed to elicit a response?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:37 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
This guy is trying to take advantage of a vacuum left by Kirk's death. He's not actually doing anything Kirk didn't do himself.
Cam works for TPUSA and has been doing the same kind of college campus debates that Charlie did since 2019.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:38 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Can you debate anything without lying?
Answer this first, genius, since you started it all
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:38 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
The tent was provocative.
If youre a fig
Are you?
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:38 pm to wackatimesthree
waka... Not to be nitpicking, but those three videos did not seem to be on an HBCU campus.
I WILL award point for the DEI shirt worn while speaking to a black person.
I WILL award point for the DEI shirt worn while speaking to a black person.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:38 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
Isn't that kind of the point? Get people to have an opinion on the subject so it can be discussed?
Are you retarded or just playing retarded. If there was legit discussion had, I doubt we would have seen that video. Plus I really doubt that’s what he wanted.
But I agree. Ideally , dialogue would be great. I’ve had it with coworkers that I assumed that I’d disagree with and I believe in all instances, we have benefited from the discussions. I wish more of that went on, but satan sows division in so many ways.
Edited…forgive the harsh words. I didn’t have to speak like that. My apologies.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Kirk debated.
This guy does too.
Do you think he doesn't have other videos on YouTube?
What an insufferable moron; you think this is a one-off, don't you?
This guy is trying to take Kirk's place. He's putting up videos as fast as is humanly possible.
quote:
They put up provocative signs to elicit a response, and you dipshits fell for it
This is what you are so stupid that you can't understand. There was nothing "provocative" about the sign they put up. In what universe is inviting college students to debate DEI a "provocative" sign?
I guess in your KKK universe, but in the real world, college students should be able to handle that without rioting.
Now, did the guy want a reaction? So that he could get clicks? Sure.
But anyone with an IQ above 70 (which apparently disqualifies you) understands that two things can be true at once. Just because the guy was looking for clicks doesn't mean that the student's reaction was appropriate.
You somehow seem to be defending it as though it was. Which either makes you the dumbest a-hole on this site (which is saying a lot), or the most racist (which, now that I think about it, is also saying a lot.). Or both.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 1:39 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Answer this first, genius, since you started it all
Do you need a hug or something? You've been so angry and quick to insult others for a simple disagreement which is direct opposition to what Charlie did.
Page 6 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News