Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Congress Members Can Use Campaign Funds for Bodyguards, FEC Rules

Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:29 am
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24803 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:29 am
LINK

Congress members will now be permitted to use campaign cash to hire bodyguards, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) ruled Thursday, after hours of debate.

Under the FEC ruling, House and Senate members may use campaign funds to hire private security personnel without violating the prohibition on personal use, for occasions when they aren’t under the protection of Capitol law enforcement on the Hill.

It comes amid heightened concern about the safety of lawmakers amid the tense political climate across the country and the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol building. The Department of Justice said late January that more than 150 people have been charged over the incident.

The FEC ruling comes after attorneys representing the National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee submitted a letter (pdf) to the six-member commission on Jan. 26 asking for guidance on whether lawmakers can use campaign funds to pay for personal security personnel “to protect the Member and the Member’s immediate family from threatened harm.”

“In light of current events involving concrete threats of physical violence against Members and their families, Members have been compelled to consider further security measures for themselves and their families,” the officials in their letter January. “As has been well-documented in the media, Members and their families continue to endure threats and security breaches, which are being timely reported to appropriate law enforcement officials.”

The commission previously ruled that lawmakers could use campaign cash to upgrade their home-security systems.

Prior to Thursday’s ruling, the regulator allowed the use of campaign funds for personal security if there was evidence that lawmakers could face specific, immediate threats while carrying out their official duties.

Last year, a total of 4,894 threats were made against lawmakers tracked by Capitol law enforcement, up from 902 threats in 2016. The number of threats is expected to rise further this year, Politico reported.

...
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57376 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:30 am to
Thanks. Now applying for a “bodyguard” position
Posted by BiteMe2020
Texas
Member since Nov 2020
7284 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:30 am to
Why not pay for their rubbers, too? I mean, Eric Swalwell could have been assassinated by an STD, for Pete's sake.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36096 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:31 am to
So politicians can use donations from voters to protect themselves while they attempt to deny voters the right to protect themselves by owning firearms.
Posted by chity
Chicago, Il
Member since Dec 2008
6083 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:32 am to
Should be called the No Show Nephew Job Rule.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34723 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:33 am to
At least one Republican has been attacked by a leftist loon..
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
4475 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:35 am to
All this will do is embolden even more (if that's possible) democrats to go after 2nd Amendment to disarm the public, since they will now have funds to pay for their own private security details. rules for thee but not for me..
Posted by 33inNC
Charlotte, NC
Member since Mar 2011
4990 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Should be called the No Show Nephew Job Rule.


This. Just give yet another reason for these assholes to pay family members to do nothing. fricking leeches.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20288 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:48 am to
Why not just let political parties hire their own armed security forces to protect members? They can have their own uniforms and names like, The Republican Guard or People's Liberation Security Force.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76529 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:52 am to
People would be pretty surprised what you can legally use campaign funds on.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95833 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 11:54 am to
This hearing should have consisted of Scalise walking in, showing his gunshot wound, and doing a mic drop.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105418 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 12:12 pm to
I am sure we will see their good friends and family being paid to offer security
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57302 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Campaign Funds for Bodyguards
Wonder how many "Bodyguards" will be carrying "weapons of war" that no one needs.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

“In light of current events"


There are no current events that require this.
Posted by lsujunky
Down By The River
Member since Jun 2011
2265 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

There are no current events that require this.


They could have been killed on January 6th.
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
7740 posts
Posted on 3/26/21 at 12:53 pm to
IF I was planning on sending these clowns any cash, which I am not, I would now keep it in my pocket so I could buy ammo to protect myself and my family, not them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram