- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:05 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
The pay for info is all but falling apart, and Burkman has a separate set of accusers.
quote:
When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation,”
This means that there are more than 1. Why would any Non-Trump cult member believe anyone he brought forward?
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:06 pm to YankeeBama
Just checking in for the melts and lulz.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:07 pm to Yak
In other words that's Honest Bob's denial. Got it.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:07 pm to Damone
quote:
Credible Accuser IMO
quote:
Burkman denied involvement in any attempt to pay people to frame or accuse Mueller. But he also claims that he has witnesses who will expose the Special Counsel as a sexual harasser and has scheduled a Thursday press conference in Northern Virginia to introduce his first accuser.
“We’re going to prove that he is a drunk and a sexual abuser,” Burkman told The Daily Beast.
Mueller has undergone extensive background checks during a career that has included a stint as director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Burkman has not any offered any evidence at all of his accusations and his previous “bombshell” press conferences on other stories have become notorious flops in Washington media circles. In July, he promised that he had a whistleblower who would prove the government killed Rich. But Burkman’s witness never showed in person, instead calling in anonymously via speakerphone — a stunt that enraged Burkman’s fellow conspiracy theorists.
Sure, put your faith in this guy. I'm sure it'll work out how you think it will.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:08 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
This means that there are more than 1. Why would any Non-Trump cult member believe anyone he brought forward?
Why wouldn't we believe it? We were just told a few months ago these women MUST be heard and believed.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:09 pm to BamaFan365
quote:
In other words that's Honest Bob's denial. Got it.
quote:
This isn’t Burkman’s first attempt to get publicity for a sexual assault allegation either. In late 2017, with the MeToo movement kicking off, Burkman claimed that he represented a woman who would accuse a congressman of sexual assault. But with the press on hand for the revelations, Burkman had to concede that his client refused to appear. Instead, Burkman offered everyone a “big apology” for wasting their time.
LINK
LOL, this should end this thread.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:09 pm to tigerinDC09
You are a hypocrite. You were absolutely on here pimping the Avenatti accuser
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:10 pm to NIH
quote:
She's definitely credible
He's be CREDIBLY accused
CREDIBLY!
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:10 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Why wouldn't we believe it? We were just told a few months ago these women MUST be heard and believed.
quote:
This isn’t Burkman’s first attempt to get publicity for a sexual assault allegation either. In late 2017, with the MeToo movement kicking off, Burkman claimed that he represented a woman who would accuse a congressman of sexual assault. But with the press on hand for the revelations, Burkman had to concede that his client refused to appear. Instead, Burkman offered everyone a “big apology” for wasting their time.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:13 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
So you think his accusers will be a no show Thursday? Also, did he allegedly pay for stories, or did he pay to fabricate stories? Big diff.
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:13 pm to upgrayedd
Why isn't Mueller asking for an FBI investigation? If I was innocent, I would want my name cleared
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:14 pm to tigerinDC09
Love how you refused to denounce Avenatti when he was a fraud going after Kav truly shows your hypocritical ways.
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:14 pm to NIH
Haven’t read the victim’s stories, but was the event indelibly stuck In their hippocampus?
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:14 pm to YankeeBama
Peter Carr we need to have a full blown investigation to see what he did to her. #Ibelieveher #Womensaintvictims
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:14 pm to NIH
quote:
Why isn't Mueller asking for an FBI investigation?
quote:
An alleged scheme to pay off women to fabricate sexual assault allegations against Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been referred to the FBI for further investigation, according to a spokesman for the special counsel’s office, Peter Carr. "When we learned last week of allegations that women were offered money to make false claims about the Special Counsel, we immediately referred the matter to the FBI for investigation," Carr said in a statement on Tuesday.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:17 pm to Yak
Sorry, that sounds like he's rigging the system to bury this credible accuser's allegations.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:18 pm to NIH
quote:If you're going to troll, at least be good at it
Sorry, that sounds like he's rigging the system to bury this credible accuser's allegations.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 2:18 pm to NIH
quote:
Why isn't Mueller asking for an FBI investigation? If I was innocent, I would want my name cleared
Special Counsel Refers Scheme Targeting Mueller to FBI
Popular
Back to top



2









