Started By
Message

re: Confessed Terrorist Floyd Corkins Admits to Using SPLC Target List

Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47533 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:02 pm to
What truth? They got indicted. You just don’t like it.

You aren’t privy to any information the grand jury didn’t see, and you are blind to almost all of the evidence they did see.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44148 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

I'm not defending them.


Them?

I would be surprised to find that you have worked with “them.”
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 7:04 pm
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
10995 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:16 pm to
Terrorists paying the kkk
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52514 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:47 pm to
quote:


the808bass
At most, SLPC is a point of rhetoric where things once were said or did. But it has no effect on anything. The reason I know that it has no effect is that if it had an effect then my argument would seem really dumb. So, pretty obvious that is has no effect.


WTF is this jibberish?
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63355 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:53 pm to
LINK

quote:

On the morning of Aug. 15, 2012, Corkins rode Metrorail from Virginia and into the District of Columbia, got off at the Gallery Place stop, and went to the Family Research Council. To gain access into the building, he falsely told the security guard, Mr. Johnson, that he was there for an interview as a prospective intern. Upon gaining entry, Corkins approached the receptionist desk, which Mr. Johnson was manning, intending to shoot and kill him. However, Mr. Johnson fought back and, as the two men scuffled, Corkins fired his gun three times, striking Mr. Johnson once in his left arm in the process. After Mr. Johnson subdued Corkins, Corkins stated, “It’s not about you,” but about the organization’s policies. He also was heard making remarks such as, “I don’t like these people, and I don’t like what they stand for.”

In a search after the shooting, MPD officers discovered two fully loaded magazine clips in one of Corkins’s front pants pockets, as well as a Metro card and a handwritten list containing the names of the Family Research Council and three other organizations that openly identify themselves as having socially conservative agendas. A search of Corkins’s backpack turned up, among other items, a box of 50 rounds of 9 mm ammunition. They also found 15 individually wrapped sandwiches that Corkins had purchased the previous day from Chick-fil-A.

Corkins later made statements to the FBI in which he said that he was a political activist and considered the Family Research Council to be a lobbying group. He also stated that he intended to kill as many people as possible and smother the Chick-fil-A sandwiches into their faces. Among other things, he said, “Chick-fil-A came out against gay marriage so I was going to use that as a statement.”
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166742 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:57 pm to
Anyone defending SPLC Is paid or nuts.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11345 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

it's really only SFP that is defending them.


Has he still been doing this today? Haven't been around. I bet he's made 1,000 posts defending these people in the past 3 days.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157557 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

What's wrong with being contrarian to stupidity and dishonesty?


This is where you lose me. You have never changed a single mind here. You immediately say yeah but I’m right.


Maybe you are the worst possible messenger of truth imaginable and if that’s true that explains a lot.

You are not the savior you long to be.

Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70928 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:59 pm to
It's pretty obvious to most why those scumbags kept a public list of enemies and why the majority of their list wasn't randim "nazis" but prominent conservatives. Most of us have always understood their objectives.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32235 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:00 pm to
While stroking himself
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476092 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

What truth? They got indicted.


People seem very confused about the contents of that indictment

quote:

You aren’t privy to any information the grand jury didn’t see,

I never said I was. I'm going off the actual contents of the indictment
Posted by Csmims
A sandy beach in paradise
Member since Jan 2019
4050 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:03 pm to
You don’t want the truth because you can’t handle the truth
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476092 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Them?

I would be surprised to find that you have worked with “them.”

The SPLC? I'd never work with them

I don't particularly like them
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
33255 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Only the truth


Sad. Your truth perhaps
Posted by TuDog
Boston
Member since Jun 2005
4536 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:20 pm to
Trump outed SPLC.
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
1559 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

people take the bait every single time. Amazing.


Yep. never try to argue with this rtard. Just call him a fggot and move on.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47533 posts
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:13 pm to
The indictment for defrauding donors who thought they were stopping white supremacy but were actually funding it?

Yeah, we can read too.
Posted by NytroBud
LaFayette
Member since Jun 2009
6052 posts
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:38 am to
quote:

At most, SLPC is a point of rhetoric where things once were said or did. But it has no effect on anything. The reason I know that it has no effect is that if it had an effect then my argument would seem really dumb. So, pretty obvious that is has no effect.


Kamala? Is that you?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476092 posts
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:39 am to
quote:

but were actually funding it?


Example of confusion
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476092 posts
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:40 am to
quote:

WTF is this jibberish?


quote:

Kamala? Is that you?


More confusion, but not at the indictment
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram