- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Confessed Terrorist Floyd Corkins Admits to Using SPLC Target List
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
What truth? They got indicted. You just don’t like it.
You aren’t privy to any information the grand jury didn’t see, and you are blind to almost all of the evidence they did see.
You aren’t privy to any information the grand jury didn’t see, and you are blind to almost all of the evidence they did see.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not defending them.
Them?
I would be surprised to find that you have worked with “them.”
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:16 pm to jimmy the leg
Terrorists paying the kkk
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
the808bass
At most, SLPC is a point of rhetoric where things once were said or did. But it has no effect on anything. The reason I know that it has no effect is that if it had an effect then my argument would seem really dumb. So, pretty obvious that is has no effect.
WTF is this jibberish?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:53 pm to loogaroo
LINK
quote:
On the morning of Aug. 15, 2012, Corkins rode Metrorail from Virginia and into the District of Columbia, got off at the Gallery Place stop, and went to the Family Research Council. To gain access into the building, he falsely told the security guard, Mr. Johnson, that he was there for an interview as a prospective intern. Upon gaining entry, Corkins approached the receptionist desk, which Mr. Johnson was manning, intending to shoot and kill him. However, Mr. Johnson fought back and, as the two men scuffled, Corkins fired his gun three times, striking Mr. Johnson once in his left arm in the process. After Mr. Johnson subdued Corkins, Corkins stated, “It’s not about you,” but about the organization’s policies. He also was heard making remarks such as, “I don’t like these people, and I don’t like what they stand for.”
In a search after the shooting, MPD officers discovered two fully loaded magazine clips in one of Corkins’s front pants pockets, as well as a Metro card and a handwritten list containing the names of the Family Research Council and three other organizations that openly identify themselves as having socially conservative agendas. A search of Corkins’s backpack turned up, among other items, a box of 50 rounds of 9 mm ammunition. They also found 15 individually wrapped sandwiches that Corkins had purchased the previous day from Chick-fil-A.
Corkins later made statements to the FBI in which he said that he was a political activist and considered the Family Research Council to be a lobbying group. He also stated that he intended to kill as many people as possible and smother the Chick-fil-A sandwiches into their faces. Among other things, he said, “Chick-fil-A came out against gay marriage so I was going to use that as a statement.”
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:57 pm to loogaroo
Anyone defending SPLC Is paid or nuts.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:58 pm to Rebel
quote:
it's really only SFP that is defending them.
Has he still been doing this today? Haven't been around. I bet he's made 1,000 posts defending these people in the past 3 days.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What's wrong with being contrarian to stupidity and dishonesty?
This is where you lose me. You have never changed a single mind here. You immediately say yeah but I’m right.
Maybe you are the worst possible messenger of truth imaginable and if that’s true that explains a lot.
You are not the savior you long to be.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:59 pm to loogaroo
It's pretty obvious to most why those scumbags kept a public list of enemies and why the majority of their list wasn't randim "nazis" but prominent conservatives. Most of us have always understood their objectives.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:03 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
What truth? They got indicted.
People seem very confused about the contents of that indictment
quote:
You aren’t privy to any information the grand jury didn’t see,
I never said I was. I'm going off the actual contents of the indictment
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
You don’t want the truth because you can’t handle the truth
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:04 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Them?
I would be surprised to find that you have worked with “them.”
The SPLC? I'd never work with them
I don't particularly like them
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only the truth
Sad. Your truth perhaps
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:54 pm to PastorJ
quote:
people take the bait every single time. Amazing.
Yep. never try to argue with this rtard. Just call him a fggot and move on.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 10:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
The indictment for defrauding donors who thought they were stopping white supremacy but were actually funding it?
Yeah, we can read too.
Yeah, we can read too.
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:38 am to the808bass
quote:
At most, SLPC is a point of rhetoric where things once were said or did. But it has no effect on anything. The reason I know that it has no effect is that if it had an effect then my argument would seem really dumb. So, pretty obvious that is has no effect.
Kamala? Is that you?
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:39 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
but were actually funding it?
Example of confusion
Posted on 4/25/26 at 5:40 am to NytroBud
quote:
WTF is this jibberish?
quote:
Kamala? Is that you?
More confusion, but not at the indictment
Popular
Back to top



1








