re: Comey Admits He Knew Democrats Financed ‘Pee’ Dossier Before FISA Warrant Signoff

quote:

---

I don’t think they disclosed there was no verification of the dossier and that the opposition funded it.

---

quote:

---

Source #1...has been and FBI source since...Source #1 has been compensated by the FBI...in or about October 2016, the FBI suspended its
relationship with Source #1 due to Source #l's unauthorized disclosure of
information to the press. Notwithstanding the suspension of its relationship with
Source #1, the FBI assesses Source #1 to be reliable as previous reporting from
Source #1 has been corroborated and used in criminal proceedings. Moreover, the
FBI notes that the incident that led to the FBI suspending its relationship with
Source #1 occurred after Source #1 provided the reporting that is described herein.
(U) ~) Source #1, who now owns a foreign business/financial intelligence
firm, was approached by an identified U.S. person, who indicated to Source #1 that a
U.S.-based law firm had hired the identified U.S. person to conduct research
regarding Candidate #l's ties to Russia (the identified U.S. person and Source #1
have a long-standing business relationship). The identified U.S. person hired Source
#1 to conduct this research. The identified U.S. person never advised Source #1 as to the motivation behind the research into Candidate #l's ties to Russia. The FBI
speculates that the identified U.S. person was likely looking for information that
could be used to discredit Candidate #l's campaign.

U) ~ Source #1 tasked his sub-source(s) to collect the requisite information. After Source #1 received information from the sub-source(s) described
herein, Source #1 provided the information to the identified U.S. person who had
hired Source #1 and to the FBI.

(~ Notwithstanding Source #1 's reason for conducting the research
into Candidate #l's ties to Russia, based on Source #l's previous reporting history
with the FBI, whereby Source #1 provided reliable information to the FBI, the FBI
believes Source #l's reporting herein to be credible.

---

They clearly delineate the humint sourcing and that the FBI believes it based upon the credibility and track record of their source. Also very clearly indicates the opposition research nature of his work. And again, the court can always ask for more information if needed for the PC determination.

These judges are not dumb. All four of them found PC.

quote:

---

They misled the court.


How?

---

Is it really this hard for you to grasp? In order to obtain a FISA warrant, the evidence submitted must be verified. If you knowingly submit unverified information (Comey admits the document wasn’t verified) and you do so without informing the court, you are in fact misleading the court.

Do you think the FISA court or any court for that matter would grant a warrant if they knew the applicant was submitting unverifiable information as evidence? The courts depend on these investigative agencies to submit real verified evidence when making decisions in regards to warrants and surveillance. When that breaks down, and unverifiable evidence is submitted, the risk is serious abuse of power... we have launched a full scale investigation, spent millions of dollars, ensnared multiple people with process crimes and split this country in half and it can all be traced back to a political campaign spending millions on phony opposition research that the FBI then used (knowing it wasn’t verified) to launch multiple investigations into a political campaign.

This is not how the American judicial system is supposed to work! This is totalitarianism at its finest. This is the justice system you find in hell holes around the globe.

You know Decatur will defend the FISA courts no matter what. They are an unsupervised and secret court that take whatever is shown to them as the gospel truth. It’s bullshite.

But how dare we besmirch the ingrity and honor of our Federal Investigatory Bureau, right Dems? How dare we suggest they were anything but humble civil servents following the case based on the facts without bias!
frick all you lowlife Democrat scum. Your whole history is one of oppression and subversion.

They cite an individual who may want to discredit the trump campaign as the source. They Knew who it was. They didn’t disclose. They also state that they believe he info in the dossier was accurate based upon Steele’s prior work. They knew full well it was not true. They were the ones leaking to the media. They then cite those media reports as corroborating evidence. They also failed to fully disclose page’s role for the fbi. They sugar coated the app. To argue otherwise is silly.

quote:

---

I can’t wait until you get to the part where he quotes the disclosure from the app

---

The best part is that the FBI “verified” parts of their “evidence” by leaking stories to a yahoo news reporter and then used his story in the fisa application to say look its verified, its right here in this yahoo news story. Did they disclose to the FISA court that they were the source for the story to begin with??? I mean come the frick on. They played so many games with the application that there is absolutely zero chance any evidence gathered as a result of it would be admissible in court. And surprise surprise, not a damn bit of it has been used in court! That’s why Honest Bob can’t get anyone on anything more than a process crime. The Federal courts would butt frick him up and down the eastern seaboard if he presented a shred of evidence obtained from the FISA warrant.

So lack of names and you think they had independent evidence proving the dossier was not true and failed to disclose that? If not then that goes to my earlier point... what’s their obligation to independently verify every statement in the app?

Leaking to the media and citing it as corroborating is shady and dishonest.

We’re they talking about Steele or Page when staying their work had been used in criminal proceedings before? I can’t see the post from Decatur

What’s their description of Page?

quote:

---

What’s their description of Page?

---

I don’t recall what they referred to him as. I jut remember it struck me they failed to disclose the extent and timing of his work with the fbi. No reason to leave that out if you aren’t trying to sugar coat. And lo and behold, here we are years later...Carter wasn’t a spy. The dossier has been disproven. Yet people still support spying on a politician because they don’t like him. It’s a complete misuse of the Justice system and should scare everyone.