- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN: Senator Langford skeptical of Tulsi Gabbard
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:07 am to Lou Pai
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:07 am to Lou Pai
Of course that’s what you take out of it, you dense retard. Go read the original Constitution about the Senate. Just because an amendment is added in doesn’t make it all fine and dandy that we have a glorified House chamber as the Senate. frick off.
2
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:09 am to Harry Ballz 2024
Dude amendments are literally a part of the constitution
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:12 am to Lou Pai
Your argument is about the Founders’ intent. The intent wasn’t to have direct elections for the Senate. People like this wouldn’t be in the Senate if the original intent was still in place. Don’t argue original intent and then say but muh amendment is just as valid. Shove it up your crusty arse.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:18 am to Harry Ballz 2024
You somehow think the Senate would get less "swampy" if the state legislatures picked U.S. Senators? 
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:22 am to Lou Pai
It would be better than this shitshow and most state assemblies are closer to their constituents than your typical senator. The Founders, who you seem to rely on as your point for this argument, were not weary of this.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:29 am to John Barron
I once again apologize on behalf of all Okies for sending Lankford to D.C..
And, I once again promise on behalf of all Okies that we're going to primary this slimy swamp PoS.
And, I once again promise on behalf of all Okies that we're going to primary this slimy swamp PoS.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 11:31 am to John Barron
That wussy doesn't even look like a real person. Looks like he was created by a southern preacher computer program.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Big Green new Deal person.
quote:
Silent on Green New Deal; supports push for renewables. (Mar 2019)
That’s from your link.
Yeah she’s pro doing things for climate change but so is every democrat.
Maybe people have been able to change her mind in things. Dems are against nuclear. Would her talking with someone like Elon be able to change their mind on using nuclear if you truly want to use less fossil fuels?
Because you aren’t replacing fossil fuels with wind.
This post was edited on 11/24/24 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:06 pm to John Barron
I have a lot of questions for Langford.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:08 pm to John Barron
quote:
CNN: Senator Langford skeptical of Tulsi Gabbard
Well.... if that P.O.S is skeptical of her, then she's probably the right person for the job.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:10 pm to Spawn
quote:
Trump needs to appoint him Ambassador to Fiji and get a real conservative in that seat.
Fiji? frick that. Send his arse to Mogdishu..
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:17 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Maybe people have been able to change her mind in things.
If you want to trust these Democratic Socialists, be my guest. Dont be surprised when they disappoint you.
This post was edited on 11/24/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:19 pm to LSURussian
quote:
I guess that means you'd support Kamala Harris being nominated for DNI??
Good Lord Roger. You make some wild leaps. So dumb.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:27 pm to RFK
quote:
To be fair she would be the least qualified DNI in history.
She would be the most qualified DNI in history because she has demonstrated the ability to oppose obvious lies trotted out as "intelligence," but which are just more cover for the Military Industrial Complex to work against the interest of the American people.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:27 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Good Lord Roger. You make some wild leaps. So dumb.
That aint me, Junior. Read the name of the person you responded to. If you can.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:31 pm to Harry Ballz 2024
quote:
Just because an amendment is added in doesn’t make it all fine and dandy
so youre anti constitution.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I could say the same for people who support the hijacking of it with these amendments and then hiding behind the “well it’s in the constitution, so you must be anti-constitution” veil. It goes double for people using “muh Founders envisioned” for arguments that have been nullified by the addition of these amendments, such as why we have Senate confirmations for the President’s cabinet.
Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
so youre anti constitution.
so dumb. Posted on 11/24/24 at 12:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
That aint me, Junior
It’s your modus operandi, junior. Can’t blame me for thinking the normally level headed Russian was you with that post.
This post was edited on 11/24/24 at 12:47 pm
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News