- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN: First charges filed by Mueller
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:46 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:46 pm to Robin Masters
i'm glad we're talking about it then. this is going to be a super complex ever expanding investigation that could take years not months.
manafort, flynn are probably going to be the ones indicted, if not convicted. the question is how much were they involved with trump if at all, and if so, when did trump and/pr his team know they were compromised?
manafort, flynn are probably going to be the ones indicted, if not convicted. the question is how much were they involved with trump if at all, and if so, when did trump and/pr his team know they were compromised?
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:47 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I find it impressive that people thing a fricking State court is going to bring down the President of the United States
I mean what are you saying is the end game here
The Federal Government is charging a rando person so that means the state of New York is going to go after Trump
You have to be one kind of dumb fricking idiot to think state level crimes levied against the President of the United States have any kind of importance to anything
I mean what are you saying is the end game here
The Federal Government is charging a rando person so that means the state of New York is going to go after Trump
You have to be one kind of dumb fricking idiot to think state level crimes levied against the President of the United States have any kind of importance to anything
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:47 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Read the part about dual sovereign
So basically can be tried at state and federal level?
What is the tie to a pardon?
Assuming Sheriff in Arizona was state crimes?
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:47 pm to Sentrius
quote:
That really doesn't mean anything.
Lots of Bush republicans have feverently opposed Trump.
Look at Doc Fention in this thread. He's a conservative that loves the hell of Bush and he's all pitchforks and torches after Trump.
but why would a republican ally with the democrats when people of his own party are still in positions of power in the senate and house?
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:48 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
you know that mueller is a republican right?
yeah and his whole team is stocked full of democRats of questionable ethical character
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:49 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
but why would a republican ally with the democrats when people of his own party are still in positions of power in the senate and house?
Not binary in my opinion
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:49 pm to Sentrius
quote:Keep your mouth shut and I'll pardon you
But can you get past the leverage of the pardon power of the president depending on how close they are with Trump?
I know that's how I like to be represented in DC
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:50 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
So basically can be tried at state and federal level?
yes.
quote:
What is the tie to a pardon?
accepting a presidential pardon has throughout judicial history been seen as admission of guilt. this multi-pronged investigation is being brought through in a very smart way to prevent these people from getting off the hook IF they are indeed guilty.
quote:
Assuming Sheriff in Arizona was state crimes?
More than a month after lawyers wrapped up closing arguments, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton found Arpaio guilty for defying a judge’s 2011 court order to refrain from racially profiling Latinos during patrols and turning them over to federal immigration authorities.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:51 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
but why would a republican ally with the democrats when people of his own party are still in positions of power in the senate and house?
I don't know if you're just a casual observer of politics or whatnot but Trump and the GOP establishment have a wide gulf of differences on a whole lot of things ranging from policy ideas to everyday personal behavior and the culture wars.
Before Trump the nationalist came along on the scene, the GOP was mostly an internationalist party where they supported economic globalization and open borders and Trump is vastly opposed to that.
Lot's of Never Trump republicans actually voted Hillary Clinton or just sat out the election.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:51 pm to LSU Fan 90812
karma, who is your prediction for being charged? And what is your prediction is the charge for? You seem pretty educated on this stuff.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:51 pm to Giant Leaf
You are literally too dumb to insult.
No one is talking about charging the president. We’re talking about charging an associate of the president with federal crimes with a state-crime equal charge. The president can pardon federal crimes, not state-level crimes.
For using the word libtard so often, you sure are an ignorant motherfricker.
No one is talking about charging the president. We’re talking about charging an associate of the president with federal crimes with a state-crime equal charge. The president can pardon federal crimes, not state-level crimes.
For using the word libtard so often, you sure are an ignorant motherfricker.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:52 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I would guess that any effort to prosecute somebody on the State level who has already received a pardon From the POTUS would be roundly criticized by anybody beyond hard core Partisans. Has it ever happened?
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:52 pm to thelawnwranglers
Sheriff was federal charge of contempt of court. Trump pardoned which was completely within his power.
Yes, two separate governments that can each charge you with crimes. President can only pardon on one level which would leave you exposed on the state level.
Yes, two separate governments that can each charge you with crimes. President can only pardon on one level which would leave you exposed on the state level.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:53 pm to Sentrius
i am very aware of the difference between trump's base and the GOP's base and the overlap in between.
i'm just trying to figure out how and why people think Democrats are after Trump. And Republicans are after Trump. But it's mostly the Dems?
i'm going to stick to talking about the law and the grand jury indictments and helping try to explain how this COULD all go down.
i'm just trying to figure out how and why people think Democrats are after Trump. And Republicans are after Trump. But it's mostly the Dems?
i'm going to stick to talking about the law and the grand jury indictments and helping try to explain how this COULD all go down.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:53 pm to boosiebadazz
Libtard is always a red flag
Pretty much a guarantee they post their politics on Facebook and believe chain emails
Pretty much a guarantee they post their politics on Facebook and believe chain emails
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:54 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
accepting a presidential pardon has throughout judicial history been seen as admission of guilt. this multi-pronged investigation is being brought through in a very smart way to prevent these people from getting off the hook IF they are indeed guilty.
At a very simplified level by including State and Federal AG?
quote:
for defying a judge’s 2011 court order to refrain from racially profiling Latinos during patrols and turning them over to federal immigration authorities.
How are court orders managed? What are the rules around what you can and can't court order?
Synopsis though Joe was in Federal trouble -basically if it was state law there could be no pardon?
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:54 pm to Lsupimp
Not if the presidential pardon was seen as naked politics. I’d actually see it as another shining example of the brilliance of our constitution and our federalism.
This post was edited on 10/27/17 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:55 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
but why would a republican ally with the democrats when people of his own party are still in positions of power in the senate and house?
Because I think we are witnessing a fundamental realignment in American politics. The neoliberal faction of the Democratic Party and the neoconservative faction of the Republican Party have almost identical policy positions on major issues regarding foreign policy, monetary policy, immigration and state surveillance.
The Trump faction, which I don't think can be lumped into either party, and the Rand Paul libertarians are the future of the Republican Party. The George Bush's, David Frum's and Bill Kristol's of the world are going to be aligned with the Democrats for the foreseeable future.
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:56 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
I would guess that any effort to prosecute somebody on the State level who has already received a pardon From the POTUS would be roundly criticized by anybody beyond hard core Partisans. Has it ever happened?
i mean, if we were trying to guess optics? NY State is pretty blue. So I don't think any AG of NY State would have to worry about backlash for going after a presumably guilty, pre-emptively pardoned criminal (IF THE GUY IS GUILTY)
and opticly speaking, i would think the president pardoning a guilty man with ties to russia (manafort) or flynn (turkey) without the due process of law, and then having the state prove them guilty would look far worse as far as political optics go.
Popular
Back to top


1











