Started By
Message

re: CNN: First charges filed by Mueller

Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:57 pm to
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

i am very aware of the difference between trump's base and the GOP's base and the overlap in between.


Actually the Trump base is actually the GOP base.

The base is just at war with the GOP party leaders and its establishment and Trump is the battle tank for that war.

quote:

i'm just trying to figure out how and why people think Democrats are after Trump.


Democrat members of Congress have literally filed articles of impeachment this year multiple times already and the media is pressing anti trump republicans whether they support impeachment or not.

quote:

And Republicans are after Trump.


Neoconservative and some moderate republicans. Sure.
Posted by tilco
Spanish Fort, AL
Member since Nov 2013
14470 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:57 pm to
C O M F Y
O
M
F
Y
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

At a very simplified level by including State and Federal AG?


absolutely. this doesn't happen often that the two are working together like this. it is the result of a very wide ranging investigation, and a well coordinated legal team with a lot of foresight. it is much more likely that their coordination is in place to prevent the very pardon that Leaf was talking about.

quote:

Synopsis though Joe was in Federal trouble -basically if it was state law there could be no pardon?


the pardon would be from the governor homey.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

once again, that is of federal offenses. the president does not have the power to pardon state crimes. only federal ones. cases can be brought against criminals in multiple jurisdictions. if the case is stacked enough against flynn or manafort badly enough for where they would need a pardon in FEDERAL COURT (as opposed to actually being innocent of the crime), would it not make sense to you that that evidence would also be enough to convict them in state court as well?


This is completely different from what you first said. Also, the charges in question would be very critical. Federal disclosure laws are not punishable under state statute.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Actually the Trump base is actually the GOP base.


sure as hell looks like it will be from here on out.

quote:

Democrat members of Congress have literally filed articles of impeachment this year multiple times already and the media is pressing anti trump republicans whether they support impeachment or not.



they're about a year early. 2018 is gonna be interesting.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

This is completely different from what you first said. Also, the charges in question would be very critical. Federal disclosure laws are not punishable under state statute.


got to read the thread buddy. since a 1915 supreme court case, acceptance of a pardon has been wildly held to be an admission of guilt of the crime.

if Trump pardons manafort at the federal level AND the above is true, NY state's case against manafort will be a cakewalk.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:00 pm to
Take a deep breath there man. Several of the charges that I have seen mentioned are NOT STATE CHARGES.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97721 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

manafort, flynn are probably going to be the ones indicted, if not convicted. the question is how much were they involved with trump if at all, and if so, when did trump and/pr his team know they were compromised?


i cant wait for it to be Tony Podesta
Posted by blackjackjackson
fourth dimension
Member since May 2008
7684 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:00 pm to
nuttin to see here! trump wins!

i'm soooo tired of winning!
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86146 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:00 pm to
So if Hillary gets indicted, and Trump pardons her, we can expect NY to file charges, right ?
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Take a deep breath there man. Several of the charges that I have seen mentioned are NOT STATE CHARGES.


money laundering is a pretty convenient one. it's federal because it's regarding federal currency. it's state because it's happening within a state jurisdiction. that'll be enough.

what if it's podesta AND manafort?

Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
6182 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

So if Hillary gets indicted, and Trump pardons her, we can expect NY to file charges, right ?


You seem confused.

Anyhow, gonna be interesting to see where this goes.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42289 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

i'm just trying to figure out how and why people think Democrats are after Trump. And Republicans are after Trump. But it's mostly the Dems? 



I will take a shot at this. I have no faith in elected officials. I think they are all corrupted. I don't see Trump as some white knight figures (double entendra intended). He has that outsider appeal and he isn't beholden to anyone or "in" it for the money.

That said I think he is brand building and trying to take family to next level Kennedy style. So not in it for money is wishful thinking.

I honestly think some of his ideas are terrible, but at least they aren't bought and paid for.

My example would be healthcare for years we have been told how terrible it is, but they had no plan. That isn't an accident - money is somehow tied to status quo pieces.
Posted by LSU Fan 90812
A man more eviler than Skeletor.
Member since Feb 2005
50655 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

So if Hillary gets indicted, and Trump pardons her, we can expect NY to file charges, right ?


well i think that would depend on where hillary was based during the campaign now wouldn't it? or the site of whatever crimes you guys think she committed. so if you think mueller is investigating hillary, then he would be coordinating with that states attorney general.
Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
6182 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:03 pm to
And people should probably read up on the concept of Dual Sovereignty.
Posted by Volatile
Tennessee
Member since Apr 2014
6182 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:05 pm to
quote:



I will take a shot at this. I have no faith in elected officials. I think they are all corrupted. I don't see Trump as some white knight figures (double entendra intended). He has that outsider appeal and he isn't beholden to anyone or "in" it for the money.

That said I think he is brand building and trying to take family to next level Kennedy style. So not in it for money is wishful thinking.

I honestly think some of his ideas are terrible, but at least they aren't bought and paid for.

My example would be healthcare for years we have been told how terrible it is, but they had no plan. That isn't an accident - money is somehow tied to status quo pieces.


That's an exceptionally good take. I agree.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85486 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:05 pm to
I tried, bro, but I was called a libtard :(

I even provided a link and everything
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

it is much more likely that their coordination is in place to prevent the very pardon that Leaf was talking about.

There have been articles on how Mueller is trying to make it as difficult as possible for anyone that may be convicted to just walk because Trump is a hack
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86146 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:07 pm to
No just pointing out the appearance of a pardon on the federal level followed by an indictment on the State level. Not that I think it’s wrong as a matter of law or even political philosophy, but just pretty crass on a partisan political level.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 10/27/17 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

Yes, two separate governments that can each charge you with crimes. President can only pardon on one level which would leave you exposed on the state level.


This is all well and good but they have to have violated a state law. You cant just dream one up.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram