Started By
Message

re: CNN Can Not Understand Why We Can Not Arrest The Drug Runners and Bring Them to Trial.

Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:36 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296005 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:36 pm to
quote:



You’re probably right. But I still support a violent military campaign against all the cartels.
''

Will just create new cartels. Its a 650 billion dollar industry, there will be more than enough willing to take risks.

Fentanyl capitalized on the govt crackdown on prescription opioid abuse.. its a synthetic. Its not going to be the last evolution. Indirectly, the crackdowns are partly responsible for more powerful synthetics becoming more problematic and the drug trade more dangerous.
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
150 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Will just create new cartels. Its a 650 billion dollar industry, there will be more than enough willing to take risks.


Just keep killing them and stealing their money.

quote:

Indirectly, the crackdowns are partly responsible for more powerful synthetics becoming more problematic and the drug trade more dangerous.


Nah, synthetics are cheaper and easier to produce. We need to find a solution to that. I’d be okay with a targeted assassination campaign against the Chinese gangsters sending their fent over here too
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296005 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

. We need to find a solution to that. I’d be okay with a targeted assassination campaign against the Chinese gangsters sending their fent over here too


This is more utopian fantasy.

The money behind our own demand drives the markets. You'll never stop it, and you'll spend a lot of other peoples money doing so.
Posted by Nurbis
Member since May 2020
2088 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Nah, just wiser than you and able to understand the difference between an actual terrorist kingpin vs run of the mill drug runners.


So as long as we are killing somebody you deem worthy, then it is okay.

And we never dropped bombs on terrorist foot soldiers, right? Just the kingpins? And we never killed civilians as acceptable collateral damage to get to a worthy target?

And even though the drugs these cartel runners are trafficking will kill many people, that is okay because they are not kingpins?

Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108123 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

I have no issue with the Bin Laden raid, but also have no issue with going after cartels


Yeah, that was the point. I really didn’t need to see the video baw. lol
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
150 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

This is more utopian fantasy.


Probably. I can still want it though.

quote:

The money behind our own demand drives the markets. You'll never stop it, and you'll spend a lot of other peoples money doing so.


What’s the alternative then. Do you have a solution to drug addiction that doesn’t involve taking on the drug suppliers? I mean I guess we could do some research and find the drug addiction gene that some people are born with and engineer that out.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296005 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:50 pm to
quote:


So as long as we are killing somebody you deem worthy, then it is okay.


These runners are easily replaceable. The info they have might be more important than their actual role.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296005 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:


What’s the alternative then. Do you have a solution to drug addiction that doesn’t involve taking on the drug suppliers?


Apply real and substantial penalty for possession of certain drugs.
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
150 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

These runners are easily replaceable. The info they have might be more important than their actual role.


They likely have zero info of value, hence why they’re expendable
Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
3380 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

No. A chihuahua does not become a pit bull, just because you call him one.


But if the pit bull begins to recruit those little frickers and he has 100s/1000s of them working for him…they are involved and need to be taken out.

It’s really a distinction without a difference and those defending these people are only doing it cause Trump.
Posted by AquaAg84
Member since May 2013
3374 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

You people are entertaining.


Along with all caps, here again is the condescending phrase 'you people'.

Yep, Hank not adhering to a ban, Got to make up alters to continue to be a flaming asshat.
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 6:18 pm
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17656 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:57 pm to
Yes it was. O' Leary shamed them all with that remark!!
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
150 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Apply real and substantial penalty for possession of certain drugs.


Cmon man, you know that won’t work. That’s like saying “As soon as those students learn to stop saying STTDB to every song is played we’ll start playing Neck again.” As if it isn’t a new group of reckless teenagers every year.

You can punish it and discourage all you want but there’s always fresh meat coming in to takeover the mantle.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20553 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

There are no POW’s in this one.

There are in fact tens of thousands incarcerated in the war on drugs.
Posted by CapnKangaroo
Member since Dec 2025
150 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

There are in fact tens of thousands incarcerated in the war on drugs.


There are tens of thousand of incarcerated from the law enforcement operation on drugs. Only the past few months has the USA conducted anything resembling an actual “war” on drugs. And the war isn’t nearly extensive enough in my opinion.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5760 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:01 pm to
Legal authority? What are you babbling about now? Lol your mangina is showing again
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17656 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

These baws are easier marks than old progressive white women


Read the book "The Underground Empire: Where Crime and Governments Embrace" long ago. It was written by James Mills. The present mission is part of a strategy I was calling for then and clearly after reading the above.

Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7175 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:07 pm to
Who determined it was illegal and unconstitutional? You?

JFC.
Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
4487 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:10 pm to
Hey Faggie “relentless”

It’s proven that it IS NOT ILLEGAL!!!

I’m in the International shipping industry & having represented shipowners from all over the world, and handling importing/exporting every type of commodity including cruise ships abroad.

“EVERY SINGLE SHIP” goes in Int’l Waters & EVERY SINGLE SHIP HAS A FLAG STATE that they are registered in.

And to answer your IDIOTIC STATEMENT & many of you idiots on here saying they have rights.

As SOON AS YOU GET INTO INT’L Waters like they are and don’t have any identification, they can be considered pirates in a very watered down version to explain to you idiots.

POST LESS
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
43921 posts
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:16 pm to
It’s a shame Obama normalized the POTUS murdering people. Even more disheartening that Trump has doubled down on it. Makes me wonder what the next clown will do with the same authority?
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram