- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:04 pm to boosiebadazz
I think it’s unlikely the cia had other evidence, because Horowitz found that the fbi relies entirely on Steele dossier for carter page fisa warrants.
If the cia had other info, it would have been included in the application
If the cia had other info, it would have been included in the application
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:06 pm to ScottFowler
Trust Durham
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:Who says this is simple? The swamp runs deep and it is difficult to dot i’s and cross t’s with the entire DC establishment fighting against you. Slow and meticulous is the name of the game.
Sure. Rule of law matters. But Durham has been at this for awhile now and if it’s a simple, “OMB, go get him” plot then that seems pretty cut and dry and easy to wrap up.
quote:Who says he is holding anything back? What if timing and pacing was known and planned/expected to arrive at a reveal shortly before the election?
It would be supreme irony for Trump to hold back a prosecution for political effect after the Comey/HRC email fiasco in 2016.
quote:Sure he does, but he is also a liar and a traitor in my estimation. He is part of the reason the investigation and evidence gathering is taking so long.
But no part of you has ever though Brennan, the head of the CIA, may have had more information at his disposal than what is currently publicly known?
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:13 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
What if timing and pacing was known and planned/expected to arrive at a reveal shortly before the election?
You’re contradicting yourself. The white hats knew how long it would take to prosecute and planned it out despite the unknown of the entire DC establishment working against them and Brennan throwing up roadblocks along the way?
I don’t want to venture into forbidden letter territory and derail this thread, but that dog don’t hunt.
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:16 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:Nope. I’ll explain.
You’re contradicting yourself.
quote:More like they knew the swamp was deep and slick and that there would be no easy path forward and prepared accordingly.
The white hats knew how long it would take to prosecute and planned it out despite the unknown of the entire DC establishment working against them and Brennan throwing up roadblocks along the way?
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:19 pm to boosiebadazz
Boosie, in your view, which of the 3 would be biggest bombshell?
1) Durham charges multiple FBI agents with conspiring to mislead fisa court
2) Durham discovers that Joseph Mifsud is a cia/European intel agent and that there was an earlier undercover probe of trump before FBI’s probe, this one being run by overseas allies
3) Durham finds that the cia had evidence that Russia was also targeting Trump, but hid it from intel assessment
1) Durham charges multiple FBI agents with conspiring to mislead fisa court
2) Durham discovers that Joseph Mifsud is a cia/European intel agent and that there was an earlier undercover probe of trump before FBI’s probe, this one being run by overseas allies
3) Durham finds that the cia had evidence that Russia was also targeting Trump, but hid it from intel assessment
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:21 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
2 or 3.
Democrats would jump on 3 and Trump would go ballistic.
1 would be the opposite. Trump would embrace the shite out of it and the Dems would be meh to half-assedly defending the FBI
Democrats would jump on 3 and Trump would go ballistic.
1 would be the opposite. Trump would embrace the shite out of it and the Dems would be meh to half-assedly defending the FBI
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:25 pm to boosiebadazz
Number 2 wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing for fbi
They can reasonably argue they had no clue that another probe was going on
They can reasonably argue they had no clue that another probe was going on
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:25 pm to boosiebadazz
But if it is true there was top secret intel Brennan knew and it absolved him, we’ll never know.
They won’t indict and maybe there will be a hugely redacted report and they may, may brief Gang of Eight just so they can do the talk shows and placate the public that from what they heard it was legit.
They won’t indict and maybe there will be a hugely redacted report and they may, may brief Gang of Eight just so they can do the talk shows and placate the public that from what they heard it was legit.
This post was edited on 8/21/20 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 8/21/20 at 11:40 pm to ScottFowler
The fact that he even made a statement should tell you everything. Innocent people or people who aren’t worried don’t make statements
Posted on 8/22/20 at 12:03 am to UAinSOUTHAL
or maybe he is clearing his name now that he was let go by those investigating him.
No way to know unless we see otherwise from Durham.
No way to know unless we see otherwise from Durham.
Posted on 8/22/20 at 12:08 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Who is the one Durham absolutely has to indict for you guys to feel vindicated? Comey or Brennan, right? Does McCabe alone get it done?
Any fricking body.
Every arrest on the entire fricking planet is attributed to q as far as a q person is concerned.
Posted on 8/22/20 at 12:19 am to boosiebadazz
I think it's going to be Comey. But Brennan is the one that set this up. He's just a standard deviation more intelligent than Comey and played him like a Stradivarius.
Posted on 8/22/20 at 1:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Who is the one Durham absolutely has to indict for you guys to feel vindicated? Comey or Brennan, right? Does McCabe alone get it done?
Every person that committed a crime, such as, McCabe, Comey, Brennan, Clapper, HRC, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, MUller and all of his lawyers, Rosystein, etc.
Posted on 8/22/20 at 1:14 am to obdobd918
Brennon has been running his mouth on CNN for months proclaiming that everything the "get Trump" insiders did was completely legit.
Now, he's decided to use a spokesman and keep his own mouth shut.
Now, he's decided to use a spokesman and keep his own mouth shut.
Posted on 8/22/20 at 1:21 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Who is the one Durham absolutely has to indict for you guys to feel vindicated? Comey or Brennan, right? Does McCabe alone get it done?
Let’s put left vs right politics aside and lean on the principles of the founding fathers, if all the Swampers who conspired to take Trump down before and after the 2016 GE are allowed to walk unscathed this republic is essentially done!!!!!
Posted on 8/22/20 at 1:43 am to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
I think it's going to be Comey. But Brennan is the one that set this up. He's just a standard deviation more intelligent than Comey and played him like a Stradivarius.
Agreed. If someone has to pay, Comeys people will serve him on a platter to save their own skins
Posted on 8/22/20 at 2:02 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
2) Durham discovers that Joseph Mifsud is a cia/European intel agent and that there was an earlier undercover probe of trump before FBI’s probe, this one being run by overseas allies
Given Trump's past and connections to organized crime in Russia this shouldn't surprise anyone.
He is literally untouchable. No one can prove shite.
This post was edited on 8/22/20 at 2:02 am
Posted on 8/22/20 at 6:36 am to boosiebadazz
That’s it, everyone else gets off.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News